Neele Wüstmann , Verena Humberg , Julia Vieler , Konstantin Seitzer , Sabine von Rüden , Mazen A. Juratli , Andreas Pascher , Marcel Kemper , Annalen Bleckmann , André Franken , Hans Neubauer , Tanja N. Fehm , Martin Bögemann , Katrin Schlack , Andres Jan Schrader , Christof Bernemann
{"title":"Enhancing Biomarker Detection in Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Preanalytical Reverse Transcription Enzymes for Liquid Biopsy Application","authors":"Neele Wüstmann , Verena Humberg , Julia Vieler , Konstantin Seitzer , Sabine von Rüden , Mazen A. Juratli , Andreas Pascher , Marcel Kemper , Annalen Bleckmann , André Franken , Hans Neubauer , Tanja N. Fehm , Martin Bögemann , Katrin Schlack , Andres Jan Schrader , Christof Bernemann","doi":"10.1016/j.labinv.2024.102142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Circulating tumor cells and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers might one day play a crucial role in the treatment decision process for patients of several cancer entities. However, clinical studies on liquid biopsy approaches revealed distinct detection rates and thus, different risk scoring for patients. This study delves into the comparison of 2 utilized reverse transcription enzymes, namely, SuperScript IV VILO (VILO) and Sensiscript (SS), aiming to understand their impact on biomarker detection rates. Prostate cancer cell lines were used to assess detection limits, followed by an investigation of biomarker status in clinical liquid biopsy samples of distinct tumor entities. Our findings highlight the superior reverse transcription efficacy of VILO over SS, commonly used in studies employing the AdnaTest platform. The enhanced efficacy of VILO results in a significantly higher number of patients positive for biomarkers. Clinically, the use of a less-sensitive enzyme system may lead to the misclassification of genuinely biomarker-positive patients, potentially altering their prognosis due to inadequate clinical monitoring or inappropriate treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17930,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Investigation","volume":"104 10","pages":"Article 102142"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023683724018208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers might one day play a crucial role in the treatment decision process for patients of several cancer entities. However, clinical studies on liquid biopsy approaches revealed distinct detection rates and thus, different risk scoring for patients. This study delves into the comparison of 2 utilized reverse transcription enzymes, namely, SuperScript IV VILO (VILO) and Sensiscript (SS), aiming to understand their impact on biomarker detection rates. Prostate cancer cell lines were used to assess detection limits, followed by an investigation of biomarker status in clinical liquid biopsy samples of distinct tumor entities. Our findings highlight the superior reverse transcription efficacy of VILO over SS, commonly used in studies employing the AdnaTest platform. The enhanced efficacy of VILO results in a significantly higher number of patients positive for biomarkers. Clinically, the use of a less-sensitive enzyme system may lead to the misclassification of genuinely biomarker-positive patients, potentially altering their prognosis due to inadequate clinical monitoring or inappropriate treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
Laboratory Investigation is an international journal owned by the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology. Laboratory Investigation offers prompt publication of high-quality original research in all biomedical disciplines relating to the understanding of human disease and the application of new methods to the diagnosis of disease. Both human and experimental studies are welcome.