NursPainPrevent: A Prospective Observational Study on Pain During a Bed Bath.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.07.009
Bénédicte Lombart, Patricia Cimerman, Céline Guiot, Valérie Gayet, I Sabelle Sanglier, Muriel Sansac, Sandrine Avignon, Emilie Boulet, Florence Lay, Louise Geoffroy, Stéphanie Mauboussin-Carlos, Christian Guy-Coichard, Etienne Guilly, Céline Bouchart
{"title":"NursPainPrevent: A Prospective Observational Study on Pain During a Bed Bath.","authors":"Bénédicte Lombart, Patricia Cimerman, Céline Guiot, Valérie Gayet, I Sabelle Sanglier, Muriel Sansac, Sandrine Avignon, Emilie Boulet, Florence Lay, Louise Geoffroy, Stéphanie Mauboussin-Carlos, Christian Guy-Coichard, Etienne Guilly, Céline Bouchart","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although bed baths are known to cause pain, the engendered pain frequency and intensity remain poorly studied. This prospective, observational study was undertaken to examine prospectively, on a given day, patients' bed bath-associated pain in the general in-hospital population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight external investigators observed 166 bed baths given in 23 units in 5 hospitals. Using validated assessment scales specific to the patients' clinical situations, they established pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert observers rated bed bath-induced pain as moderate-to-severe for 48% of the patients, among whom 51.9% had not received prophylactic analgesia prior to the procedure. Only 7.2% benefited from evaluation with a validated pain scale. Astute attention-distraction techniques were applied to shift attention during 16.8% of the bed baths. Caregivers used verbal guidance for 85% of the procedures, and adapted touch and rhythm of the gestures for 84.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bed baths generate moderate-to-severe pain intensity. Evaluation and recourse to analgesia remain insufficient despite caregivers' attention accorded to patient comfort and positioning.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The results of this study could contribute to sensitizing professionals to preventing pain linked with routine nursing care. Four axes for improvement were highlighted: evaluation improvement, analgesia, nonpharmacological approaches, and adapted mobilization techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.07.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although bed baths are known to cause pain, the engendered pain frequency and intensity remain poorly studied. This prospective, observational study was undertaken to examine prospectively, on a given day, patients' bed bath-associated pain in the general in-hospital population.

Methods: Eight external investigators observed 166 bed baths given in 23 units in 5 hospitals. Using validated assessment scales specific to the patients' clinical situations, they established pain scores.

Results: Expert observers rated bed bath-induced pain as moderate-to-severe for 48% of the patients, among whom 51.9% had not received prophylactic analgesia prior to the procedure. Only 7.2% benefited from evaluation with a validated pain scale. Astute attention-distraction techniques were applied to shift attention during 16.8% of the bed baths. Caregivers used verbal guidance for 85% of the procedures, and adapted touch and rhythm of the gestures for 84.3%.

Conclusion: Bed baths generate moderate-to-severe pain intensity. Evaluation and recourse to analgesia remain insufficient despite caregivers' attention accorded to patient comfort and positioning.

Clinical implications: The results of this study could contribute to sensitizing professionals to preventing pain linked with routine nursing care. Four axes for improvement were highlighted: evaluation improvement, analgesia, nonpharmacological approaches, and adapted mobilization techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理预防疼痛:床上沐浴时疼痛的前瞻性观察研究
背景:尽管众所周知床浴会引起疼痛,但对引起疼痛的频率和强度的研究仍然很少。这项前瞻性观察研究旨在前瞻性地检查特定日期内普通住院患者因床浴引起的疼痛:八名外部调查人员观察了 5 家医院 23 个科室的 166 次床浴。他们根据患者的临床情况使用经过验证的评估量表对疼痛进行评分:结果:专家观察员将 48% 的患者因床浴引起的疼痛评为中度至重度,其中 51.9% 的患者在手术前未接受预防性镇痛。只有 7.2% 的患者接受了有效疼痛量表的评估。在 16.8% 的床浴过程中,护理人员采用了敏锐的注意力分散技术来转移患者的注意力。护理人员在85%的程序中使用了口头指导,在84.3%的程序中调整了触摸和手势的节奏:结论:床浴会产生中度至重度疼痛。结论:床浴会产生中度至重度疼痛,尽管护理人员会关注患者的舒适度和体位,但对疼痛的评估和镇痛措施仍然不足:这项研究的结果有助于提高专业人员对预防与日常护理相关的疼痛的敏感性。研究强调了四个需要改进的方面:改进评估、镇痛、非药物治疗方法和调整移动技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Examining Preliminary Efficacy of a Qigong Intervention in Veterans with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management. Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1