[Uncertainty in decision-making during multidisciplinary team meetings for colorectal cancer].

Q4 Medicine Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Pub Date : 2024-09-17
Stefan Büttner, Ninos Ayez, Pim B Olthof
{"title":"[Uncertainty in decision-making during multidisciplinary team meetings for colorectal cancer].","authors":"Stefan Büttner, Ninos Ayez, Pim B Olthof","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During multidisciplinary team meetings, treatment plans are discussed for patients with colorectal cancer. Guidelines and protocols guide these decisions, but these are also dependent on the perception of the treatment outcomes by the involved specialists. With the increasing treatment options for increasingly older patients with more comorbidities, predicting outcomes for specific subgroups becomes more challenging. In a survey pertaining to treatment outcomes, we found that surgeons' estimations are not very accurate, especially not for specific risk groups. The limited accuracy of predicted outcomes affects decisions during the multidisciplinary team meetings and during the shared decision-making process in the outpatient clinic. Utilizing existing data-driven as well as innovative AI-enhanced methods to predict outcomes, can help to better inform patients and make both the multidisciplinary team meetings and the shared decision-making more precise.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During multidisciplinary team meetings, treatment plans are discussed for patients with colorectal cancer. Guidelines and protocols guide these decisions, but these are also dependent on the perception of the treatment outcomes by the involved specialists. With the increasing treatment options for increasingly older patients with more comorbidities, predicting outcomes for specific subgroups becomes more challenging. In a survey pertaining to treatment outcomes, we found that surgeons' estimations are not very accurate, especially not for specific risk groups. The limited accuracy of predicted outcomes affects decisions during the multidisciplinary team meetings and during the shared decision-making process in the outpatient clinic. Utilizing existing data-driven as well as innovative AI-enhanced methods to predict outcomes, can help to better inform patients and make both the multidisciplinary team meetings and the shared decision-making more precise.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[大肠癌多学科小组会议决策的不确定性]。
在多学科团队会议上,要讨论结直肠癌患者的治疗计划。指南和方案为这些决定提供指导,但这些决定也取决于相关专家对治疗效果的看法。随着年龄越来越大、合并症越来越多的患者可选择的治疗方案越来越多,预测特定亚组的治疗效果变得更具挑战性。在一项有关治疗效果的调查中,我们发现外科医生的估计并不十分准确,尤其是对特定风险群体的估计。预测结果的准确性有限,这影响了多学科团队会议和门诊共同决策过程中的决策。利用现有的数据驱动和创新的人工智能增强方法来预测结果,有助于更好地为患者提供信息,并使多学科团队会议和共同决策更加精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.
期刊最新文献
[An infant with a neck mass]. [Automatic formula dispensers, relief or risk?] [Dealing with deep uncertainty during a pandemic; make policies adaptive]. [Neurological side-effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors]. [Residency attrition in orthopaedic surgery; an explanatory model based on qualitative research].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1