Racial Disparities in Patients with Metastatic Tumors of the Spine: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.064
Jessica Ryvlin, Andrew Brook, Lucas Dziesinski, Nitza Granados, Rose Fluss, Mousa K Hamad, Mitchell S Fourman, Saikiran S Murthy, Yaroslav Gelfand, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Patients with Metastatic Tumors of the Spine: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jessica Ryvlin, Andrew Brook, Lucas Dziesinski, Nitza Granados, Rose Fluss, Mousa K Hamad, Mitchell S Fourman, Saikiran S Murthy, Yaroslav Gelfand, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Disparities in access and delivery of care have been shown to disproportionately affect certain racial groups. Studies have been conducted to assess these disparities within the spinal metastasis population, but the extent of their effects in the setting of other socioeconomic measures remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to understand the effect of racial disparities on outcomes in patients with metastatic spine disease.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>The PRISMA guidelines were followed, where a comprehensive online search was performed using Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Science Direct using MeSH terms related to metastatic spine tumor surgery and racial disparities up to February 2023. Two independent reviewers screened and analyzed articles to include studies assessing the following primary outcomes: clinical presentation, treatment type, postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, survival and/or mortality, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, and advance care planning.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 13 studies were included in final analysis; 12 were retrospective cohort studies (Level of evidence III) and 1 was a prospective study (Level of evidence II). Postoperative complications were the most studied outcome in 46% of studies (6 of 13), followed by survival in 31% (4 of 13), and treatment type also in 31% (4 of 13). Overall, race was found to be significantly associated with at least one evaluated outcome in 69% of studies (9 of 13). Racial disparities were found in the incidence of cord compression, non-routine discharge, and treatment type in patients with metastatic spine disease. No differences were found on rates of post-operative ambulation, advance care planning, readmission, or survival; inconsistent results were seen for postoperative complications and length of stay. Nine studies (69%) included at least one other measure of socioeconomic status in multivariate analysis, with the two most common being insurance type and income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Although some studies suggest race to be associated with presenting characteristics, treatment type and outcome of patients with spinal metastases, there was significant variability in the inclusion of measures of socioeconomic status in study analyses. As such, the association between race and outcomes in oncologic spine surgery remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Disparities in access and delivery of care have been shown to disproportionately affect certain racial groups. Studies have been conducted to assess these disparities within the spinal metastasis population, but the extent of their effects in the setting of other socioeconomic measures remains unclear.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to understand the effect of racial disparities on outcomes in patients with metastatic spine disease.

Evidence review: The PRISMA guidelines were followed, where a comprehensive online search was performed using Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Science Direct using MeSH terms related to metastatic spine tumor surgery and racial disparities up to February 2023. Two independent reviewers screened and analyzed articles to include studies assessing the following primary outcomes: clinical presentation, treatment type, postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, survival and/or mortality, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, and advance care planning.

Findings: A total of 13 studies were included in final analysis; 12 were retrospective cohort studies (Level of evidence III) and 1 was a prospective study (Level of evidence II). Postoperative complications were the most studied outcome in 46% of studies (6 of 13), followed by survival in 31% (4 of 13), and treatment type also in 31% (4 of 13). Overall, race was found to be significantly associated with at least one evaluated outcome in 69% of studies (9 of 13). Racial disparities were found in the incidence of cord compression, non-routine discharge, and treatment type in patients with metastatic spine disease. No differences were found on rates of post-operative ambulation, advance care planning, readmission, or survival; inconsistent results were seen for postoperative complications and length of stay. Nine studies (69%) included at least one other measure of socioeconomic status in multivariate analysis, with the two most common being insurance type and income.

Conclusions and relevance: Although some studies suggest race to be associated with presenting characteristics, treatment type and outcome of patients with spinal metastases, there was significant variability in the inclusion of measures of socioeconomic status in study analyses. As such, the association between race and outcomes in oncologic spine surgery remains unclear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱转移性肿瘤患者的种族差异:系统回顾。
重要性:事实证明,在获得和提供医疗服务方面存在的差异对某些种族群体的影响尤为严重。已有研究对脊柱转移人群中的这些差异进行了评估,但这些差异对其他社会经济因素的影响程度仍不清楚:本研究旨在进行一项系统性综述,以了解种族差异对脊柱转移性疾病患者预后的影响:本研究遵循PRISMA指南,使用Pubmed、Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane、Embase和Science Direct对截至2023年2月与转移性脊柱肿瘤手术和种族差异相关的MeSH术语进行了全面的在线检索。两位独立审稿人对文章进行了筛选和分析,以纳入评估以下主要结果的研究:临床表现、治疗类型、术后并发症、再入院、再次手术、存活率和/或死亡率、住院时间、出院处置和预先护理计划:最终分析共纳入了 13 项研究,其中 12 项为回顾性队列研究(证据等级 III),1 项为前瞻性研究(证据等级 II)。在46%的研究中(13项中的6项),术后并发症是研究最多的结果,其次是存活率(31%,13项中的4项)和治疗类型(31%,13项中的4项)。总体而言,69%的研究(13 项中的 9 项)发现种族与至少一项评估结果有显著相关性。在转移性脊柱疾病患者的脊髓压迫发生率、非例行出院和治疗类型方面发现了种族差异。在术后行走率、预先护理计划、再入院率或存活率方面没有发现差异;在术后并发症和住院时间方面发现了不一致的结果。九项研究(69%)在多变量分析中纳入了至少一项其他社会经济状况指标,其中最常见的两项指标是保险类型和收入:尽管一些研究表明种族与脊柱转移瘤患者的发病特征、治疗类型和预后有关,但在研究分析中纳入社会经济状况指标的情况存在很大差异。因此,脊柱肿瘤手术中种族与疗效之间的关系仍不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review. Plasma estrogen levels and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women. Postural Change Assists Surgical Maneuverability During Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenoma. YouTube® as a Tool for Medical Education: Analyzing Content Quality and Reliability on Chiari Malformation. Evaluation of the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lamina osteotomy replantation assisted by ultrasonic bone scalpel in the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1