Virtual Reality as an Adjunct to Traditional Patient Counseling in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Localized Prostate Cancer

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.025
Eric Qualkenbush , Alan G. Perry , Neal Kumar , Colleen S. Thomas , Raymond W. Pak , Sij Hemal , Ram A. Pathak
{"title":"Virtual Reality as an Adjunct to Traditional Patient Counseling in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Localized Prostate Cancer","authors":"Eric Qualkenbush ,&nbsp;Alan G. Perry ,&nbsp;Neal Kumar ,&nbsp;Colleen S. Thomas ,&nbsp;Raymond W. Pak ,&nbsp;Sij Hemal ,&nbsp;Ram A. Pathak","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the utility of a virtual reality (VR) model constructed using patient-derived clinical imaging to improve patient understanding of localized prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and surgical plan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy were selected and demographic data recorded. Patients completed a questionnaire to assess baseline knowledge of their diagnosis after consultation and shared-decision making with their surgeon. A trained non-clinical staff member then guided the patient through a VR experience to view patient-specific anatomy in a 3-dimensional space. Patients then completed the same questionnaire, followed by an additional post-VR questionnaire evaluating patient satisfaction. Questions 1-7 (patient understanding of prostate cancer and treatment plan) and 11-17 (patient opinion of VR) used a standard Likert scale and Questions 8-10 were multiple choice with 1 correct answer.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 15 patients were included with an average age of 64.1 years. 6 of 7 questions showed an improvement after VR (<em>P</em> &lt;.001). The percentage of correct responses on Questions 8-10 was higher after VR but not statistically significant (<em>P</em> &gt;.13). Mean responses range from 4.3 to 4.8 (Likert scale, 1 through 5) for the post-VR questionnaire, with a mean total of 31.9 out of 35.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This small preliminary investigation of a novel technology to improve the patient experience showed potential as an adjunct to traditional patient counseling. However, due the small sample size and study design, further research is needed to determine the value VR adds to prostate cancer surgical counseling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":"196 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429524008197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the utility of a virtual reality (VR) model constructed using patient-derived clinical imaging to improve patient understanding of localized prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and surgical plan.

Methods

Patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy were selected and demographic data recorded. Patients completed a questionnaire to assess baseline knowledge of their diagnosis after consultation and shared-decision making with their surgeon. A trained non-clinical staff member then guided the patient through a VR experience to view patient-specific anatomy in a 3-dimensional space. Patients then completed the same questionnaire, followed by an additional post-VR questionnaire evaluating patient satisfaction. Questions 1-7 (patient understanding of prostate cancer and treatment plan) and 11-17 (patient opinion of VR) used a standard Likert scale and Questions 8-10 were multiple choice with 1 correct answer.

Results

In total, 15 patients were included with an average age of 64.1 years. 6 of 7 questions showed an improvement after VR (P <.001). The percentage of correct responses on Questions 8-10 was higher after VR but not statistically significant (P >.13). Mean responses range from 4.3 to 4.8 (Likert scale, 1 through 5) for the post-VR questionnaire, with a mean total of 31.9 out of 35.

Conclusion

This small preliminary investigation of a novel technology to improve the patient experience showed potential as an adjunct to traditional patient counseling. However, due the small sample size and study design, further research is needed to determine the value VR adds to prostate cancer surgical counseling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实技术作为传统患者咨询的辅助手段,用于新诊断的局部前列腺癌患者。
目的确定利用患者临床影像建立的虚拟现实(VR)模型的效用,以提高患者对局部前列腺癌(PCa)诊断和手术计划的理解:选择接受机器人根治性前列腺切除术的患者并记录其人口统计学数据。患者在与外科医生进行会诊和共同决策后填写了一份问卷,以评估对其诊断的基本了解程度。然后,一名训练有素的非临床工作人员引导患者进行 VR 体验,在三维空间中查看特定患者的解剖结构。患者随后填写了相同的问卷,并在 VR 体验后填写了一份额外的问卷,以评估患者的满意度。问题 1-7(患者对前列腺癌和治疗计划的理解)和问题 11-17(患者对 VR 的看法)采用标准的李克特量表,问题 8-10 为多项选择,只有一个正确答案:共有 15 名患者参加了调查,平均年龄为 64.1 岁。在 7 个问题中,有 6 个问题显示 VR 后病情有所改善(P0.13)。对 VR 后问卷的平均回答从 4.3 到 4.8(李克特量表,1 到 5)不等,平均总分 31.9(满分 35 分):这项旨在改善患者体验的新型技术的小型初步调查显示,该技术具有辅助传统患者咨询的潜力。然而,由于样本量较小和研究设计的原因,还需要进一步的研究来确定 VR 为前列腺癌手术咨询带来的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of the TAIPEI (TAping Inbetween PEnile Incisions) Technique for Correcting Penile Curvature in Stage Flap Repair. Editorial Comment on "Clinical Predictors of Micro-TESE Success in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia with Complete AZFc Microdeletion". Editorial Comment on "Impact of Planned Research Gap Year on Urology Residency Match Success". Editorial comment on "Transperineal MRI-fusion targeted prostate biopsy utilizing the PrecisionPoint® Transperineal Access System versus a grid template: An assessment of outcomes". Reply to Editorial Comment on "Routine Sperm Cryopreservation before Vasectomy Is Not Cost-Effective and Does Not Increase Live Birth Rates Compared to Surgical Sperm Retrieval or Vasectomy Reversal".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1