Insights into the Medial Pectoral Nerve Transfer for Shoulder Abduction in Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Retrospective Case Series Analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.063
Marcio de Mendonça Cardoso , Ricardo Felipe , Paulo Araujo , Ricardo Gepp , Andreia Gushiken , Enio Comerlato
{"title":"Insights into the Medial Pectoral Nerve Transfer for Shoulder Abduction in Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Retrospective Case Series Analysis","authors":"Marcio de Mendonça Cardoso ,&nbsp;Ricardo Felipe ,&nbsp;Paulo Araujo ,&nbsp;Ricardo Gepp ,&nbsp;Andreia Gushiken ,&nbsp;Enio Comerlato","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Treatment priority in C5, C6, and C7 brachial plexus root avulsion is the recovery of shoulder function through reinnervation of shoulder muscles. The medial pectoral nerve is a potential donor for axillary nerve transfer, but outcomes are sparsely reported. This study reports the results of medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 12 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury (C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion) who underwent medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including electromyography findings, were documented. We assessed postoperative shoulder abduction strength and range of motion. Statistical analyses compared presurgery and postsurgery outcomes and contrasted our results with those from a study using spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Postsurgery, the mean shoulder abduction range of motion was 65.45°, with a median strength of M2. Significant improvement was noted compared to preoperative values. However, outcomes did not significantly surpass those from spinal accessory nerve transfer. Electromyography showed a low incidence of motor unit action potentials in the deltoid.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve did not yield superior results in shoulder abduction and deltoid reinnervation in our group of patients. At present, different nerve donors may also need to be considered for deltoid muscle reinnervation in patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion to achieve better shoulder abduction recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"192 ","pages":"Pages e179-e186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875024016024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Treatment priority in C5, C6, and C7 brachial plexus root avulsion is the recovery of shoulder function through reinnervation of shoulder muscles. The medial pectoral nerve is a potential donor for axillary nerve transfer, but outcomes are sparsely reported. This study reports the results of medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 12 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury (C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion) who underwent medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including electromyography findings, were documented. We assessed postoperative shoulder abduction strength and range of motion. Statistical analyses compared presurgery and postsurgery outcomes and contrasted our results with those from a study using spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve.

Results

Postsurgery, the mean shoulder abduction range of motion was 65.45°, with a median strength of M2. Significant improvement was noted compared to preoperative values. However, outcomes did not significantly surpass those from spinal accessory nerve transfer. Electromyography showed a low incidence of motor unit action potentials in the deltoid.

Conclusions

Medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve did not yield superior results in shoulder abduction and deltoid reinnervation in our group of patients. At present, different nerve donors may also need to be considered for deltoid muscle reinnervation in patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion to achieve better shoulder abduction recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对臂丛神经损伤患者进行内侧胸神经转移以实现肩关节外展的见解:回顾性病例系列分析。
背景:治疗 C5、C6 和 C7 臂丛神经根撕脱伤的首要任务是通过肩部肌肉神经再支配恢复肩部功能。内侧胸神经是腋神经转移的潜在供体,但其结果鲜有报道。本研究报告了胸内侧神经转移至腋神经的结果:我们对12例臂丛神经外伤(C5、C6和C7根撕脱伤)患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受了内侧胸神经转移至腋神经的手术。我们记录了这些患者的社会人口学和临床特征,包括肌电图检查结果。我们评估了术后肩关节外展力量和活动范围。统计分析比较了手术前和手术后的结果,并将我们的结果与一项使用脊髓附属神经转移至肩胛上神经的研究结果进行了对比:手术后,平均肩关节外展活动范围为 65.45°,中位强度为 M2。与术前数值相比,有明显改善。然而,手术效果并没有明显优于脊髓附属神经转移术。肌电图显示三角肌运动单位动作电位发生率较低:结论:在本组患者中,将胸内侧神经转移到腋神经并不能在肩关节外展和三角肌再支配方面取得更好的效果。目前,C5、C6和C7根撕脱伤患者的三角肌再支配可能还需要考虑不同的神经供体,以获得更好的肩外展恢复效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Deep Learning for Lumbar Disc Herniation Diagnosis and Treatment Decision-Making Using Magnetic Resonance Imagings: A Retrospective Study" [World Neurosurgery, Volume 195, March 2025, 123728]. Investigating Prognostic Factors for Primary Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Adults and Elderly Patients with Non-Communicating Hydrocephalus. Measurement of Resource Utilization in Spine Healthcare (RUSH) for Elective Spine Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review. Prediction of Neurological Functional Recovery After Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning and Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography Radiomics. Endoscopic Trans-Costovertebral Approach to Thoracic Discectomy for Central Calcified Disc Herniations, a Technical Note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1