Recurrence of vesico-ureteral reflux in children: is still the endoscopic injection the best option?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-76
Francesca Nascimben, Isabelle Talon, Consuelo Maldonado, Rossella Angotti, Francesco Molinaro, Raphael Moog, Francois Becmeur
{"title":"Recurrence of vesico-ureteral reflux in children: is still the endoscopic injection the best option?","authors":"Francesca Nascimben, Isabelle Talon, Consuelo Maldonado, Rossella Angotti, Francesco Molinaro, Raphael Moog, Francois Becmeur","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic injection (EI) is a safe treatment for vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) in children, but recurrences are not insignificant. This study aims to show if multiple EI is still the best first line management even if in case of recurrences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients affected by primary VUR, treated with at least one EI and with at least 5 years follow up were included. All general data were analyzed. Recurrence rate after one, two and three EIs were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-one patients (total number =210) were healed after 1 injection, 28 after 2 and 4 after 3 with a global success rate of 91.90%. Recurrence rate is higher in patients older than 3 years old and with IV and V reflux grade. Even if 67.7% of recurrent VUR after one injection was symptomatic, diagnosis of recurrences after multiple EI was mainly radiological. Only 8% of the patients underwent EI need an anti-reflux surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thanks to its low costs and the acceptable recurrence rate, Deflux EI should be proposed as the first therapeutic approach for children affected by VUR, especially in those with low and moderate grades of VUR. Multiple injections could be contraindicated only in older children thank 1 year with high-grade VUR (IV symptomatic and V grade).</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"13 8","pages":"1446-1454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-76","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic injection (EI) is a safe treatment for vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) in children, but recurrences are not insignificant. This study aims to show if multiple EI is still the best first line management even if in case of recurrences.

Methods: All patients affected by primary VUR, treated with at least one EI and with at least 5 years follow up were included. All general data were analyzed. Recurrence rate after one, two and three EIs were calculated.

Results: One hundred and sixty-one patients (total number =210) were healed after 1 injection, 28 after 2 and 4 after 3 with a global success rate of 91.90%. Recurrence rate is higher in patients older than 3 years old and with IV and V reflux grade. Even if 67.7% of recurrent VUR after one injection was symptomatic, diagnosis of recurrences after multiple EI was mainly radiological. Only 8% of the patients underwent EI need an anti-reflux surgery.

Conclusions: Thanks to its low costs and the acceptable recurrence rate, Deflux EI should be proposed as the first therapeutic approach for children affected by VUR, especially in those with low and moderate grades of VUR. Multiple injections could be contraindicated only in older children thank 1 year with high-grade VUR (IV symptomatic and V grade).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童膀胱输尿管反流复发:内窥镜注射仍是最佳选择吗?
背景:内镜注射(EI)是治疗儿童膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)的一种安全方法,但复发率并不低。本研究旨在说明,即使出现复发,多次内镜注射是否仍是最佳的一线治疗方法:方法:纳入所有接受过至少一次 EI 治疗且随访至少 5 年的原发性 VUR 患者。对所有一般数据进行分析。结果:共有 161 名患者(总人数)接受了 EI 治疗:161 名患者(总人数 = 210)在注射 1 次后痊愈,28 人在注射 2 次后痊愈,4 人在注射 3 次后痊愈,总体成功率为 91.90%。3 岁以上、IV 级和 V 级反流的患者复发率较高。即使 67.7% 注射一次后复发的 VUR 是无症状的,但多次 EI 后复发的诊断主要是放射学诊断。只有 8% 接受过 EI 的患者需要进行抗反流手术:结论:由于费用低廉且复发率可接受,应建议将脱流 EI 作为治疗 VUR 患儿的首选方法,尤其是低度和中度 VUR 患儿。只有年龄大于 1 岁、患有高级别 VUR(IV 级无症状和 V 级)的儿童才禁忌多次注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
期刊最新文献
Acquired buried penis: an observational study characterizing the variability in procedural codes reported during surgery. Build your own all-virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic. Comparison of different processed products of Allium tuberosum Rottler for the treatment of mice asthenozoospermia. Cuproptosis-related signature predicts prognosis and indicates tumor immune infiltration in bladder cancer. Efficacy of iodized oil in emergency ultraselective arterial embolization for fatal massive hemorrhage due to renal angiomyolipoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1