Evidence-Based Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions for the Management of Behavioral Issues in Individuals With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000971
Heather M MacKenzie, Cecilia Flores-Sandoval, Emma A Bateman, Amanda McIntyre, Ujjoyinee Barua, Swati Mehta, Mark Bayley, Robert Teasell
{"title":"Evidence-Based Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions for the Management of Behavioral Issues in Individuals With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Heather M MacKenzie, Cecilia Flores-Sandoval, Emma A Bateman, Amanda McIntyre, Ujjoyinee Barua, Swati Mehta, Mark Bayley, Robert Teasell","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present an evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions for the management of behavioral issues post moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (MSTBI), as part of an extensive database that has been conceptualized as a living systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO, up to and including December 2022, for articles published in the English language, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of RCT was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, and level of evidence was assigned using a modified Sackett scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six RCTs examining interventions and outcome measures related to behavioral issues post-MSTBI were included. These studies collectively enrolled 3,267 participants. The majority of RCTs were conducted in the United States (n = 27; 58.7%) and 28 (60.9%) were conducted after 2010. Of these, 27 RCTs examined non-pharmacological interventions and 19 examined pharmacological interventions. Effective pharmacological treatments included amantadine and dexmedetomidine. Effective non-pharmacological interventions included sensory stimulation in the acute phase, anger self-management programs, peer mentoring, problem-solving, and emotional regulation. Psychotherapy showed conflicting evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evidence-based review provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape of RCTs addressing behavior post-MSTBI. The findings from these RCTs may be valuable for health care professionals, researchers, and policymakers involved in the field of TBI and behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":"39 5","pages":"369-381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To present an evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions for the management of behavioral issues post moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (MSTBI), as part of an extensive database that has been conceptualized as a living systematic review.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO, up to and including December 2022, for articles published in the English language, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of RCT was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, and level of evidence was assigned using a modified Sackett scale.

Results: Forty-six RCTs examining interventions and outcome measures related to behavioral issues post-MSTBI were included. These studies collectively enrolled 3,267 participants. The majority of RCTs were conducted in the United States (n = 27; 58.7%) and 28 (60.9%) were conducted after 2010. Of these, 27 RCTs examined non-pharmacological interventions and 19 examined pharmacological interventions. Effective pharmacological treatments included amantadine and dexmedetomidine. Effective non-pharmacological interventions included sensory stimulation in the acute phase, anger self-management programs, peer mentoring, problem-solving, and emotional regulation. Psychotherapy showed conflicting evidence.

Conclusion: This evidence-based review provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape of RCTs addressing behavior post-MSTBI. The findings from these RCTs may be valuable for health care professionals, researchers, and policymakers involved in the field of TBI and behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于证据的中重度脑损伤患者行为问题管理干预随机对照试验综述》(Evidence-Based Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions for the Management of Behavioral Issues in Individuals with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brainjury)。
目的:对评估中度至重度脑损伤(MSTBI)后行为问题管理干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)进行循证综述,并将其作为一个广泛数据库的一部分,该数据库已被概念化为一个活的系统综述:根据系统综述和元分析首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南,在 MEDLINE、PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、EMBASE 和 PsycINFO 中对截至 2022 年 12 月(含 2022 年 12 月)用英语发表的文章进行了系统检索。采用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估RCT的质量,并采用修改后的Sackett量表确定证据等级:结果:共纳入了 46 项 RCT 研究,研究内容包括与创伤性脑损伤后行为问题相关的干预措施和结果测量。这些研究共招募了 3267 名参与者。大多数研究在美国进行(n = 27;58.7%),28 项(60.9%)在 2010 年之后进行。其中,27 项 RCT 研究了非药物干预措施,19 项研究了药物干预措施。有效的药物治疗包括金刚烷胺和右美托咪定。有效的非药物干预包括急性期的感官刺激、愤怒自我管理计划、同伴指导、问题解决和情绪调节。心理疗法的证据相互矛盾:本循证综述全面概述了针对创伤后创伤性脑损伤后行为的 RCT 研究情况。这些 RCT 的研究结果对于参与创伤后应激障碍与行为领域研究的医护专业人员、研究人员和政策制定者可能很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
期刊最新文献
Reciprocal Causation Among Pain, Physical Health, and Mental Health 1 Year Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cross-Lagged Panel Model From the TRACK-TBI Study. Association of Frailty, Comorbidities and Muscularity With GOS and 30-Day Mortality After TBI in Elderly Patients-A Retrospective Study in 1104 Patients. Relationships Between Neighborhood Disadvantage, Race/Ethnicity, and Neurobehavioral Symptoms Among Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Cross-Lagged Associations Among Sleep, Headache, and Pain in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An A-CAP Study. Evaluating the Implementation of an Occupational Therapy-Led Concussion Clinic Model Into Usual Practice: A Mixed Methods Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1