"…I Wish Someone Told Me About That…": A Qualitative Assessment of the Educational Needs of Patients Undergoing Cystectomy.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.008
Erica Zeng, Megan Saucke, Bhabna Pati, Alexa Rose, Taviah Levenson, Esra Alagoz, Kyle A Richards
{"title":"\"…I Wish Someone Told Me About That…\": A Qualitative Assessment of the Educational Needs of Patients Undergoing Cystectomy.","authors":"Erica Zeng, Megan Saucke, Bhabna Pati, Alexa Rose, Taviah Levenson, Esra Alagoz, Kyle A Richards","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To utilize patient feedback to identify areas of need for information and ways to improve delivery of education, due to recognition that cystectomy and urinary diversion is a complex operation often overwhelming patients and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 5 focus groups of bladder cancer patients (separated by gender and diversion type) treated with cystectomy and urinary diversion (n = 17). Questions focused on areas of improvement for patient education. Transcripts were analyzed using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift method, with insights directing the creation of a flexible codebook. A team of researchers created thematic summaries from individual codes and performed higher level analyses to characterize salient findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients described ways to improve the content, timing, and format of education. Most patients expressed a desire to receive a list of common patient experiences pre-operatively. Information they wish they had known beforehand included nuances of new urinary routines, sexual dysfunction, complications such as abdominal adhesions or hernias, and details regarding discharge criteria. Patients had differing opinions on what amount of information should be offered before surgery, but most agreed that options for more details available later were ideal. Preferences on formatting of information varied. Overall, an assortment of formats could allow patients to tailor their process to different learning preferences and individual situations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients highlighted key areas for improvement in the breadth, timing, and format of perioperative education. Continued involvement of patients while developing these educational interventions will be pivotal for meeting patient needs and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To utilize patient feedback to identify areas of need for information and ways to improve delivery of education, due to recognition that cystectomy and urinary diversion is a complex operation often overwhelming patients and caregivers.

Methods: We conducted 5 focus groups of bladder cancer patients (separated by gender and diversion type) treated with cystectomy and urinary diversion (n = 17). Questions focused on areas of improvement for patient education. Transcripts were analyzed using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift method, with insights directing the creation of a flexible codebook. A team of researchers created thematic summaries from individual codes and performed higher level analyses to characterize salient findings.

Results: Patients described ways to improve the content, timing, and format of education. Most patients expressed a desire to receive a list of common patient experiences pre-operatively. Information they wish they had known beforehand included nuances of new urinary routines, sexual dysfunction, complications such as abdominal adhesions or hernias, and details regarding discharge criteria. Patients had differing opinions on what amount of information should be offered before surgery, but most agreed that options for more details available later were ideal. Preferences on formatting of information varied. Overall, an assortment of formats could allow patients to tailor their process to different learning preferences and individual situations.

Conclusion: Patients highlighted key areas for improvement in the breadth, timing, and format of perioperative education. Continued involvement of patients while developing these educational interventions will be pivotal for meeting patient needs and improving outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"......我希望有人告诉我......":对膀胱切除术患者教育需求的定性评估》。
目的由于认识到膀胱切除术和尿路改道术是一项复杂的手术,常常令患者和护理人员不知所措,因此利用患者的反馈来确定需要信息的领域以及改进教育的方法:我们对接受膀胱切除术和尿路改道治疗的膀胱癌患者(按性别和改道类型分列)(17 人)进行了 5 次焦点小组讨论。问题主要集中在患者教育需要改进的方面。研究人员采用 "排序与筛选、思考与转换©"方法对记录誊本进行分析,并根据分析结果编制了灵活的编码手册。一组研究人员从单个代码中创建了主题摘要,并进行了更高层次的分析,以描述突出的研究结果:患者描述了改进教育内容、时间和形式的方法。大多数患者表示希望在术前收到一份患者常见经历清单。他们希望事先了解的信息包括新排尿习惯的细微差别、性功能障碍、腹腔粘连或疝气等并发症以及出院标准的详细信息。对于手术前应提供多少信息,患者的意见不尽相同,但大多数患者都认为术后提供更多详细信息是理想的选择。对信息格式的偏好也各不相同。总之,各种形式的信息可以让患者根据不同的学习偏好和个人情况调整自己的学习过程:患者强调了围手术期教育在广度、时间和形式方面需要改进的关键领域。在制定这些教育干预措施时,患者的持续参与对于满足患者需求和改善治疗效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
期刊最新文献
Absence of race/ethnicity reporting in clinical trials of true minimally invasive surgical therapies for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Assessing Attitudes and Confidence in Managing Erectile Dysfunction Among Urology, Internal Medicine, and Family Medicine Providers. Editorial Comment on "Comparing Frailty Indices for Risk Stratification in Urologic Oncology: Which Index to Choose? Letter to the Editor on "Experiences and Outcomes of the Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS) Fellowship Training: Growth in Fellowships Mirrors the Evolution of the Discipline". Editorial Comment on "Application of AI-MR in the Planning of PCNL for Special Types of Complex Upper Urinary Stones:A Pilot Study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1