[Withdrawal and reintroduction of pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in paediatric patients. Our experience].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Revista de neurologia Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.33588/rn.7906.2024268
P Morte-Coscolín, C Gómez-Sánchez, J López-Pisón, M V Fariña-Jara, F F Martínez-Calvo, R Fernando-Martínez
{"title":"[Withdrawal and reintroduction of pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in paediatric patients. Our experience].","authors":"P Morte-Coscolín, C Gómez-Sánchez, J López-Pisón, M V Fariña-Jara, F F Martínez-Calvo, R Fernando-Martínez","doi":"10.33588/rn.7906.2024268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are many variables to be considered in the withdrawal of treatment for epileptic seizures, which requires a risk-benefit assessment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients in a neuropaediatric practice who required the reintroduction of treatment for epilepsy after its initial withdrawal, and who continue to receive anti-seizure drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three of 57 children whose treatment was withdrawn are currently being administered the treatment as a monotherapy. Attempts at withdrawal were made with 17 patients, with a mean seizure-free period of 26 months; range: 8-47 months (excluding one patient who never stopped presenting seizures). Mean age at the time of the last known data: 16 years; range: 7-28 years. Average time until the first seizure after withdrawal: 12 months; range: 1-82 months. Seizures persist despite the current treatment administered in eight cases. Two or three attempts to withdraw treatment were made in six patients, with a mean seizure-free period of 28.6 months; range: 22-48 months. Mean age at the time of the last known data: 18.68 years; range: 13-37 years. Average time until the first seizure after withdrawal: 8.2 months; range: 1-30 months. They presented seizures after treatment four was reintroduced. 52% of the patients presented seizures while receiving the drug, which was discontinued. The treatment was withdrawn in cases meeting criteria for persistent seizures: three refractory epilepsies, five symptomatic focal epilepsies, four cases with intellectual disability, five adolescent-onset epilepsies, and failures in previous withdrawal in 23 cases and 30 attempts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decision to withdraw treatment must be personalised, and consider the risk of relapse, taking into account efficacy and tolerability, and behaviour and neurodevelopment in particular.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":"79 6","pages":"147-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7906.2024268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are many variables to be considered in the withdrawal of treatment for epileptic seizures, which requires a risk-benefit assessment.

Patients and methods: A retrospective study of patients in a neuropaediatric practice who required the reintroduction of treatment for epilepsy after its initial withdrawal, and who continue to receive anti-seizure drugs.

Results: Twenty-three of 57 children whose treatment was withdrawn are currently being administered the treatment as a monotherapy. Attempts at withdrawal were made with 17 patients, with a mean seizure-free period of 26 months; range: 8-47 months (excluding one patient who never stopped presenting seizures). Mean age at the time of the last known data: 16 years; range: 7-28 years. Average time until the first seizure after withdrawal: 12 months; range: 1-82 months. Seizures persist despite the current treatment administered in eight cases. Two or three attempts to withdraw treatment were made in six patients, with a mean seizure-free period of 28.6 months; range: 22-48 months. Mean age at the time of the last known data: 18.68 years; range: 13-37 years. Average time until the first seizure after withdrawal: 8.2 months; range: 1-30 months. They presented seizures after treatment four was reintroduced. 52% of the patients presented seizures while receiving the drug, which was discontinued. The treatment was withdrawn in cases meeting criteria for persistent seizures: three refractory epilepsies, five symptomatic focal epilepsies, four cases with intellectual disability, five adolescent-onset epilepsies, and failures in previous withdrawal in 23 cases and 30 attempts.

Conclusion: The decision to withdraw treatment must be personalised, and consider the risk of relapse, taking into account efficacy and tolerability, and behaviour and neurodevelopment in particular.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[我们的经验]。我们的经验]。
简介:癫痫发作停药治疗需要考虑许多变量,因此需要进行风险效益评估:对神经儿科诊所中最初停药后需要重新接受治疗的癫痫患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者仍在继续接受抗癫痫药物治疗:结果:在 57 名接受过停药治疗的儿童中,有 23 名目前仍在接受单药治疗。17名患者尝试过停药,无发作期平均为26个月;范围:8-47个月(不包括一名从未停止发作的患者)。最后一次获得已知数据时的平均年龄:16岁;范围:7-28岁:7-28岁。距停药后首次癫痫发作的平均时间:12 个月;范围:7-28 岁:12个月;范围:1-82个月:1-82个月。有 8 例患者尽管接受了当前的治疗,但癫痫仍持续发作。六名患者尝试过两次或三次撤药,无发作期平均为 28.6 个月;范围:22-48 个月。最后一次获得已知数据时的平均年龄:18.68岁;范围:13-37岁:13-37岁。距停药后首次癫痫发作的平均时间:8.2 个月;范围:1-2 个月:8.2个月;范围:1-30个月:1-30个月。他们在重新接受治疗四后出现癫痫发作。52%的患者在接受停药治疗期间出现癫痫发作。符合癫痫持续发作标准的病例中,有3例难治性癫痫、5例症状性局灶性癫痫、4例智力残疾、5例青少年癫痫,以及23例先前停药失败的病例和30例尝试停药的病例:结论:停药决定必须因人而异,并考虑复发风险,同时考虑疗效和耐受性,特别是行为和神经发育情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
期刊最新文献
[Cognition and Long COVID: A PRISMA Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies]. [Neurology in Bohemian Lights]. The Efficacy of Boxing Training on Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [Referral Profile of Adult Patients Attended in the Neuropsychology Consultation at Hospital Universitario La Paz in Madrid from 2018 to 2023]. [Characteristics of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a tertiary hospital].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1