Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage and conventional puncture hematoma drainage in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.8.8833
Xin Gong, Hai-Qing Dong, Xin Li, Zhen-Jie Liu
{"title":"Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage and conventional puncture hematoma drainage in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage.","authors":"Xin Gong, Hai-Qing Dong, Xin Li, Zhen-Jie Liu","doi":"10.12669/pjms.40.8.8833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare and analyze the clinical effectiveness of conventional puncture hematoma drainage and stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage in managing intracerebral hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is clinical comparative research. One hundred and twenty patients with the intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent puncture hematoma drainage in Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from March 2020 to May 2023 were included and were assigned into the control groups(n=60) and experimental groups(n=60) according to different treatment methods. The experimental group underwent stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage, while the control group underwent conventional puncture hematoma drainage treatment. The duration and situation of surgery, levels of inflammatory factors, as well as preoperative and 1-week postoperative GCS scores and NIHSS scores were compared and analyzed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison with the control group, the experimental group exhibited considerably less surgical duration(p=0.00), higher amount of intraoperative blood drainage and hematoma clearance rate(p=0.00). The experimental group possessed a substantially more reduced incidence of complications(10%) in comparison with the control group(25%), with a statistically substantial distinction(p=0.03). After therapy, CRP, TNF-a, and IL-6 degrees were considerably more decreased (p=0.00) in the experimental group in comparison with the control group, while GCS grades were considerably more prominent and NIHSS grades were considerably more reduced (p=0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage is a dependable and safe operative method to treat patients who had intracerebral hemorrhage, resulting in various benefits such as short length of operation, less injury, less inflammatory reaction, high hematoma clear efficiency and satisfactory recovery of neurological function.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11395380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.8.8833","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical effectiveness of conventional puncture hematoma drainage and stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage in managing intracerebral hemorrhage.

Methods: This is clinical comparative research. One hundred and twenty patients with the intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent puncture hematoma drainage in Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from March 2020 to May 2023 were included and were assigned into the control groups(n=60) and experimental groups(n=60) according to different treatment methods. The experimental group underwent stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage, while the control group underwent conventional puncture hematoma drainage treatment. The duration and situation of surgery, levels of inflammatory factors, as well as preoperative and 1-week postoperative GCS scores and NIHSS scores were compared and analyzed between the two groups.

Results: In comparison with the control group, the experimental group exhibited considerably less surgical duration(p=0.00), higher amount of intraoperative blood drainage and hematoma clearance rate(p=0.00). The experimental group possessed a substantially more reduced incidence of complications(10%) in comparison with the control group(25%), with a statistically substantial distinction(p=0.03). After therapy, CRP, TNF-a, and IL-6 degrees were considerably more decreased (p=0.00) in the experimental group in comparison with the control group, while GCS grades were considerably more prominent and NIHSS grades were considerably more reduced (p=0.00).

Conclusion: Stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage is a dependable and safe operative method to treat patients who had intracerebral hemorrhage, resulting in various benefits such as short length of operation, less injury, less inflammatory reaction, high hematoma clear efficiency and satisfactory recovery of neurological function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向机器人引导穿刺血肿引流术与传统穿刺血肿引流术治疗脑出血的临床疗效对比分析。
目的比较分析传统穿刺血肿引流术和立体定向机器人引导穿刺血肿引流术在治疗脑出血中的临床效果:方法:本研究为临床对比研究。纳入2020年3月-2023年5月在保定市第一中心医院接受穿刺血肿引流术的120例脑出血患者,根据治疗方法的不同分为对照组(n=60)和实验组(n=60)。实验组行立体定向机器人引导下穿刺血肿引流术,对照组行常规穿刺血肿引流术。对比分析了两组患者的手术时间、手术情况、炎症因子水平以及术前和术后一周的 GCS 评分和 NIHSS 评分:结果:与对照组相比,实验组手术时间大大缩短(P=0.00),术中引流血量和血肿清除率更高(P=0.00)。实验组并发症发生率(10%)较对照组(25%)大幅降低,差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。治疗后,实验组与对照组相比,CRP、TNF-a和IL-6的含量显著降低(P=0.00),而GCS分级显著提高,NIHSS分级显著降低(P=0.00):立体定向机器人引导下穿刺血肿引流术是治疗脑出血患者可靠、安全的手术方法,具有手术时间短、损伤小、炎症反应轻、血肿清除率高、神经功能恢复满意等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing the antibacterial and surface hardness of glass ionomer cement modified with Salvadora persica and Chlorhexidine: An in vitro study. Genetic Variants in Vitamin-D Metabolism Genes (rs1155563, rs12785878 and rs10500804) among Females with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Genotypes analysis and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans strains isolated from women with vaginal candidiasis in Jordan using PCR targeting 25SrDNA and ALT repeat sequences of the RPS. Impact of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on survival outcomes in patients with unilateral breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of Flood on Breastfeeding Practices at Flood Relief Camps of Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1