Value of difference in diameters between Pipeline embolization device and parent artery in assessing aneurysm outcome.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.3171/2024.5.JNS232764
Yajing Ma, Hang Zhang, Chao Liu, Xin Deng, Yongjie Yuan, Sheng Guan, Xinbin Guo
{"title":"Value of difference in diameters between Pipeline embolization device and parent artery in assessing aneurysm outcome.","authors":"Yajing Ma, Hang Zhang, Chao Liu, Xin Deng, Yongjie Yuan, Sheng Guan, Xinbin Guo","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.JNS232764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In vitro trials have demonstrated that oversized stents are associated with reduced metal coverage and increased porosity. However, the relationship between stent selection and aneurysm outcome is inconclusive, and determination of this was the authors' purpose in conducting this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients who underwent Pipeline embolization device treatment at the authors' center between January 1, 2018, and June 15, 2023, were enrolled. The authors constructed multiple logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline plots to examine the effect of the difference in diameters between the stent and parent artery (Dd) on aneurysm outcome. The authors also performed stratified analyses. Then, Dd was included in the logistic regression analysis as a categorical variable. The cutoff value for Dd was determined according to the principle of the maximum Youden's index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 302 patients were included in this study. The median Dd was 0.52 mm. With a median follow-up time of 7 months, the aneurysm occlusion rate was 80.1%. The restricted cubic spline plots showed a decreasing aneurysm occlusion rate as Dd increased. After stratification by age and adjunctive embolization, the restricted cubic splines aligned with the results of the main analysis. Compared with the group with a smaller Dd (Dd < 0.3625 mm), the group with a larger Dd showed an OR of 0.439 (p = 0.026). Additionally, patients with diabetes mellitus (OR 0.306, p = 0.018), age ≥ 65 years (OR 0.968, p = 0.03), aneurysm incorporation with a branch (OR 0.253, p < 0.001), and aneurysm neck ≥ 4 mm (OR 0.872, p = 0.003) were independent predictors of aneurysm persistence, whereas Pipeline embolization device plus coiling (OR 4.949, p < 0.001) and smoking history (OR 5.86, p = 0.025) were predictors of aneurysm occlusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors' retrospective analysis demonstrated that the aneurysm occlusion rate declined when Dd increased within a certain range. The authors suggested that Dd with an interval of -0.25 to 0.5 mm may be proper in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.JNS232764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In vitro trials have demonstrated that oversized stents are associated with reduced metal coverage and increased porosity. However, the relationship between stent selection and aneurysm outcome is inconclusive, and determination of this was the authors' purpose in conducting this study.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients who underwent Pipeline embolization device treatment at the authors' center between January 1, 2018, and June 15, 2023, were enrolled. The authors constructed multiple logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline plots to examine the effect of the difference in diameters between the stent and parent artery (Dd) on aneurysm outcome. The authors also performed stratified analyses. Then, Dd was included in the logistic regression analysis as a categorical variable. The cutoff value for Dd was determined according to the principle of the maximum Youden's index.

Results: In total, 302 patients were included in this study. The median Dd was 0.52 mm. With a median follow-up time of 7 months, the aneurysm occlusion rate was 80.1%. The restricted cubic spline plots showed a decreasing aneurysm occlusion rate as Dd increased. After stratification by age and adjunctive embolization, the restricted cubic splines aligned with the results of the main analysis. Compared with the group with a smaller Dd (Dd < 0.3625 mm), the group with a larger Dd showed an OR of 0.439 (p = 0.026). Additionally, patients with diabetes mellitus (OR 0.306, p = 0.018), age ≥ 65 years (OR 0.968, p = 0.03), aneurysm incorporation with a branch (OR 0.253, p < 0.001), and aneurysm neck ≥ 4 mm (OR 0.872, p = 0.003) were independent predictors of aneurysm persistence, whereas Pipeline embolization device plus coiling (OR 4.949, p < 0.001) and smoking history (OR 5.86, p = 0.025) were predictors of aneurysm occlusion.

Conclusions: The authors' retrospective analysis demonstrated that the aneurysm occlusion rate declined when Dd increased within a certain range. The authors suggested that Dd with an interval of -0.25 to 0.5 mm may be proper in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管道栓塞装置与母动脉之间的直径差异在评估动脉瘤预后中的价值。
目的:体外试验表明,过大的支架与金属覆盖率降低和孔隙率增加有关。然而,支架选择与动脉瘤预后之间的关系尚无定论,确定这一点是作者进行这项研究的目的:这是一项单中心回顾性研究。入选患者为 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 15 日期间在作者所在中心接受管道栓塞装置治疗的患者。作者构建了多元逻辑回归模型和限制性立方样条曲线图,以研究支架和母动脉之间的直径差异(Dd)对动脉瘤预后的影响。作者还进行了分层分析。然后,将 Dd 作为分类变量纳入逻辑回归分析。Dd的临界值是根据最大尤登指数原则确定的:本研究共纳入 302 名患者。中位 Dd 为 0.52 毫米。中位随访时间为 7 个月,动脉瘤闭塞率为 80.1%。限制性三次样条曲线图显示,动脉瘤闭塞率随着 Dd 的增加而降低。按年龄和辅助栓塞进行分层后,受限立方样条图与主要分析结果一致。与较小 Dd 组(Dd < 0.3625 mm)相比,较大 Dd 组的 OR 值为 0.439(p = 0.026)。此外,糖尿病患者(OR 0.306,p = 0.018)、年龄≥ 65 岁(OR 0.968,p = 0.03)、动脉瘤合并分支(OR 0.253,p < 0.001)和动脉瘤颈≥ 4 mm(OR 0.872,p = 0.003)是动脉瘤持续存在的独立预测因素,而管道栓塞器加卷曲(OR 4.949,p < 0.001)和吸烟史(OR 5.86,p = 0.025)是动脉瘤闭塞的预测因素:作者的回顾性分析表明,当 Dd 在一定范围内增加时,动脉瘤闭塞率会下降。作者建议,在临床实践中,间隔为-0.25至0.5毫米的Dd可能是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor. Factors related to venous air embolism during semisitting position surgery. Multinuclear thalamic targeting with human stereotactic electroencephalography: surgical technique and nuances. Primary and salvage radiosurgery for neurofibromatosis type 2-associated meningiomas. Safety of early chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A military traumatic brain injury initiative study. The impact of initial vascular morphology on outcomes in patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection presenting with isolated headache.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1