{"title":"Therapeutic Measures for Infections Originating from Scalp Incisions Following Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease","authors":"Xiaofei Jia , Jiping Li , Wenjie Zhang , Jing Wei , Yuqing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, infection following DBS surgery is a serious complication that can lead to the recurrence and worsening of Parkinson's symptoms or related hardware reimplantation, causing considerable patient suffering and financial burden.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficiency of different treatment approaches for scalp incision infections after DBS surgery in PD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with PD who experienced scalp infections following DBS at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether affected implants were removed or not. Fisher's exact test was applied to compare the reinfection rates between groups A and B.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In group A, 4 patients underwent debridement only, and all of them experienced reinfection between 2 and 25 months after the initial treatment. In group B, 9 patients underwent debridement and removal of potentially affected implants. Among them, 8 patients underwent reimplantation of the DBS device within 3–6 months after the initial treatment, and no cases of reinfection occurred. However, 1 patient experienced reinfection in the postauricular incision and percutaneous tunnel 5 months after the initial treatment, resulting in the complete removal of the entire DBS system. The reinfection rate in group B (11.11%) was significantly lower than that in group A (100%, <em>P</em> = 0.007).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Scalp incision infections following DBS surgery can affect deep tissues, and the implementation of a comprehensive treatment strategy involving local debridement and removal of potentially affected implants can significantly reduce the risk of infection recurrence and its spread.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"192 ","pages":"Pages e134-e138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875024015900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, infection following DBS surgery is a serious complication that can lead to the recurrence and worsening of Parkinson's symptoms or related hardware reimplantation, causing considerable patient suffering and financial burden.
Objective
This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficiency of different treatment approaches for scalp incision infections after DBS surgery in PD patients.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of patients with PD who experienced scalp infections following DBS at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether affected implants were removed or not. Fisher's exact test was applied to compare the reinfection rates between groups A and B.
Results
In group A, 4 patients underwent debridement only, and all of them experienced reinfection between 2 and 25 months after the initial treatment. In group B, 9 patients underwent debridement and removal of potentially affected implants. Among them, 8 patients underwent reimplantation of the DBS device within 3–6 months after the initial treatment, and no cases of reinfection occurred. However, 1 patient experienced reinfection in the postauricular incision and percutaneous tunnel 5 months after the initial treatment, resulting in the complete removal of the entire DBS system. The reinfection rate in group B (11.11%) was significantly lower than that in group A (100%, P = 0.007).
Conclusions
Scalp incision infections following DBS surgery can affect deep tissues, and the implementation of a comprehensive treatment strategy involving local debridement and removal of potentially affected implants can significantly reduce the risk of infection recurrence and its spread.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS