Short- and long-term cost-effectiveness of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in China.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2403940
Yin Shi, Yanwu Zhou, Shuishi Li, Haijing Guan, Shao Liu
{"title":"Short- and long-term cost-effectiveness of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in China.","authors":"Yin Shi, Yanwu Zhou, Shuishi Li, Haijing Guan, Shao Liu","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2403940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Biologics and JAK inhibitors were the most effective innovative systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, their cost-effectiveness in China remains unclear. This study aims to compare both the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness of abrocitinib and dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were developed to simulate the costs and health outcomes of interventions on both short-term and long-term horizons. Short- and long-term horizons were employed to reflect the 26-week induction treatment and model the extended 10-year maintenance treatment period, respectively. The cost-effectiveness of strategies was measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were then compared with the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) that was equivalent to the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of China in 2023 ($12,681 [€11679.26]). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the robustness of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the short-term horizon, the QALYs (quality-adjusted life years) gained were 0.43 for the abrocitinib group and 0.42 for the dupilumab group, with the costs being $2,716.01 (€2501.46) and $3,940.33 (€3629.06), respectively. Over the long-time horizon, abrocitinib therapy yields higher QALYs (6.60 versus 6.53) and incurs a lower cost ($22,765.15 [€20966.81] versus $30,683.38 [€28259.54]) compared to dupilumab. The probability of abrocitinib being cost-effective was nearly 100% under the current WTP. Both short- and long-term results showed that abrocitinib was more effective and less costly than dupilumab, making abrocitinib the dominant option.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abrocitinib was dominant compared to dupilumab both over the short- and long-term horizon for moderate-to-severe AD in China. Future research incorporating real-world evidence and long-term efficacy outcomes could further refine these economic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2403940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Biologics and JAK inhibitors were the most effective innovative systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, their cost-effectiveness in China remains unclear. This study aims to compare both the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness of abrocitinib and dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

Methods: A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were developed to simulate the costs and health outcomes of interventions on both short-term and long-term horizons. Short- and long-term horizons were employed to reflect the 26-week induction treatment and model the extended 10-year maintenance treatment period, respectively. The cost-effectiveness of strategies was measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were then compared with the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) that was equivalent to the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of China in 2023 ($12,681 [€11679.26]). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the robustness of the model.

Results: Over the short-term horizon, the QALYs (quality-adjusted life years) gained were 0.43 for the abrocitinib group and 0.42 for the dupilumab group, with the costs being $2,716.01 (€2501.46) and $3,940.33 (€3629.06), respectively. Over the long-time horizon, abrocitinib therapy yields higher QALYs (6.60 versus 6.53) and incurs a lower cost ($22,765.15 [€20966.81] versus $30,683.38 [€28259.54]) compared to dupilumab. The probability of abrocitinib being cost-effective was nearly 100% under the current WTP. Both short- and long-term results showed that abrocitinib was more effective and less costly than dupilumab, making abrocitinib the dominant option.

Conclusions: Abrocitinib was dominant compared to dupilumab both over the short- and long-term horizon for moderate-to-severe AD in China. Future research incorporating real-world evidence and long-term efficacy outcomes could further refine these economic evaluations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国中重度特应性皮炎成人患者使用阿昔替尼与杜比鲁单抗的短期和长期成本效益。
背景:生物制剂和 JAK 抑制剂是治疗中重度特应性皮炎(AD)最有效的创新性系统疗法。然而,它们在中国的成本效益仍不明确。本研究旨在从中国医疗体系的角度出发,比较阿昔替尼和杜比鲁单抗治疗成人中重度特应性皮炎的短期和长期成本效益:方法:建立混合决策树和马尔可夫模型,模拟短期和长期干预措施的成本和健康结果。短期和长期视角分别反映26周的诱导治疗和10年的延长维持治疗。干预策略的成本效益以增量成本效益比(ICER)来衡量,然后与支付意愿阈值(WTP)进行比较,该阈值相当于 2023 年中国人均国内生产总值(GDP)(12681 美元[11679.26 欧元])。为验证模型的稳健性,进行了单向和概率敏感性分析:在短期范围内,阿罗西替尼组和杜比鲁单抗组获得的QALY(质量调整生命年)分别为0.43和0.42,成本分别为2716.01美元(2501.46欧元)和3940.33美元(3629.06欧元)。在长期范围内,与杜比鲁单抗相比,阿罗西替尼治疗产生的QALY更高(6.60对6.53),成本更低(22765.15美元[20966.81欧元]对30683.38美元[28259.54欧元])。在目前的WTP下,阿昔替尼具有成本效益的概率接近100%。短期和长期结果均显示,与杜比鲁单抗相比,阿昔替尼的疗效更好,成本更低,因此阿昔替尼是最主要的选择:结论:对于中国的中重度AD患者而言,无论在短期还是长期范围内,阿罗西替尼都比杜比鲁单抗更有优势。结合现实世界的证据和长期疗效结果进行的未来研究可进一步完善这些经济评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the value of increasing treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: a plain language summary. Employment status of multiple sclerosis patients in Japan. Relationship between a diagnosis of kidney failure and heart diseases in patients with hyperkalaemia. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of Acalabrutinib versus Ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lung cancer screening program in the netherlands: a simulation based on NELSON and NLST study outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1