Evaluation of DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Betel-Quid Use Disorder Using the Addiction Characteristics Defined by American Society of Addiction Medicine.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2403118
Perl Han Lee, Chien-Hung Lee, Chih-Hung Ko
{"title":"Evaluation of DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Betel-Quid Use Disorder Using the Addiction Characteristics Defined by American Society of Addiction Medicine.","authors":"Perl Han Lee, Chien-Hung Lee, Chih-Hung Ko","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2403118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), categorizes betel-quid use disorder (BUD) under <i>Other (Or Unknown) Substance Use Disorder</i>, and the diagnostic criteria used are adapted from those of Substance Use Disorder. Because different substances have different characteristics, an improved set of diagnostic criteria is required to better detect BUD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the different measures of accuracy for DSM-5 BUD by using the addiction characteristics defined by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A certified psychiatrist conducted face-to-face diagnostic interviews. Questionnaires were administered to assess betel-quid use history, patterns of use, and dependence features. All betel-quid users were evaluated for BUD by using the DSM-5 criteria and addiction characteristics defined by the ASAM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for BUD, namely <i>large amount of time spent on obtaining and using betel quid and recovering from betel-quid use</i>, showed the lowest sensitivity of 0.14, lowest diagnostic accuracy of 0.63, and lowest diagnostic odds ratio of 2.61. Another DSM-5 diagnostic criterion, namely <i>continued betel-quid use despite knowledge of physical or psychological problems</i>, had the lowest specificity of 0.49. The diagnostic threshold of five or more DSM-5 BUD criteria showed a sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to evaluate the different measures of accuracy for DSM-5 BUD. Given that each addictive substance has unique addictive characteristics, the composition and number of criteria for diagnosing DSM-5 BUD must be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2403118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), categorizes betel-quid use disorder (BUD) under Other (Or Unknown) Substance Use Disorder, and the diagnostic criteria used are adapted from those of Substance Use Disorder. Because different substances have different characteristics, an improved set of diagnostic criteria is required to better detect BUD.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the different measures of accuracy for DSM-5 BUD by using the addiction characteristics defined by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM).

Methods: A certified psychiatrist conducted face-to-face diagnostic interviews. Questionnaires were administered to assess betel-quid use history, patterns of use, and dependence features. All betel-quid users were evaluated for BUD by using the DSM-5 criteria and addiction characteristics defined by the ASAM.

Results: One of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for BUD, namely large amount of time spent on obtaining and using betel quid and recovering from betel-quid use, showed the lowest sensitivity of 0.14, lowest diagnostic accuracy of 0.63, and lowest diagnostic odds ratio of 2.61. Another DSM-5 diagnostic criterion, namely continued betel-quid use despite knowledge of physical or psychological problems, had the lowest specificity of 0.49. The diagnostic threshold of five or more DSM-5 BUD criteria showed a sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.97.

Conclusions: This study is the first to evaluate the different measures of accuracy for DSM-5 BUD. Given that each addictive substance has unique addictive characteristics, the composition and number of criteria for diagnosing DSM-5 BUD must be reconsidered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用美国成瘾医学会定义的成瘾特征评估 DSM-5 诊断标准中的槟榔使用障碍。
背景:精神疾病诊断与统计手册第五版》(DSM-5)将槟榔液使用障碍(BUD)归类为其他(或未知)物质使用障碍,所使用的诊断标准改编自物质使用障碍的诊断标准。由于不同的物质具有不同的特征,因此需要一套改进的诊断标准来更好地检测 BUD:本研究的目的是通过使用美国成瘾医学会(ASAM)定义的成瘾特征来检查 DSM-5 BUD 的不同准确性测量方法:方法:由经认证的精神科医生进行面对面的诊断访谈。方法:由一名经过认证的精神科医生进行面对面的诊断访谈,并发放调查问卷以评估槟榔液的使用历史、使用模式和依赖特征。根据DSM-5标准和ASAM定义的成瘾特征,对所有槟榔屿使用者进行了BUD评估:DSM-5对BUD的诊断标准之一,即花费大量时间获取和使用槟榔屿以及从槟榔屿使用中恢复,显示出最低的敏感性(0.14)、最低的诊断准确性(0.63)和最低的诊断几率比(2.61)。DSM-5 的另一个诊断标准,即在知道自己有生理或心理问题的情况下仍继续使用槟榔屿,特异性最低,仅为 0.49。五项或五项以上DSM-5 BUD标准的诊断阈值显示灵敏度为0.86,特异度为0.97:本研究是首次对 DSM-5 BUD 的不同准确性衡量标准进行评估。鉴于每种成瘾物质都具有独特的成瘾特征,因此必须重新考虑 DSM-5 BUD 诊断标准的构成和数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Alcohol, Cannabis, and E-Cigarette Use/Co-Use and Mental Health Among U.S. College Students. Associations of Minority Stressors, Alcohol Use Disorder, Resilience, and HIV Testing Self-Efficacy Among Community-Based Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in a Southern U.S. City: A Causal Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Differentiating the Contribution of Context-Specific Social Influences on Underage Youth's Alcohol Consumption. Flavored Tobacco User Characteristics in U.S. young Adults: Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Use of cannabis for mental health in the Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1