A multicenter observational study assessing the safety, feasibility, and complications of Bonastent in central airway obstruction.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17534666241260235
Nagendra Y Madisi, Sana Ali, Daniel Greenberg, Gowthami Kobbari, Muhammad Salick, Anoosh Parimi, Ziad Boujaoude, Wissam Abouzgheib
{"title":"A multicenter observational study assessing the safety, feasibility, and complications of Bonastent in central airway obstruction.","authors":"Nagendra Y Madisi, Sana Ali, Daniel Greenberg, Gowthami Kobbari, Muhammad Salick, Anoosh Parimi, Ziad Boujaoude, Wissam Abouzgheib","doi":"10.1177/17534666241260235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are increasingly used in the management of both malignant and nonmalignant airway stenosis. There are multiple stents available in the market; however, the current literature on the efficacy and safety of newly available 3rd generation SEMS (Bonastent) is extremely limited and only has data from single center studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the efficacy and early (<7 days) and late (⩾7 days) complications in patients with central airway obstruction (CAO) treated with Bonastent placement at two institutions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of data of consecutive patients who underwent therapeutic bronchoscopy and Bonastent placement at two tertiary care university hospitals between January 2019 and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bonastent deployment was performed in the operating room. Stents were deployed using rigid or flexible bronchoscopy under direct visualization with a flexible bronchoscope and in conjunction with fluoroscopic guidance. We then analyzed the effectiveness, short-term, and long-term complications of Bonastent placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 Bonastents® were placed in 96 patients. The most common etiology of CAO was malignancy, 92.7% (<i>n</i> = 89), followed by excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) and post-intubation tracheal stenosis. Seventy-three patients (76%) had improvement in symptoms or imaging within 7 days of stent placement, including successful liberation from mechanical ventilation in a patient with CAO. Early complications occurred in seven patients (two-airway bleeding, two-mucus plugging that improved with airway clearance, two-stent migrations, and one-cough).Late complications occurred in 23 patients (1-stent migration requiring revision bronchoscopy and replacement of airway stent, 11-mucus plugging, 6-granulation tissue, 2-pneumonia, 1-cough, 1-tumor ingrowth/stent fracture, 1-airway emergency due to excessive granulation tissue obstructing the distal end of the stent and had a failed cricothyroidotomy leading to death). Overall, the early complication rate was 7.3% (7/96) and late complication rate was 23.9% (23/96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study is the first multicenter study that found a good safety profile with a low complication rate after tracheobronchial Bonastent placement with improvement in symptoms soon after stent placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":22884,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"17534666241260235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666241260235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are increasingly used in the management of both malignant and nonmalignant airway stenosis. There are multiple stents available in the market; however, the current literature on the efficacy and safety of newly available 3rd generation SEMS (Bonastent) is extremely limited and only has data from single center studies.

Objectives: To report the efficacy and early (<7 days) and late (⩾7 days) complications in patients with central airway obstruction (CAO) treated with Bonastent placement at two institutions.

Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of data of consecutive patients who underwent therapeutic bronchoscopy and Bonastent placement at two tertiary care university hospitals between January 2019 and November 2023.

Methods: Bonastent deployment was performed in the operating room. Stents were deployed using rigid or flexible bronchoscopy under direct visualization with a flexible bronchoscope and in conjunction with fluoroscopic guidance. We then analyzed the effectiveness, short-term, and long-term complications of Bonastent placement.

Results: A total of 107 Bonastents® were placed in 96 patients. The most common etiology of CAO was malignancy, 92.7% (n = 89), followed by excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) and post-intubation tracheal stenosis. Seventy-three patients (76%) had improvement in symptoms or imaging within 7 days of stent placement, including successful liberation from mechanical ventilation in a patient with CAO. Early complications occurred in seven patients (two-airway bleeding, two-mucus plugging that improved with airway clearance, two-stent migrations, and one-cough).Late complications occurred in 23 patients (1-stent migration requiring revision bronchoscopy and replacement of airway stent, 11-mucus plugging, 6-granulation tissue, 2-pneumonia, 1-cough, 1-tumor ingrowth/stent fracture, 1-airway emergency due to excessive granulation tissue obstructing the distal end of the stent and had a failed cricothyroidotomy leading to death). Overall, the early complication rate was 7.3% (7/96) and late complication rate was 23.9% (23/96).

Conclusion: Our study is the first multicenter study that found a good safety profile with a low complication rate after tracheobronchial Bonastent placement with improvement in symptoms soon after stent placement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项多中心观察研究,评估 Bonastent 用于中央气道阻塞的安全性、可行性和并发症。
背景:自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)越来越多地用于治疗恶性和非恶性气道狭窄。市场上有多种支架可供选择;然而,目前有关第三代 SEMS(Bonastent)疗效和安全性的文献极为有限,且仅有来自单中心研究的数据:目的:报告第三代 SEMS(Bonastent)的疗效和早期安全性:我们对2019年1月至2023年11月期间在两家三级甲等大学医院接受治疗性支气管镜检查和Bonastent置入术的连续患者的数据进行了回顾性分析:Bonastent置入在手术室进行。在柔性支气管镜直视下,结合透视引导,使用刚性或柔性支气管镜置入支架。然后,我们分析了Bonastent置入的有效性、短期和长期并发症:结果:96 名患者共置入了 107 个 Bonastents®。CAO 最常见的病因是恶性肿瘤,占 92.7%(n = 89),其次是过度动态气道塌陷(EDAC)和插管后气管狭窄。73名患者(76%)在支架置入后7天内症状或影像学有所改善,包括一名CAO患者成功脱离机械通气。七名患者出现了早期并发症(两名患者气道出血,两名患者粘液堵塞,但在清理气道后有所改善,两名患者支架移位,一名患者咳嗽)。23例患者出现了晚期并发症(1例支架移位,需要重新进行支气管镜检查并更换气道支架;11例粘液堵塞;6例肉芽组织;2例肺炎;1例咳嗽;1例肿瘤生长/支架断裂;1例因肉芽组织过多阻塞支架远端导致气道急症,环甲膜切开术失败导致死亡)。总体而言,早期并发症发生率为 7.3%(7/96),晚期并发症发生率为 23.9%(23/96):我们的研究是第一项多中心研究,发现气管支气管 Bonastent 置入术后安全性良好,并发症发生率低,且置入支架后症状很快得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of respiratory disease.
期刊最新文献
Potential of phosphodiesterase 4B inhibition in the treatment of progressive pulmonary fibrosis. A real-world study to evaluate effectiveness of mepolizumab in treating severe asthma in Taiwan (REMIT). Association between albumin corrected anion gap and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sleep and breathing in children with Joubert syndrome and a review of other rare congenital hindbrain malformations. Prone positioning during CPAP therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a concise clinical review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1