Functional MRI study with conductivity signal changes during visual stimulation

Abstract

Background

Although blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) is a standard method, major BOLD signals primarily originate from intravascular sources. Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography (MREPT)-based fMRI signals may provide additional insights into electrical activity caused by alterations in ion concentrations and mobilities.

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the neuronal response of conductivity during visual stimulation and compare it with BOLD.

Materials and methods

A total of 30 young, healthy volunteers participated in two independent experiments using BOLD and MREPT techniques with a visual stimulation paradigm at 3 T MRI. The first set of MREPT fMRI data was obtained using a multi-echo spin-echo (SE) echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence from 14 participants. The second set of MREPT fMRI data was collected from 16 participants using both a single-echo SE-EPI and a single-echo three-dimensional (3D) balanced fast-field-echo (bFFE) sequence. We reconstructed the time-course Larmor frequency conductivity to evaluate hemodynamics.

Results

Conductivity values slightly increased during visual stimulation. Activation strengths were consistently stronger with BOLD than with conductivity for both SE-EPI MREPT and bFFE MREPT. Additionally, the activated areas were always larger with BOLD than MREPT. Some participants also exhibited decreased conductivity values during visual stimulations. In Experiment 1, conductivity showed significant differences between the fixation and visual stimulation blocks in the secondary visual cortex (SVC) and cuneus, with conductivity differences of 0.43 % and 0.47 %, respectively. No significant differences in conductivity were found in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) areas between the two blocks. In Experiment 2, significant conductivity differences were observed between the two blocks in the SVC, cuneus, and lingual gyrus for SE-EPI MREPT, with differences of 0.90 %, 0.67 %, and 0.24 %, respectively. Again, no significant differences were found in the CSF areas.

Conclusion

Conductivity values increased slightly during visual stimulation in the visual cortex areas but were much weaker than BOLD responses. The conductivity change during visual stimulation was less than 1 % compared to the fixation block. No significant differences in conductivity were observed between the primary visual cortex (PVC)-CSF and SVC-CSF during fixation and visual stimulations, suggesting that the observed conductivity changes may not be related to CSF changes in the visual cortex but rather to diffusion changes. Future research should explore the potential of MREPT to detect neuronal electrical activity and hemodynamic changes, with further optimization of the MREPT technique.