Aesthetic grading causes food losses without financially benefiting farmers: Micro-level evidence from China's fresh apple supply chain.

IF 3.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Waste Management & Research Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1177/0734242X241280097
Xiangping Jia, Felicitas Schneider, Minghao Ning, Jiping Ding
{"title":"Aesthetic grading causes food losses without financially benefiting farmers: Micro-level evidence from China's fresh apple supply chain.","authors":"Xiangping Jia, Felicitas Schneider, Minghao Ning, Jiping Ding","doi":"10.1177/0734242X241280097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>International literature is lacking quantified information about the impact of raising demands for attractive appearances and the private standards on food loss and associated effects on the economy, the environment and social issues. Given the global scale and significance to food consumption and health, fresh apples were selected for researching the issues. By focusing on China, the major production region of fresh apple in the world where the effects of aesthetic preference and shape abnormality are substantial, the present study aims to gain insights into the on-farm grading processes and different marketing channels for fresh apples in China. It was discovered that 35% of the volume in China's major production areas of fresh apples were graded by aesthetic characteristics such as ripeness, colour, fragrance, bruising, intactness and appealing appearance. About 17.1% of production on average were considered as food losses mainly caused by such grading schemes. Favouring 'perfect' appearance; however, the grading did not yield economic benefits for smallholders. Lastly, direct procurement by supermarkets had a depressive effect on the price of fresh apples at the farm gate. The study has a unique value for global debates and actions against food loss and waste as it quantifies on-farm post-harvest losses of fresh apples by different agri-food chain organizations in China with respect to mass and economic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23671,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management & Research","volume":" ","pages":"734242X241280097"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management & Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241280097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International literature is lacking quantified information about the impact of raising demands for attractive appearances and the private standards on food loss and associated effects on the economy, the environment and social issues. Given the global scale and significance to food consumption and health, fresh apples were selected for researching the issues. By focusing on China, the major production region of fresh apple in the world where the effects of aesthetic preference and shape abnormality are substantial, the present study aims to gain insights into the on-farm grading processes and different marketing channels for fresh apples in China. It was discovered that 35% of the volume in China's major production areas of fresh apples were graded by aesthetic characteristics such as ripeness, colour, fragrance, bruising, intactness and appealing appearance. About 17.1% of production on average were considered as food losses mainly caused by such grading schemes. Favouring 'perfect' appearance; however, the grading did not yield economic benefits for smallholders. Lastly, direct procurement by supermarkets had a depressive effect on the price of fresh apples at the farm gate. The study has a unique value for global debates and actions against food loss and waste as it quantifies on-farm post-harvest losses of fresh apples by different agri-food chain organizations in China with respect to mass and economic value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美观分级会造成食品损失,但不会给果农带来经济利益:来自中国新鲜苹果供应链的微观证据。
国际文献缺乏量化信息,说明对外观吸引力的要求和私人标准的提高对食品损耗的影响,以及对经济、环境和社会问题的相关影响。鉴于鲜苹果的全球规模及其对食品消费和健康的重要性,我们选择了鲜苹果作为研究对象。中国是世界上新鲜苹果的主要产地,审美偏好和形状异常对苹果的影响很大,本研究将重点放在中国,旨在深入了解中国新鲜苹果的农场分级过程和不同的销售渠道。研究发现,在中国的鲜苹果主产区,有 35% 的产量是根据成熟度、色泽、香味、瘀伤、完整度和外观吸引力等审美特征进行分级的。平均约 17.1%的产量被视为食品损失,主要是由此类分级计划造成的。然而,这种分级制度并没有给小农带来经济效益。最后,超市直接采购对农场新鲜苹果的价格产生了抑制作用。这项研究从质量和经济价值的角度量化了中国不同农业食品链组织对新鲜苹果采收后的农场损失,对于全球讨论和采取行动防止食物损失和浪费具有独特的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waste Management & Research
Waste Management & Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
232
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Waste Management & Research (WM&R) publishes peer-reviewed articles relating to both the theory and practice of waste management and research. Published on behalf of the International Solid Waste Association (ISWA) topics include: wastes (focus on solids), processes and technologies, management systems and tools, and policy and regulatory frameworks, sustainable waste management designs, operations, policies or practices.
期刊最新文献
Microplastics' impact on soil health and quality: Effect of incubation time and soil properties in soil fertility and pollution extent under the circular economy concept. A review on European sustainable practices in end-of-life vehicles management. Shifting perceptions of informal operators in the service and value chains: A retrospective of 40 years of observation and advocacy for informal recyclers and waste service providers, through the eyes of five global participant-researchers. Sustainable waste management approach towards efficient resource utilization. Developing WasteSAM: A novel approach for accurate construction waste image segmentation to facilitate efficient recycling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1