Real-World Evaluation of Asthma Severity Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY OTO Open Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70013
Anyull D B Caballero, Estephania Candelo, Karol Avila-Castano, Alaa Alhalabi, Angela M Donaldson
{"title":"Real-World Evaluation of Asthma Severity Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients.","authors":"Anyull D B Caballero, Estephania Candelo, Karol Avila-Castano, Alaa Alhalabi, Angela M Donaldson","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on asthma severity up to 12 months after surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a history of asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) who underwent ESS between 2013 and 2023 were included. Asthma severity was assessed according to current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, classifying patients into mild, moderate, and severe based on medication requirements. Asthma severity was evaluated up to 3 months prior to ESS and 1-year post-ESS. Patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess differences in asthma severity, medication doses, and number of medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five patients were included, of which 44 (67.7%) had CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and 21 (32.3%) had CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). No significant differences were found in asthma severity pre- and post-ESS (<i>P</i> = .175). Similarly, no differences were found in ICS doses (<i>P</i> = .999), total number of prescribed medications (<i>P</i> = .157) or presence of exacerbations before and after ESS (<i>P</i> = .078). However, a significant increase in time from last rescue inhaler use was noted after ESS, increasing from a median of 6.71 to 23.1 weeks (<i>P</i> = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to assess the impact of ESS on asthma severity in a real-world setting. Our findings suggest that ESS does not impact asthma severity classification. However, it might provide relief of asthma symptoms in the early postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e70013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11409052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on asthma severity up to 12 months after surgical intervention.

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Tertiary care center.

Methods: Patients with a history of asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) who underwent ESS between 2013 and 2023 were included. Asthma severity was assessed according to current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, classifying patients into mild, moderate, and severe based on medication requirements. Asthma severity was evaluated up to 3 months prior to ESS and 1-year post-ESS. Patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess differences in asthma severity, medication doses, and number of medications.

Results: Sixty-five patients were included, of which 44 (67.7%) had CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and 21 (32.3%) had CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). No significant differences were found in asthma severity pre- and post-ESS (P = .175). Similarly, no differences were found in ICS doses (P = .999), total number of prescribed medications (P = .157) or presence of exacerbations before and after ESS (P = .078). However, a significant increase in time from last rescue inhaler use was noted after ESS, increasing from a median of 6.71 to 23.1 weeks (P = .004).

Conclusion: This study is the first to assess the impact of ESS on asthma severity in a real-world setting. Our findings suggest that ESS does not impact asthma severity classification. However, it might provide relief of asthma symptoms in the early postoperative period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对慢性鼻窦炎患者进行内窥镜鼻窦手术后哮喘严重程度的真实世界评估
研究目的本研究旨在评估内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)对手术干预后12个月内哮喘严重程度的影响:研究设计:回顾性队列:地点:三级医疗中心:方法:纳入2013年至2023年期间接受ESS手术的有哮喘和慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)病史的患者。根据现行的全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南对哮喘严重程度进行评估,并根据用药要求将患者分为轻度、中度和重度。ESS前3个月和ESS后1年对哮喘严重程度进行了评估。患有阿司匹林加重呼吸道疾病(AERD)的患者被排除在外。采用 McNemar 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行统计分析,以评估哮喘严重程度、药物剂量和药物数量的差异:结果:共纳入 65 名患者,其中 44 人(67.7%)患有伴有鼻息肉的 CRS(CRSwNP),21 人(32.3%)患有不伴有鼻息肉的 CRS(CRSsNP)。ESS前后的哮喘严重程度无明显差异(P = .175)。同样,ESS 前后的 ICS 剂量(P = .999)、处方药物总数(P = .157)或病情加重情况(P = .078)也无差异。然而,ESS 后距最后一次使用救援吸入器的时间明显增加,从中位数 6.71 周增加到 23.1 周(P = .004):本研究首次评估了ESS在真实世界环境中对哮喘严重程度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,ESS 不会影响哮喘严重程度的分类。不过,它可以在术后早期缓解哮喘症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Concurrent Nasal Symptoms in Non-Rhinogenic Headache. Clinical Efficacy and Outcomes of Electro-Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy in the Management of Sialolithiasis. Coblation Versus Radiofrequency for Tongue Base Reduction in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-analysis. Parathyroid Hormone Fluctuations During Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. Enhancing AI Chatbot Responses in Health Care: The SMART Prompt Structure in Head and Neck Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1