Dana Bodnar, Anca Silvia Dumitriu, Ioana Suciu, Bogdan Dimitriu, Mihaela Chirilă, Ruxandra Bartok, Mihai Ciocârdel, Ana Maria Cristina Țâncu, Dan Straja
{"title":"Microscopic and statistical evaluation of the marginal defects of composite restorations: in vitro studies.","authors":"Dana Bodnar, Anca Silvia Dumitriu, Ioana Suciu, Bogdan Dimitriu, Mihaela Chirilă, Ruxandra Bartok, Mihai Ciocârdel, Ana Maria Cristina Țâncu, Dan Straja","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the quality of dental restorations using laboratory microscopic techniques, focusing on the positioning of restorations relative to cavity edges and identifying common errors, such as incomplete or excessive coronal restorations. A total of 41 extracted lateral teeth, previously treated in vivo with Class I or II composites, were analyzed. Thirty-three of these teeth were sectioned medio-distally or buccal-orally and examined under a research laboratory microscope. Marginal areas were measured using eyepieces with a graduated scale and calibration slide, and a frequency statistical analysis was conducted. The analysis revealed that the teeth had fractious edges, deficient marginal closure, excess composite, incorrectly restored occlusal cusps, and marginal adaptation errors, with approximately half of these errors involving excess material. It was observed that restoration procedures in distal areas are particularly challenging, and clinical errors with excess material occur more frequently than those with a deficit. These findings underscore the need for improved techniques and precision in dental restorations to minimize such errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 6","pages":"625-633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the quality of dental restorations using laboratory microscopic techniques, focusing on the positioning of restorations relative to cavity edges and identifying common errors, such as incomplete or excessive coronal restorations. A total of 41 extracted lateral teeth, previously treated in vivo with Class I or II composites, were analyzed. Thirty-three of these teeth were sectioned medio-distally or buccal-orally and examined under a research laboratory microscope. Marginal areas were measured using eyepieces with a graduated scale and calibration slide, and a frequency statistical analysis was conducted. The analysis revealed that the teeth had fractious edges, deficient marginal closure, excess composite, incorrectly restored occlusal cusps, and marginal adaptation errors, with approximately half of these errors involving excess material. It was observed that restoration procedures in distal areas are particularly challenging, and clinical errors with excess material occur more frequently than those with a deficit. These findings underscore the need for improved techniques and precision in dental restorations to minimize such errors.
本研究旨在利用实验室显微技术评估牙科修复体的质量,重点关注修复体相对于龋洞边缘的位置,并找出常见的错误,如冠状修复体不完整或过多。共分析了 41 颗以前用 I 级或 II 级复合材料在体内处理过的拔出侧牙。对其中的 33 颗牙齿进行了中-远侧或颊-口侧切片,并在研究实验室的显微镜下进行了检查。使用带刻度的目镜和校准载玻片测量边缘区域,并进行频率统计分析。分析结果显示,这些牙齿存在边缘折裂、边缘封闭不足、复合材料过量、咬合尖部修复不正确以及边缘适应错误等问题,其中约一半的错误涉及材料过量。据观察,远端区域的修复程序尤其具有挑战性,而材料过量的临床错误比材料不足的错误发生得更频繁。这些发现强调了改进牙科修复技术和精确度的必要性,以尽量减少此类错误。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.