Laura Stone McGuire, Tatiana Abou-Mrad, Gursant Atwal, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Fady T Charbel
{"title":"Does disease etiology matter in long-term patency in extracranial-intracranial bypass?","authors":"Laura Stone McGuire, Tatiana Abou-Mrad, Gursant Atwal, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Fady T Charbel","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.JNS2414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass has been well described in chronic vaso-occlusive cerebrovascular diseases, including both moyamoya disease (MMD) and atherosclerotic disease (AD). This study aimed to compare factors associated with bypass occlusion between these two diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional database of 357 patients with intracranial bypass procedures performed between August 2001 and May 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with MMD and AD were selected for study. Baseline characteristics, surgical technique, and flow-related measurements were compared in relation to the outcome of bypass occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 232 patients met inclusion criteria (AD, n = 108; MMD, n = 124). The average age and sex differed significantly between groups (AD 57.2 years, 56.5% male; MMD 36.6 years, 31.5% male; p < 0.001). The modified Rankin Scale scores at surgery and at follow-up were higher in the AD group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively), showing a slightly worse baseline functional status, and higher rates of stroke were observed in the AD group by last follow-up (p = 0.005). Patients with AD also were more likely to require an interpositional graft (p < 0.001). At last follow-up, rates of occlusion did not differ between AD and MMD groups (25.2% vs 25.4%, respectively). Of occluded bypasses, the AD group had more occlusions within 1 week compared to MMD (51.9% vs 35.5%, p = 0.176), although the difference was not significant. In patients with more than 1 year of follow-up and in those with more than 2 years of follow-up, MMD tended to have higher rates of occlusion (31.2% vs 26.1% [p = 0.558], and 26.4% vs 20.7% [p = 0.564]). Flow measurements did not differ between AD and MMD groups, but in subgroup analyses of patients with AD and those with MMD, both bypass flow and cut flow index predicted occlusion in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite different disease etiologies treated with bypass, rates of occlusion at last follow-up did not vary between groups, although short-term follow-up would suggest earlier bypass failure in AD, and extended follow-up trended toward higher occlusion rates in MMD. Additionally, patients with AD were more likely to have further occurrences of stroke by last follow-up. Importantly, the bypass flow and cut flow index at the time of surgery predicted occlusion in both AD and MMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.JNS2414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass has been well described in chronic vaso-occlusive cerebrovascular diseases, including both moyamoya disease (MMD) and atherosclerotic disease (AD). This study aimed to compare factors associated with bypass occlusion between these two diseases.
Methods: An institutional database of 357 patients with intracranial bypass procedures performed between August 2001 and May 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with MMD and AD were selected for study. Baseline characteristics, surgical technique, and flow-related measurements were compared in relation to the outcome of bypass occlusion.
Results: A total of 232 patients met inclusion criteria (AD, n = 108; MMD, n = 124). The average age and sex differed significantly between groups (AD 57.2 years, 56.5% male; MMD 36.6 years, 31.5% male; p < 0.001). The modified Rankin Scale scores at surgery and at follow-up were higher in the AD group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively), showing a slightly worse baseline functional status, and higher rates of stroke were observed in the AD group by last follow-up (p = 0.005). Patients with AD also were more likely to require an interpositional graft (p < 0.001). At last follow-up, rates of occlusion did not differ between AD and MMD groups (25.2% vs 25.4%, respectively). Of occluded bypasses, the AD group had more occlusions within 1 week compared to MMD (51.9% vs 35.5%, p = 0.176), although the difference was not significant. In patients with more than 1 year of follow-up and in those with more than 2 years of follow-up, MMD tended to have higher rates of occlusion (31.2% vs 26.1% [p = 0.558], and 26.4% vs 20.7% [p = 0.564]). Flow measurements did not differ between AD and MMD groups, but in subgroup analyses of patients with AD and those with MMD, both bypass flow and cut flow index predicted occlusion in both groups.
Conclusions: Despite different disease etiologies treated with bypass, rates of occlusion at last follow-up did not vary between groups, although short-term follow-up would suggest earlier bypass failure in AD, and extended follow-up trended toward higher occlusion rates in MMD. Additionally, patients with AD were more likely to have further occurrences of stroke by last follow-up. Importantly, the bypass flow and cut flow index at the time of surgery predicted occlusion in both AD and MMD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.