The association between bullying victimization and back pain in young people: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY PAIN® Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003398
Nichole Phillips, Benjamin T Brown, Michael P Jones, Natasha Magson, Amber Beynon, Michael S Swain
{"title":"The association between bullying victimization and back pain in young people: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nichole Phillips, Benjamin T Brown, Michael P Jones, Natasha Magson, Amber Beynon, Michael S Swain","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Back pain is a common and recurrent health complaint in adolescence. Psychosocial factors may be associated with the onset and persistence of back pain symptoms. This systematic review aims to determine the association between bullying victimization and back pain in young people. Observational studies that quantified the association between bullying victimization and back pain in participants were included in this systematic review. Estimates of associations and confidence intervals were extracted. A random effects meta-analysis of estimates of association was performed. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Database searches yielded 18,311 citations. Nineteen studies (n = 212,058, 51.4% female) were included in our review. Meta-analysis showed a positive association between bullying victimization and back pain (odds ratio 1.93, confidence interval 1.75-2.13). Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant effect of sex, age, bullying type, pain type, recall periods, bullying frequency, back pain frequency, risk estimate adjustment, and study critical appraisal rating. All studies were rated at moderate-high risk of bias. Our synthesis of evidence found a weak-moderate association between bullying victimization and back pain in young people. Methodological shortcomings and heterogeneity in the field limit causal inference. Future longitudinal studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003398","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Back pain is a common and recurrent health complaint in adolescence. Psychosocial factors may be associated with the onset and persistence of back pain symptoms. This systematic review aims to determine the association between bullying victimization and back pain in young people. Observational studies that quantified the association between bullying victimization and back pain in participants were included in this systematic review. Estimates of associations and confidence intervals were extracted. A random effects meta-analysis of estimates of association was performed. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Database searches yielded 18,311 citations. Nineteen studies (n = 212,058, 51.4% female) were included in our review. Meta-analysis showed a positive association between bullying victimization and back pain (odds ratio 1.93, confidence interval 1.75-2.13). Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant effect of sex, age, bullying type, pain type, recall periods, bullying frequency, back pain frequency, risk estimate adjustment, and study critical appraisal rating. All studies were rated at moderate-high risk of bias. Our synthesis of evidence found a weak-moderate association between bullying victimization and back pain in young people. Methodological shortcomings and heterogeneity in the field limit causal inference. Future longitudinal studies are required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年遭受欺凌与背痛之间的关系:系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
摘要:背痛是青少年常见且反复发作的健康问题。心理社会因素可能与背痛症状的发生和持续有关。本系统综述旨在确定青少年遭受欺凌与背痛之间的关系。本系统性综述纳入了量化欺凌受害与参与者背痛之间关系的观察性研究。研究提取了相关性的估计值和置信区间。对关联估计值进行了随机效应荟萃分析。证据质量采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的分析性横断面研究关键评估清单进行评估。通过数据库检索,共获得 18,311 条引文。19项研究(n = 212 058,51.4% 为女性)被纳入我们的综述。元分析表明,遭受欺凌与背痛之间存在正相关(几率比1.93,置信区间1.75-2.13)。亚组分析表明,性别、年龄、欺凌类型、疼痛类型、回忆期、欺凌频率、背痛频率、风险估计调整和研究批判性评价等级在统计学上没有显著影响。所有研究均被评为中度-高度偏倚风险。我们的证据综述发现,青少年遭受欺凌与背痛之间存在弱-中等程度的关联。该领域的方法缺陷和异质性限制了因果推断。未来需要进行纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Roman-Juan et al. Reply to Wideman et al. The dynamics of pain avoidance: the exploration-exploitation dilemma. Patterns of physiotherapy attendance in compensated Australian workers with low back pain: a retrospective cohort study. The downside to choice: instrumental control increases conditioned nocebo hyperalgesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1