Universal azole prophylaxis for prevention of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients transferring care to a center within a highly endemic region.
Kellie J Goodlet, Rhiannon Garcia, Michael D Nailor
{"title":"Universal azole prophylaxis for prevention of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients transferring care to a center within a highly endemic region.","authors":"Kellie J Goodlet, Rhiannon Garcia, Michael D Nailor","doi":"10.1111/tid.14379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coccidioidomycosis may cause severe disseminated disease and mortality among lung transplant recipients. A strategy of lifelong azole prophylaxis was previously associated with low rates of coccidioidomycosis. Whether lung transplant recipients relocating to the Coccidioides endemic region are also at risk and would benefit from antifungal prophylaxis is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lung transplant recipients transplanted at an outside center with low Coccidioides endemicity before relocating for post-transplant follow-up at a transplant center in Phoenix, Arizona from January 2013 to March 2024 were included. The primary outcome was proven or probable coccidioidomycosis per Mycoses Study Group consensus definitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty lung transplant recipients were included, with 62.5% not receiving antifungal prophylaxis at the time of transfer. The median time from transplant to relocation was 34 months. Of those not on prophylaxis, 96% were initiated on azole therapy at the first clinic visit, with 72% prescribed itraconazole. Coccidioides serologic testing was performed in 30% of the cohort, most often in the context of a broad diagnostic work-up for suspected infection during hospitalization. After a median follow-up of 31 months, one case (2.5%) of proven pulmonary coccidioidomycosis was identified, occurring 4.8 years post-transplant and >2 years post-transfer in a cystic fibrosis patient who had a pause in fluconazole prophylaxis for >1 month prior to diagnosis due to gastrointestinal intolerance and access issues. The patient was treated and maintained on isavuconazole without complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Azole antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients relocating to the highly endemic region.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14379","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Coccidioidomycosis may cause severe disseminated disease and mortality among lung transplant recipients. A strategy of lifelong azole prophylaxis was previously associated with low rates of coccidioidomycosis. Whether lung transplant recipients relocating to the Coccidioides endemic region are also at risk and would benefit from antifungal prophylaxis is unknown.
Methods: Lung transplant recipients transplanted at an outside center with low Coccidioides endemicity before relocating for post-transplant follow-up at a transplant center in Phoenix, Arizona from January 2013 to March 2024 were included. The primary outcome was proven or probable coccidioidomycosis per Mycoses Study Group consensus definitions.
Results: Forty lung transplant recipients were included, with 62.5% not receiving antifungal prophylaxis at the time of transfer. The median time from transplant to relocation was 34 months. Of those not on prophylaxis, 96% were initiated on azole therapy at the first clinic visit, with 72% prescribed itraconazole. Coccidioides serologic testing was performed in 30% of the cohort, most often in the context of a broad diagnostic work-up for suspected infection during hospitalization. After a median follow-up of 31 months, one case (2.5%) of proven pulmonary coccidioidomycosis was identified, occurring 4.8 years post-transplant and >2 years post-transfer in a cystic fibrosis patient who had a pause in fluconazole prophylaxis for >1 month prior to diagnosis due to gastrointestinal intolerance and access issues. The patient was treated and maintained on isavuconazole without complications.
Conclusion: Azole antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients relocating to the highly endemic region.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.