Spinal deformity surgery in Scheuermann's kyphosis versus adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: meta-analysis of complications and clinical outcomes.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00967-z
Mohammad Daher, Rhea Rasquinha, Manjot Singh, Joseph E Nassar, Chibuokem P Ikwuazom, Bassel G Diebo, Alan H Daniels
{"title":"Spinal deformity surgery in Scheuermann's kyphosis versus adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: meta-analysis of complications and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Mohammad Daher, Rhea Rasquinha, Manjot Singh, Joseph E Nassar, Chibuokem P Ikwuazom, Bassel G Diebo, Alan H Daniels","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00967-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK) may be associated with several complications including extended length of stay and unplanned reoperations. Several studies have previously compared postoperative complications and functional outcomes for AIS and SK patients with mixed results. However, a meta-analysis compiling the literature on this topic is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were accessed and explored until April 2024. The extracted data consisted of complications (overall and surgical-site infections [SSI]), readmissions, reoperations, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) score. Mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were used for continuous data and odds ratio (OR) was utilized for dichotomous data were calculated across studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven retrospective articles were included in the meta-analysis, including 4866 patients, with 399 in the SK group and 4467 in the AIS group. SK patients were found to have statistically significantly higher rates of overall complications (OR = 5.41; 95% CI 3.69-7.93, p < .001), SSI (OR = 11.30; 95% CI 6.14-20.82, p < .001), readmissions (OR = 2.81; 95% CI 1.21-6.53, p = 0.02), and reoperations (OR = 7.40; 95% CI 4.76-11.51, p < .001) than AIS patients. However, they had similar SRS-22 scores postoperatively (MD = -0.06; 95% CI -0.16 to 0.04, p = 0.26) despite the SK group having lower SRS-22 scores preoperatively (MD = -0.30; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.18, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis of studies comparing spinal deformity surgery outcomes in AIS and SK patients, SK was associated with more complications, readmissions, and reoperations. SK did have equivalent SRS-22 scores postoperatively to AIS patients, highlighting the benefit of surgical treatment despite higher complication rates. This data may help inform healthcare institutions, payors, and quality monitoring organizations who examine outcomes of pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00967-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK) may be associated with several complications including extended length of stay and unplanned reoperations. Several studies have previously compared postoperative complications and functional outcomes for AIS and SK patients with mixed results. However, a meta-analysis compiling the literature on this topic is lacking.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were accessed and explored until April 2024. The extracted data consisted of complications (overall and surgical-site infections [SSI]), readmissions, reoperations, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) score. Mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were used for continuous data and odds ratio (OR) was utilized for dichotomous data were calculated across studies.

Results: Seven retrospective articles were included in the meta-analysis, including 4866 patients, with 399 in the SK group and 4467 in the AIS group. SK patients were found to have statistically significantly higher rates of overall complications (OR = 5.41; 95% CI 3.69-7.93, p < .001), SSI (OR = 11.30; 95% CI 6.14-20.82, p < .001), readmissions (OR = 2.81; 95% CI 1.21-6.53, p = 0.02), and reoperations (OR = 7.40; 95% CI 4.76-11.51, p < .001) than AIS patients. However, they had similar SRS-22 scores postoperatively (MD = -0.06; 95% CI -0.16 to 0.04, p = 0.26) despite the SK group having lower SRS-22 scores preoperatively (MD = -0.30; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.18, p < .001).

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of studies comparing spinal deformity surgery outcomes in AIS and SK patients, SK was associated with more complications, readmissions, and reoperations. SK did have equivalent SRS-22 scores postoperatively to AIS patients, highlighting the benefit of surgical treatment despite higher complication rates. This data may help inform healthcare institutions, payors, and quality monitoring organizations who examine outcomes of pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舍曼氏脊柱后凸与青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的脊柱畸形手术:并发症和临床结果的荟萃分析。
背景:青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)和谢尔曼氏脊柱侧弯(SK)的手术治疗可能会引起多种并发症,包括住院时间延长和意外再次手术。之前有几项研究比较了 AIS 和 SK 患者的术后并发症和功能预后,结果不一。然而,目前还缺乏对相关文献的荟萃分析:按照 PRISMA 指南,访问并研究了 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Google Scholar(第 1-20 页),直至 2024 年 4 月。提取的数据包括并发症(总并发症和手术部位感染 [SSI])、再入院率、再手术率和脊柱侧凸研究学会-22(SRS-22)评分。连续性数据采用平均差(MD)和 95% CI,二分法数据采用几率比(OR):荟萃分析纳入了七篇回顾性文章,包括 4866 例患者,其中 SK 组 399 例,AIS 组 4467 例。结果发现,SK 组患者的总体并发症发生率明显更高(OR = 5.41;95% CI 3.69-7.93,P 结论:SK 组患者的并发症发生率明显高于 AIS 组:在这项比较 AIS 和 SK 患者脊柱畸形手术结果的荟萃分析研究中,SK 与更多并发症、再入院和再手术有关。SK患者术后的SRS-22评分与AIS患者相当,这说明尽管并发症发生率较高,但手术治疗仍有益处。这些数据可能有助于为医疗机构、付款人和质量监测机构提供信息,帮助他们检查儿童和成人脊柱畸形手术的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
期刊最新文献
Human spinal height growth: a description of normal spine growth patterns and adult spine height prediction from a longitudinal cohort. Making wrong site surgery a "never event" in spinal deformity surgery by use of a "landmark vertebra" to eliminate variability in identifying a target vertebral level. Magnetically controlled growing rods increase 3D true spine length in idiopathic early onset scoliosis patients: results from a multicenter study. Factors contributing to severe scoliosis after open chest surgery for congenital heart disease: a case-control analysis. Zones where reduced implant density leads to correction loss after scoliosis surgery for Lenke 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1