Letter to Editor, "Giant unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm revealed by intracranial hypertension: is a systematic decompressive hemicraniotomy mandatory?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-02893-0
Hethesh Chellapandian, Sivakamavalli Jeyachandran
{"title":"Letter to Editor, \"Giant unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm revealed by intracranial hypertension: is a systematic decompressive hemicraniotomy mandatory?","authors":"Hethesh Chellapandian, Sivakamavalli Jeyachandran","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-02893-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study by Aboukais et al. (2024) evaluates postoperative outcomes in patients with unruptured giant middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms associated with intracranial hypertension and midline brain shift. Analyzing data from 2012 to 2022, the authors compare surgical approaches, emphasizing the potential benefits of systematic decompressive hemicraniotomy in improving patient outcomes. While the study's findings are valuable, the small sample size and absence of a control group limit its generalizability. The retrospective nature of the study introduces potential biases, and long-term cognitive outcomes are not fully explored. Future research should involve larger, prospective cohorts with control groups, incorporating advanced imaging and monitoring techniques to enhance surgical precision and long-term recovery assessments. This study provides important insights but underscores the need for further investigation to optimize treatment strategies for this complex condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02893-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study by Aboukais et al. (2024) evaluates postoperative outcomes in patients with unruptured giant middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms associated with intracranial hypertension and midline brain shift. Analyzing data from 2012 to 2022, the authors compare surgical approaches, emphasizing the potential benefits of systematic decompressive hemicraniotomy in improving patient outcomes. While the study's findings are valuable, the small sample size and absence of a control group limit its generalizability. The retrospective nature of the study introduces potential biases, and long-term cognitive outcomes are not fully explored. Future research should involve larger, prospective cohorts with control groups, incorporating advanced imaging and monitoring techniques to enhance surgical precision and long-term recovery assessments. This study provides important insights but underscores the need for further investigation to optimize treatment strategies for this complex condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致编辑的信,"颅内高压揭示的巨大未破裂大脑中动脉动脉瘤:是否必须进行系统性减压开颅术?
Aboukais 等人(2024 年)的这项研究评估了伴有颅内高压和脑中线移位的未破裂巨大大脑中动脉 (MCA) 动脉瘤患者的术后效果。作者分析了2012年至2022年的数据,比较了手术方法,强调了系统性减压开颅术在改善患者预后方面的潜在益处。虽然研究结果很有价值,但由于样本量小且没有对照组,其推广性受到了限制。该研究的回顾性质带来了潜在的偏差,对长期认知结果的探讨也不够充分。未来的研究应包括更大规模的前瞻性队列和对照组,并结合先进的成像和监测技术,以提高手术的精确性和长期恢复评估。这项研究提供了重要的见解,但强调了进一步调查的必要性,以优化这一复杂病症的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Advantage and challenges in the use of 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in neurosurgery. Comment on - Is add-on Bevacizumab therapy to Temozolomide and radiotherapy associated with clinical utility for newly diagnosed Glioblastoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comment on "A randomized controlled trial of social media promotion in neurosurgical publishing". Comment on "Comparison of LVIS and enterprise stent-assisted coiling embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study". Comment on "Treatment factors to suppress delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage based on VASOGRADE: multicenter cohort study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1