Leah Setar, Jessica G Lee, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto, Bria M Coates
{"title":"Accuracy and Interpretation of Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring in Critically Ill Children.","authors":"Leah Setar, Jessica G Lee, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto, Bria M Coates","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (Tc co2 ) monitoring can noninvasively assess ventilation by estimating carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) levels in the blood. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Tc co2 monitoring in critically ill children by comparing it to the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (Pa co2 ). In addition, we sought to determine the variation between Tc co2 and Pa co2 acceptable to clinicians to modify patient care and to determine which patient-level factors may affect the accuracy of Tc co2 measurements.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single, quaternary care PICU from July 1, 2012, to August 1, 2020.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Included participants were admitted to the PICU and received noninvasive ventilation support (i.e., continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure), conventional mechanical ventilation, or high-frequency oscillatory or percussive ventilation with Tc co2 measurements obtained within 15 minutes of Pa co2 measurement.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Three thousand four hundred seven paired arterial blood gas and Tc co2 measurements were obtained from 264 patients. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of -4.4 mm Hg (95% CI, -27 to 18.3 mm Hg) for Tc co2 levels against Pa co2 levels on the first measurement pair for each patient, which fell within the acceptable range of ±5 mm Hg stated by surveyed clinicians, albeit with wide limits of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of Tc co2 to diagnose hypercarbia were 93% and 71%, respectively. Vasoactive-Infusion Score (VIS), age, and self-identified Black/African American race confounded the relationship between Tc co2 with Pa co2 but percent fluid overload, weight-for-age, probe location, and severity of illness were not significantly associated with Tc co2 accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tc co2 monitoring may be a useful adjunct to monitor ventilation in children with respiratory failure, but providers must be aware of the limitations to its accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (Tc co2 ) monitoring can noninvasively assess ventilation by estimating carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) levels in the blood. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Tc co2 monitoring in critically ill children by comparing it to the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (Pa co2 ). In addition, we sought to determine the variation between Tc co2 and Pa co2 acceptable to clinicians to modify patient care and to determine which patient-level factors may affect the accuracy of Tc co2 measurements.
Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.
Setting: Single, quaternary care PICU from July 1, 2012, to August 1, 2020.
Patients: Included participants were admitted to the PICU and received noninvasive ventilation support (i.e., continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure), conventional mechanical ventilation, or high-frequency oscillatory or percussive ventilation with Tc co2 measurements obtained within 15 minutes of Pa co2 measurement.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Three thousand four hundred seven paired arterial blood gas and Tc co2 measurements were obtained from 264 patients. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of -4.4 mm Hg (95% CI, -27 to 18.3 mm Hg) for Tc co2 levels against Pa co2 levels on the first measurement pair for each patient, which fell within the acceptable range of ±5 mm Hg stated by surveyed clinicians, albeit with wide limits of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of Tc co2 to diagnose hypercarbia were 93% and 71%, respectively. Vasoactive-Infusion Score (VIS), age, and self-identified Black/African American race confounded the relationship between Tc co2 with Pa co2 but percent fluid overload, weight-for-age, probe location, and severity of illness were not significantly associated with Tc co2 accuracy.
Conclusions: Tc co2 monitoring may be a useful adjunct to monitor ventilation in children with respiratory failure, but providers must be aware of the limitations to its accuracy.
目的:经皮二氧化碳(Tc co2)监测可通过估算血液中的二氧化碳(CO2)水平,对通气进行无创评估。我们旨在通过与动脉二氧化碳分压(Pa co2)进行比较,评估重症儿童经皮二氧化碳监测的准确性。此外,我们还试图确定临床医生可接受的 Tc co2 和 Pa co2 之间的差异,以调整对患者的护理,并确定哪些患者层面的因素可能会影响 Tc co2 测量的准确性:设计:回顾性观察队列研究:背景:2012 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 1 日期间的单一四级护理 PICU:纳入的参与者均入住 PICU 并接受无创通气支持(即持续或双水平气道正压)、常规机械通气或高频振荡或冲击通气,并在 Pa co2 测量后 15 分钟内进行 Tc co2 测量:测量和主要结果对 264 名患者进行了 347 次成对动脉血气和锝 co2 测量。Bland-Altman 分析显示,在每位患者的第一对测量中,锝 co2 水平与 Pa co2 水平的偏差为-4.4 毫米汞柱(95% CI,-27 至 18.3 毫米汞柱),这在接受调查的临床医生所述的±5 毫米汞柱的可接受范围内,尽管一致性范围较宽。Tc co2 诊断高碳酸血症的灵敏度和特异度分别为 93% 和 71%。血管活性灌注评分 (VIS)、年龄和自认的黑人/非裔美国人种族混淆了 Tc co2 与 Pa co2 之间的关系,但液体超负荷百分比、年龄体重、探头位置和病情严重程度与 Tc co2 的准确性无显著关联:Tc co2 监测可能是监测呼吸衰竭患儿通气情况的有用辅助手段,但医疗人员必须意识到其准确性的局限性。
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.