Predictors of response to emotional distress with Single session interventions: using Enhanced Psychoeducation in a crisis situation.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3749
Ana Luiza da Silva Ache, Bruno Braga Montezano, Bruno Paz Mosqueiro, Marco Antonio Caldieraro, Lucas Spanemberg, Giovanni Salum, Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck
{"title":"Predictors of response to emotional distress with Single session interventions: using Enhanced Psychoeducation in a crisis situation.","authors":"Ana Luiza da Silva Ache, Bruno Braga Montezano, Bruno Paz Mosqueiro, Marco Antonio Caldieraro, Lucas Spanemberg, Giovanni Salum, Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-session interventions (SSI) are an effective strategy reducing emotional distress. Enhanced psychoeducation (EP), which includes empathic listening, risk stratification, symptom monitoring, and habit modification is particularly suitable for SSIs. We investigate predictors of response to an online EP intervention among essential service professionals during COVID-19 in Brazil. TELEPSI Project financed by the Ministry of Health of Brazil, nationwide initiative, which served more than 3,300 individuals in various psychotherapeutic modalities. Data from April 2020 to December 2021. We included all participants who received SSIs with high levels of emotional distress. Final sample: 460 subjects, 89.1% female, and 81.1% health professionals. 300 subjects underwent reassessment in one month. Participants with harmful use of social networks, spending time on social media, playing video games, smoking, drinking alcohol, spending time with pets had a less pronounced symptom decrease. Participants who played instruments or already received some psychological treatment showed a greater magnitude of symptom decrease. This highlighted the impact of lifestyle factors on the efficacy of SSIs. These results underscore the importance of considering individual lifestyle factors when implementing SSIs and contribute to growing body of evidence supporting the tailored application of psychoeducational strategies in mental health interventions, particularly in high-stress environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-session interventions (SSI) are an effective strategy reducing emotional distress. Enhanced psychoeducation (EP), which includes empathic listening, risk stratification, symptom monitoring, and habit modification is particularly suitable for SSIs. We investigate predictors of response to an online EP intervention among essential service professionals during COVID-19 in Brazil. TELEPSI Project financed by the Ministry of Health of Brazil, nationwide initiative, which served more than 3,300 individuals in various psychotherapeutic modalities. Data from April 2020 to December 2021. We included all participants who received SSIs with high levels of emotional distress. Final sample: 460 subjects, 89.1% female, and 81.1% health professionals. 300 subjects underwent reassessment in one month. Participants with harmful use of social networks, spending time on social media, playing video games, smoking, drinking alcohol, spending time with pets had a less pronounced symptom decrease. Participants who played instruments or already received some psychological treatment showed a greater magnitude of symptom decrease. This highlighted the impact of lifestyle factors on the efficacy of SSIs. These results underscore the importance of considering individual lifestyle factors when implementing SSIs and contribute to growing body of evidence supporting the tailored application of psychoeducational strategies in mental health interventions, particularly in high-stress environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单次干预对情绪困扰反应的预测因素:在危机情况下使用强化心理教育。
单次会话干预(SSI)是减少情绪困扰的有效策略。强化心理教育(EP)包括移情聆听、风险分层、症状监测和习惯调整,尤其适合单次干预。我们调查了巴西 COVID-19 期间基本服务专业人员对在线 EP 干预反应的预测因素。TELEPSI项目由巴西卫生部资助,在全国范围内开展,通过各种心理治疗模式为3300多人提供了服务。数据时间为 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 12 月。我们纳入了所有接受 SSI 并有高度情绪困扰的参与者。最终样本:460名受试者,89.1%为女性,81.1%为医疗专业人员。300 名受试者在一个月内接受了重新评估。有害使用社交网络、花时间在社交媒体上、玩电子游戏、吸烟、饮酒、花时间与宠物在一起的受试者,其症状减轻的程度不明显。演奏乐器或已经接受过一些心理治疗的参与者症状减轻的幅度更大。这凸显了生活方式因素对 SSI 疗效的影响。这些结果凸显了在实施SSI时考虑个人生活方式因素的重要性,并为越来越多的证据支持在心理健康干预中,尤其是在高压力环境中,有针对性地应用心理教育策略做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry). The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.
期刊最新文献
Item-wise validity study of the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R): self-reported reactions of hospital personnel exposed to a stressful workplace. Adventures of Psychiatry in a General Hospital: A tale of C-L psychiatry origins and resistance in Brazil. Virtual reality, social intelligence, mirror neurons and bipolar spectrum a new perspective. Costs of dementia in Brazil. Signal Mining and Risk Analysis of Olanzapine Adverse Events in the FAERS Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1