Pelvicalyceal anatomy and stone related factors as predictors of stone free rate in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stone.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1177/03915603241282754
Tilala Yash Manharlal, Sachin Sharma, Abhilekh Tripathi, Sabyasachi Panda, Amiya Shankar Paul, Sanjay Choudhuri, Samir Swain
{"title":"Pelvicalyceal anatomy and stone related factors as predictors of stone free rate in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stone.","authors":"Tilala Yash Manharlal, Sachin Sharma, Abhilekh Tripathi, Sabyasachi Panda, Amiya Shankar Paul, Sanjay Choudhuri, Samir Swain","doi":"10.1177/03915603241282754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of the present study is to evaluate the various pelvi-calyceal anatomy related and stone related parameters and their influence on stone free rate in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective analysis of records of 206 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones from December 2021 and November 2023.The patients were divided into two groups: stone free group and residual stone group. Various factors like patients' characteristics, stone size, volume, numbers, density, infundibular width, infundibulopelvic angle, operative time, lasing time, type of laser, and retreatment rate were compared between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean stone size in stone free group was 1.1 ± 0.7 cm whereas in residual stones group was 1.7 ± 0.4 cm (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Overall stone free rate was 62.1% (128/206) whereas residual stone rate was 37.9% (78/206). In stone-free group only 2.3% (3/128) of the patients had an acute infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30° whereas in the residual stones group an acute infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30° was found in 58.9% (46/78) of the patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with an infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30°, 93.8% (46/49) had residual stones, whereas infundibulopelvic angle > 30° only 20.1% (32/157) had residual stones (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis has demonstrated that Infundibulopelvic angle and stone size were the only significant factors in predicting stone free rate for lower calyceal stone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infundibulopelvic angle and stone size have significant impact on the stone free rates in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241282754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of the present study is to evaluate the various pelvi-calyceal anatomy related and stone related parameters and their influence on stone free rate in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones.

Methods: The retrospective analysis of records of 206 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones from December 2021 and November 2023.The patients were divided into two groups: stone free group and residual stone group. Various factors like patients' characteristics, stone size, volume, numbers, density, infundibular width, infundibulopelvic angle, operative time, lasing time, type of laser, and retreatment rate were compared between two groups.

Results: The mean stone size in stone free group was 1.1 ± 0.7 cm whereas in residual stones group was 1.7 ± 0.4 cm (p = 0.03). Overall stone free rate was 62.1% (128/206) whereas residual stone rate was 37.9% (78/206). In stone-free group only 2.3% (3/128) of the patients had an acute infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30° whereas in the residual stones group an acute infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30° was found in 58.9% (46/78) of the patients (p < 0.001). Patients with an infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30°, 93.8% (46/49) had residual stones, whereas infundibulopelvic angle > 30° only 20.1% (32/157) had residual stones (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis has demonstrated that Infundibulopelvic angle and stone size were the only significant factors in predicting stone free rate for lower calyceal stone.

Conclusion: Infundibulopelvic angle and stone size have significant impact on the stone free rates in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测逆行肾内手术治疗下肾盏结石的无结石率的肾盂肾盏解剖和结石相关因素
引言本研究旨在评估肾盂-肾盏解剖相关和结石相关的各种参数及其对逆行肾内手术治疗下肾盏结石无石率的影响:回顾性分析2021年12月至2023年11月期间接受逆行肾内手术治疗下盏结石的206例患者的病历。比较两组患者的特征、结石大小、体积、数量、密度、肾底宽度、肾底盆角、手术时间、激光时间、激光类型和再治疗率等各种因素:无结石组的平均结石大小为 1.1 ± 0.7 厘米,而残余结石组为 1.7 ± 0.4 厘米(P = 0.03)。总无结石率为 62.1%(128/206),而残余结石率为 37.9%(78/206)。在无结石组中,只有 2.3% 的患者(3/128)的急性盆底膀胱内角⩽ 30°,而在残余结石组中,58.9% 的患者(46/78)的急性盆底膀胱内角⩽ 30°(p 30°),只有 20.1% 的患者(32/157)有残余结石(p 结论:肾盂下角和结石大小对逆行肾内手术治疗下肾盏结石的无结石率有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Investigating the clinical significance of E2F5 expression in circulating extracellular vesicles in prostate carcinoma. Evaluation of concomitant treatment for Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse, a case-control study in a tertiary hospital in Iran. Determinants of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing medical expulsion therapy for acute renal colic. Short-term effect of mirabegron on female sexual function in women with overactive bladder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1