A Precision Mixture Risk Model to Identify Adverse Drug Events in Subpopulations Using a Case-Crossover Design.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Statistics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1002/sim.10216
Yi Shi, Michael T Eadon, Yao Chen, Anna Sun, Yuedi Yang, Chienwei Chiang, Macarius Donneyong, Jing Su, Pengyue Zhang
{"title":"A Precision Mixture Risk Model to Identify Adverse Drug Events in Subpopulations Using a Case-Crossover Design.","authors":"Yi Shi, Michael T Eadon, Yao Chen, Anna Sun, Yuedi Yang, Chienwei Chiang, Macarius Donneyong, Jing Su, Pengyue Zhang","doi":"10.1002/sim.10216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the success of pharmacovigilance studies in detecting signals of adverse drug events (ADEs) from real-world data, the risks of ADEs in subpopulations warrant increased scrutiny to prevent them in vulnerable individuals. Recently, the case-crossover design has been implemented to leverage large-scale administrative claims data for ADE detection, while controlling both observed confounding effects and short-term fixed unobserved confounding effects. Additionally, as the case-crossover design only includes cases, subpopulations can be conveniently derived. In this manuscript, we propose a precision mixture risk model (PMRM) to identify ADE signals from subpopulations under the case-crossover design. The proposed model is able to identify signals from all ADE-subpopulation-drug combinations, while controlling for false discovery rate (FDR) and confounding effects. We applied the PMRM to an administrative claims data. We identified ADE signals in subpopulations defined by demographic variables, comorbidities, and detailed diagnosis codes. Interestingly, certain drugs were associated with a higher risk of ADE only in subpopulations, while these drugs had a neutral association with ADE in the general population. Additionally, the PMRM could control FDR at a desired level and had a higher probability to detect true ADE signals than the widely used McNemar's test. In conclusion, the PMRM is able to identify subpopulation-specific ADE signals from a tremendous number of ADE-subpopulation-drug combinations, while controlling for both FDR and confounding effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5088-5099"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the success of pharmacovigilance studies in detecting signals of adverse drug events (ADEs) from real-world data, the risks of ADEs in subpopulations warrant increased scrutiny to prevent them in vulnerable individuals. Recently, the case-crossover design has been implemented to leverage large-scale administrative claims data for ADE detection, while controlling both observed confounding effects and short-term fixed unobserved confounding effects. Additionally, as the case-crossover design only includes cases, subpopulations can be conveniently derived. In this manuscript, we propose a precision mixture risk model (PMRM) to identify ADE signals from subpopulations under the case-crossover design. The proposed model is able to identify signals from all ADE-subpopulation-drug combinations, while controlling for false discovery rate (FDR) and confounding effects. We applied the PMRM to an administrative claims data. We identified ADE signals in subpopulations defined by demographic variables, comorbidities, and detailed diagnosis codes. Interestingly, certain drugs were associated with a higher risk of ADE only in subpopulations, while these drugs had a neutral association with ADE in the general population. Additionally, the PMRM could control FDR at a desired level and had a higher probability to detect true ADE signals than the widely used McNemar's test. In conclusion, the PMRM is able to identify subpopulation-specific ADE signals from a tremendous number of ADE-subpopulation-drug combinations, while controlling for both FDR and confounding effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用病例交叉设计识别亚人群药物不良事件的精确混合风险模型
尽管药物警戒研究成功地从真实世界的数据中发现了药物不良事件(ADEs)的信号,但是亚人群中的 ADEs 风险仍值得加强关注,以防止易受影响的个体发生 ADEs。最近,人们开始采用病例交叉设计来利用大规模行政索赔数据检测 ADE,同时控制观察到的混杂效应和短期固定的未观察到的混杂效应。此外,由于病例交叉设计只包括病例,因此可以方便地得出亚人群。在本手稿中,我们提出了一种精确混合风险模型(PMRM),用于在病例交叉设计下从亚人群中识别 ADE 信号。所提出的模型能够识别来自所有 ADE-亚人群-药物组合的信号,同时控制虚假发现率 (FDR) 和混杂效应。我们将 PMRM 应用于行政索赔数据。我们发现了由人口统计学变量、合并症和详细诊断代码定义的亚人群中的 ADE 信号。有趣的是,某些药物仅在亚人群中与较高的 ADE 风险相关,而在一般人群中,这些药物与 ADE 的关系则是中性的。此外,PMRM 可以将 FDR 控制在理想水平,与广泛使用的 McNemar 检验相比,它检测到真实 ADE 信号的概率更高。总之,PMRM 能够从大量的 ADE-亚人群-药物组合中识别出亚人群特异性 ADE 信号,同时控制 FDR 和混杂效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
期刊最新文献
New Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Algorithms for Correlated Audiometric Data. A Modified Debiased Inverse-Variance Weighted Estimator in Two-Sample Summary-Data Mendelian Randomization. A Brief Introduction on Latent Variable Based Ordinal Regression Models With an Application to Survey Data. Estimands and Cumulative Incidence Function Regression in Clinical Trials: Some New Results on Interpretability and Robustness. Heterogeneous Mediation Analysis for Cox Proportional Hazards Model With Multiple Mediators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1