Exploring the contextual assumptions, interventions and outcomes of digital advance care planning systems: A theory of change approach to understand implementation and evaluation.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1177/02692163241280134
Andy Bradshaw, Matthew J Allsop, Jacqueline Birtwistle, Catherine J Evans, Samuel D Relton, Suzanne H Richards, Maureen Twiddy, Robbie Foy, Pablo Millares Martin, Sarah Yardley, Katherine E Sleeman
{"title":"Exploring the contextual assumptions, interventions and outcomes of digital advance care planning systems: A theory of change approach to understand implementation and evaluation.","authors":"Andy Bradshaw, Matthew J Allsop, Jacqueline Birtwistle, Catherine J Evans, Samuel D Relton, Suzanne H Richards, Maureen Twiddy, Robbie Foy, Pablo Millares Martin, Sarah Yardley, Katherine E Sleeman","doi":"10.1177/02692163241280134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital advance care planning systems are used internationally to document and share patients' wishes and preferences to inform care delivery. However, their use is impeded by a limited understanding of factors influencing implementation and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop mid-range programme theory to account for technological, infrastructure and human factor influences on digital advance care planning systems.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Exploratory qualitative research design incorporating Theory of Change workshops that explored contextual assumptions affecting digital advance care planning in practice. A mid-range programme theory was developed through thematic framework analysis using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, generating a conceptual model depicting contextual assumptions, interventions and outcomes influencing implementation.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 38 participants (16 from London, 14 from West Yorkshire and 8 online) including patients, carers and health and care professionals (including those with commissioning responsibilities).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A conceptual model was generated depicting five distinct components relating to digital advance care planning system use: (sociocultural, technical and structural prerequisites; recognition of the clinical need for conversation; having conversations and documenting decisions; accessing, actioning and amending; and using data to support evaluation, use and implementation). There were differences and uncertainty relating to what digital advance care planning systems are, who they are for and how they should be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital advance care planning lacks shared beliefs and practices, despite these being essential for complex technology implementation. Our mid-range programme theory can guide their further development and application by considering technological, infrastructure and human factor influences to optimise their implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2692163241280134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241280134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital advance care planning systems are used internationally to document and share patients' wishes and preferences to inform care delivery. However, their use is impeded by a limited understanding of factors influencing implementation and evaluation.

Aim: To develop mid-range programme theory to account for technological, infrastructure and human factor influences on digital advance care planning systems.

Design: Exploratory qualitative research design incorporating Theory of Change workshops that explored contextual assumptions affecting digital advance care planning in practice. A mid-range programme theory was developed through thematic framework analysis using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, generating a conceptual model depicting contextual assumptions, interventions and outcomes influencing implementation.

Participants: A total of 38 participants (16 from London, 14 from West Yorkshire and 8 online) including patients, carers and health and care professionals (including those with commissioning responsibilities).

Results: A conceptual model was generated depicting five distinct components relating to digital advance care planning system use: (sociocultural, technical and structural prerequisites; recognition of the clinical need for conversation; having conversations and documenting decisions; accessing, actioning and amending; and using data to support evaluation, use and implementation). There were differences and uncertainty relating to what digital advance care planning systems are, who they are for and how they should be evaluated.

Conclusions: Digital advance care planning lacks shared beliefs and practices, despite these being essential for complex technology implementation. Our mid-range programme theory can guide their further development and application by considering technological, infrastructure and human factor influences to optimise their implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索数字化预先护理规划系统的背景假设、干预措施和成果:用变革理论理解实施和评估。
背景:数字预先护理规划系统在国际上被用于记录和分享患者的意愿和偏好,为护理服务提供依据。然而,由于对影响实施和评估的因素了解有限,这些系统的使用受到了阻碍。目标:发展中程方案理论,以解释对数字化预先护理规划系统的技术、基础设施和人为因素的影响:设计:探索性定性研究设计,结合 "变革理论 "研讨会,探讨在实践中影响数字化预先护理规划的背景假设。通过使用 "不采用、放弃、推广、普及和可持续性"(NASSS)框架进行主题框架分析,建立了一个中程计划理论,并生成了一个概念模型,描述了影响实施的背景假设、干预措施和结果:共有 38 名参与者(16 名来自伦敦,14 名来自西约克郡,8 名在线参与者),包括患者、护理人员以及医疗和护理专业人员(包括负责委托的人员):结果:生成了一个概念模型,描述了与数字化预先护理规划系统使用相关的五个不同组成部分:(社会文化、技术和结构前提;认识到对话的临床需求;进行对话和记录决定;访问、行动和修改;以及使用数据支持评估、使用和实施)。在数字化预先护理规划系统是什么、为谁服务以及如何对其进行评估等问题上存在分歧和不确定性:数字化预先护理规划缺乏共同的信念和实践,尽管这些对于复杂技术的实施至关重要。我们的中期计划理论可以通过考虑技术、基础设施和人为因素的影响来指导其进一步开发和应用,从而优化其实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of global patterns in reporting race, ethnicity, nationality, or religion in palliative care randomized controlled trials: Recommendations for transparency. Working with people living with motor neurone disease and the impact on professionals' emotional and psychological well-being: A scoping review. Feasibility and acceptability of the brief patient-reported experience measure consideRATE within the hospital setting for patients with palliative care needs, their families/carers and clinicians. Components of home-based palliative and supportive care for adults with heart failure: A scoping review. We need to talk about social class: Why theories of social class matter for understanding inequities in palliative and end-of-life care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1