Eric Qualkenbush , Alan G. Perry , Neal Kumar , Colleen S. Thomas , Raymond W. Pak , Sij Hemal , Ram A. Pathak
{"title":"Virtual Reality as an Adjunct to Traditional Patient Counseling in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Localized Prostate Cancer","authors":"Eric Qualkenbush , Alan G. Perry , Neal Kumar , Colleen S. Thomas , Raymond W. Pak , Sij Hemal , Ram A. Pathak","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the utility of a virtual reality (VR) model constructed using patient-derived clinical imaging to improve patient understanding of localized prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and surgical plan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy were selected and demographic data recorded. Patients completed a questionnaire to assess baseline knowledge of their diagnosis after consultation and shared-decision making with their surgeon. A trained non-clinical staff member then guided the patient through a VR experience to view patient-specific anatomy in a 3-dimensional space. Patients then completed the same questionnaire, followed by an additional post-VR questionnaire evaluating patient satisfaction. Questions 1-7 (patient understanding of prostate cancer and treatment plan) and 11-17 (patient opinion of VR) used a standard Likert scale and Questions 8-10 were multiple choice with 1 correct answer.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 15 patients were included with an average age of 64.1 years. 6 of 7 questions showed an improvement after VR (<em>P</em> <.001). The percentage of correct responses on Questions 8-10 was higher after VR but not statistically significant (<em>P</em> >.13). Mean responses range from 4.3 to 4.8 (Likert scale, 1 through 5) for the post-VR questionnaire, with a mean total of 31.9 out of 35.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This small preliminary investigation of a novel technology to improve the patient experience showed potential as an adjunct to traditional patient counseling. However, due the small sample size and study design, further research is needed to determine the value VR adds to prostate cancer surgical counseling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":"196 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429524008197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine the utility of a virtual reality (VR) model constructed using patient-derived clinical imaging to improve patient understanding of localized prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and surgical plan.
Methods
Patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy were selected and demographic data recorded. Patients completed a questionnaire to assess baseline knowledge of their diagnosis after consultation and shared-decision making with their surgeon. A trained non-clinical staff member then guided the patient through a VR experience to view patient-specific anatomy in a 3-dimensional space. Patients then completed the same questionnaire, followed by an additional post-VR questionnaire evaluating patient satisfaction. Questions 1-7 (patient understanding of prostate cancer and treatment plan) and 11-17 (patient opinion of VR) used a standard Likert scale and Questions 8-10 were multiple choice with 1 correct answer.
Results
In total, 15 patients were included with an average age of 64.1 years. 6 of 7 questions showed an improvement after VR (P <.001). The percentage of correct responses on Questions 8-10 was higher after VR but not statistically significant (P >.13). Mean responses range from 4.3 to 4.8 (Likert scale, 1 through 5) for the post-VR questionnaire, with a mean total of 31.9 out of 35.
Conclusion
This small preliminary investigation of a novel technology to improve the patient experience showed potential as an adjunct to traditional patient counseling. However, due the small sample size and study design, further research is needed to determine the value VR adds to prostate cancer surgical counseling.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.