Adapting the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire for Acute Care Nurse Practitioners.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of nursing measurement Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1891/JNM-2024-0057
Kristin Hittle Gigli, Kyle Featherston, Lusine Poghosyan
{"title":"Adapting the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire for Acute Care Nurse Practitioners.","authors":"Kristin Hittle Gigli, Kyle Featherston, Lusine Poghosyan","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> This study adapted the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire to measure the organizational climate of nurse practitioners in acute care settings and validated the Nurse Practitioner Acute Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire (NP-ACOCQ). <b>Methods:</b> We used a three-phase instrument adaptation design. In phase 1, experts assessed face and content validity. In phase 2, pilot testing enabled item analysis and preliminary reliability testing. In phase 3, field testing supported exploratory factor analysis. <b>Results:</b> The NP-ACOCQ had a three-factor structure representing subscales. The subscales had Cronbach's alphas of 0.87, 0.90, and 0.94. The subscales, Institutional Visibility, Interprofessional Relationships, and Organizational Autonomy each had between 5 and 13 items. <b>Conclusions:</b> The NP-ACOCQ is a valid and reliable measure to assess organizational factors determining the acute care nurse practitioner work environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2024-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: This study adapted the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire to measure the organizational climate of nurse practitioners in acute care settings and validated the Nurse Practitioner Acute Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire (NP-ACOCQ). Methods: We used a three-phase instrument adaptation design. In phase 1, experts assessed face and content validity. In phase 2, pilot testing enabled item analysis and preliminary reliability testing. In phase 3, field testing supported exploratory factor analysis. Results: The NP-ACOCQ had a three-factor structure representing subscales. The subscales had Cronbach's alphas of 0.87, 0.90, and 0.94. The subscales, Institutional Visibility, Interprofessional Relationships, and Organizational Autonomy each had between 5 and 13 items. Conclusions: The NP-ACOCQ is a valid and reliable measure to assess organizational factors determining the acute care nurse practitioner work environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为急症护理执业护士改编初级护理执业护士组织氛围问卷。
背景和目的:本研究对《执业护士初级护理组织氛围问卷》进行了改编,以测量急症护理环境中执业护士的组织氛围,并验证了《执业护士急症护理组织氛围问卷》(NP-ACOCQ)。方法:我们采用了三阶段工具调整设计。在第一阶段,专家评估了表面效度和内容效度。在第二阶段,通过试点测试进行项目分析和初步可靠性测试。在第三阶段,实地测试支持探索性因素分析。结果:NP-ACOCQ 具有代表子量表的三因素结构。各分量表的 Cronbach 值分别为 0.87、0.90 和 0.94。机构可见性、专业间关系和组织自主性这三个子量表各有 5 至 13 个项目。结论:NP-ACOCQ 是评估决定急症护理执业护士工作环境的组织因素的有效而可靠的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale and Proposed Adaptations. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Foot Health Assessment Instrument in Pregnant Women. Instruments Important to Help Increase Diversity Equity and Inclusion. The Italian Version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey for Mental Health Nurses: A Validity Study. Development of the Followership Evaluation Instrument for Nurses: A Prospective Longitudinal Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1