Correlation between ultrasonographic and cytologic features of thyroid nodules: a single-center cross-sectional study.

Q3 Medicine Journal of Medicine and Life Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.25122/jml-2024-0038
Imane Ziani, Anouar Jamal, Imane Assarrar, Ikram Karabila, Siham Rouf, Hanane Latrech
{"title":"Correlation between ultrasonographic and cytologic features of thyroid nodules: a single-center cross-sectional study.","authors":"Imane Ziani, Anouar Jamal, Imane Assarrar, Ikram Karabila, Siham Rouf, Hanane Latrech","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A thyroid nodule is managed according to the clinical context, ultrasound (US) findings, and fine needle aspiration (FNA) results. Most thyroid nodules are benign; however, nodule classification is crucial to avoid unnecessary thyroid surgery. We conducted this study to compare the findings of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) expressed using the Bethesda system with the features of thyroid US classified using the EU-TIRADS classification to assess the risk of malignancy. A descriptive and analytical study involving 99 patients with thyroid nodules followed up in the Department of Endocrinology-Diabetology and Nutrition. Data were collected from medical records and analyzed using SPSS software V21. FNA was performed on 121 nodules using the BETHESDA system. These nodules were classified as malignant, suspicious for follicular neoplasm, and suspicious for malignancy in 5.8%, 5%, and 1.7% of cases, respectively. As for the EU-TIRADS 2017 classification, 59.5% of benign nodules were classified as EU-TIRADS III, whereas 66.7% of malignant nodules were classified as EU-TIRADS V and significantly related to malignant prediction (<i>P</i> = 0.000). The size of nodules was significantly correlated to the risk of malignancy (<i>P</i> = 0.013). Seventy-five percent of nodules with central vascularity were malignant (<i>P</i> = 0.012). Irregularity of nodule contours was significantly associated with the risk of malignancy, as 30% of nodules with irregular contours were Bethesda VI (<i>P</i> = 0.003). Hypoechogenicity was found in 77.8% of malignant nodules (<i>P</i> = 0.004). Additionally, only 9.2% of the nodules were taller than wide, of which 37.5% were malignant (<i>P</i> = 0.012). For a safe management strategy, US-guided FNAC should be performed on each suspicious thyroid nodule, given the correlation between EU-TIRADS classification features and the risk of malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 6","pages":"593-600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A thyroid nodule is managed according to the clinical context, ultrasound (US) findings, and fine needle aspiration (FNA) results. Most thyroid nodules are benign; however, nodule classification is crucial to avoid unnecessary thyroid surgery. We conducted this study to compare the findings of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) expressed using the Bethesda system with the features of thyroid US classified using the EU-TIRADS classification to assess the risk of malignancy. A descriptive and analytical study involving 99 patients with thyroid nodules followed up in the Department of Endocrinology-Diabetology and Nutrition. Data were collected from medical records and analyzed using SPSS software V21. FNA was performed on 121 nodules using the BETHESDA system. These nodules were classified as malignant, suspicious for follicular neoplasm, and suspicious for malignancy in 5.8%, 5%, and 1.7% of cases, respectively. As for the EU-TIRADS 2017 classification, 59.5% of benign nodules were classified as EU-TIRADS III, whereas 66.7% of malignant nodules were classified as EU-TIRADS V and significantly related to malignant prediction (P = 0.000). The size of nodules was significantly correlated to the risk of malignancy (P = 0.013). Seventy-five percent of nodules with central vascularity were malignant (P = 0.012). Irregularity of nodule contours was significantly associated with the risk of malignancy, as 30% of nodules with irregular contours were Bethesda VI (P = 0.003). Hypoechogenicity was found in 77.8% of malignant nodules (P = 0.004). Additionally, only 9.2% of the nodules were taller than wide, of which 37.5% were malignant (P = 0.012). For a safe management strategy, US-guided FNAC should be performed on each suspicious thyroid nodule, given the correlation between EU-TIRADS classification features and the risk of malignancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺结节的超声和细胞学特征之间的相关性:一项单中心横断面研究。
甲状腺结节根据临床情况、超声(US)检查结果和细针穿刺(FNA)结果进行处理。大多数甲状腺结节是良性的,但结节分类对于避免不必要的甲状腺手术至关重要。我们开展了这项研究,比较使用贝塞斯达系统表示的细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)结果和使用欧盟-TIRADS分类法分类的甲状腺 US 特征,以评估恶性风险。这是一项描述性和分析性研究,涉及内分泌学、糖尿病学和营养学部门随访的 99 名甲状腺结节患者。研究人员从病历中收集数据,并使用 SPSS 软件 V21 进行分析。使用 BETHESDA 系统对 121 个结节进行了 FNA 检查。这些结节中分别有 5.8%、5% 和 1.7% 的病例被归类为恶性、疑似滤泡性肿瘤和疑似恶性肿瘤。至于EU-TIRADS 2017分类,59.5%的良性结节被归类为EU-TIRADS III,而66.7%的恶性结节被归类为EU-TIRADS V,并与恶性预测显著相关(P = 0.000)。结节的大小与恶性风险明显相关(P = 0.013)。75%有中央血管的结节为恶性(P = 0.012)。结节轮廓不规则与恶性风险显著相关,轮廓不规则的结节中有 30% 为 Bethesda VI(P = 0.003)。77.8%的恶性结节存在低糜烂性(P = 0.004)。此外,只有 9.2% 的结节高度大于宽度,其中 37.5% 为恶性(P = 0.012)。考虑到EU-TIRADS分类特征与恶性风险之间的相关性,为采取安全的管理策略,应对每个可疑甲状腺结节进行US引导下的FNAC检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
期刊最新文献
Akkermansia muciniphila in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. A homozygous nonsense mutation identified in COL7A1 in a family with autosomal recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Associations between ocular biometry and anthropometric measurements among Sudanese adults. Complications and benefits of enteral feeding in children with progressive neurological disease in a palliative care service: a retrospective study. Investigating the association between resilience and impostor syndrome in undergraduate nursing and medical students: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1