Bayesian model of tilling wheat confronting climatic and sustainability challenges.

IF 3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-08-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1402098
Qaisar Ali
{"title":"Bayesian model of tilling wheat confronting climatic and sustainability challenges.","authors":"Qaisar Ali","doi":"10.3389/frai.2024.1402098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conventional farming poses threats to sustainable agriculture in growing food demands and increasing flooding risks. This research introduces a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to address these concerns. The model explores tillage adaptation for flood management in soils with varying organic carbon (OC) contents for winter wheat production. Three real soils, emphasizing texture and soil water properties, were sourced from the NETMAP soilscape of the Pang catchment area in Berkshire, United Kingdom. Modified with OC content at four levels (1, 3, 5, 7%), they were modeled alongside relevant variables in a BBN. The Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) simulated datasets across 48 cropping seasons to parameterize the BBN. The study compared tillage effects on wheat yield, surface runoff, and GHG-CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, categorizing model parameters (from lower to higher bands) based on statistical data distribution. Results revealed that NT outperformed CT in the highest parametric category, comparing probabilistic estimates with reduced GHG-CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from \"7.34 to 7.31%\" and cumulative runoff from \"8.52 to 8.50%,\" while yield increased from \"7.46 to 7.56%.\" Conversely, CT exhibited increased emissions from \"7.34 to 7.36%\" and cumulative runoff from \"8.52 to 8.55%,\" along with reduced yield from \"7.46 to 7.35%.\" The BBN model effectively captured uncertainties, offering posterior probability distributions reflecting conditional relationships across variables and offered decision choice for NT favoring soil carbon stocks in winter wheat (highest among soils \"NT.OC-7%PDPG8,\" e.g., 286,634 kg/ha) over CT (lowest in \"CT.OC-3.9%PDPG8,\" e.g., 5,894 kg/ha). On average, NT released minimum GHG- CO<sub>2</sub> emissions to \"3,985 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eqv/ha,\" while CT emitted \"7,415 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eqv/ha.\" Conversely, NT emitted \"8,747 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eqv/ha\" for maximum emissions, while CT emitted \"15,356 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eqv/ha.\" NT resulted in lower surface runoff against CT in all soils and limits runoff generations naturally for flood alleviation with the potential for customized improvement. The study recommends the model for extensive assessments of various spatiotemporal conditions. The research findings align with sustainable development goals, e.g., SDG12 and SDG13 for responsible production and climate actions, respectively, as defined by the Agriculture and Food Organization of the United Nations.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"1402098"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1402098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional farming poses threats to sustainable agriculture in growing food demands and increasing flooding risks. This research introduces a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to address these concerns. The model explores tillage adaptation for flood management in soils with varying organic carbon (OC) contents for winter wheat production. Three real soils, emphasizing texture and soil water properties, were sourced from the NETMAP soilscape of the Pang catchment area in Berkshire, United Kingdom. Modified with OC content at four levels (1, 3, 5, 7%), they were modeled alongside relevant variables in a BBN. The Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) simulated datasets across 48 cropping seasons to parameterize the BBN. The study compared tillage effects on wheat yield, surface runoff, and GHG-CO2 emissions, categorizing model parameters (from lower to higher bands) based on statistical data distribution. Results revealed that NT outperformed CT in the highest parametric category, comparing probabilistic estimates with reduced GHG-CO2 emissions from "7.34 to 7.31%" and cumulative runoff from "8.52 to 8.50%," while yield increased from "7.46 to 7.56%." Conversely, CT exhibited increased emissions from "7.34 to 7.36%" and cumulative runoff from "8.52 to 8.55%," along with reduced yield from "7.46 to 7.35%." The BBN model effectively captured uncertainties, offering posterior probability distributions reflecting conditional relationships across variables and offered decision choice for NT favoring soil carbon stocks in winter wheat (highest among soils "NT.OC-7%PDPG8," e.g., 286,634 kg/ha) over CT (lowest in "CT.OC-3.9%PDPG8," e.g., 5,894 kg/ha). On average, NT released minimum GHG- CO2 emissions to "3,985 kgCO2eqv/ha," while CT emitted "7,415 kgCO2eqv/ha." Conversely, NT emitted "8,747 kgCO2eqv/ha" for maximum emissions, while CT emitted "15,356 kgCO2eqv/ha." NT resulted in lower surface runoff against CT in all soils and limits runoff generations naturally for flood alleviation with the potential for customized improvement. The study recommends the model for extensive assessments of various spatiotemporal conditions. The research findings align with sustainable development goals, e.g., SDG12 and SDG13 for responsible production and climate actions, respectively, as defined by the Agriculture and Food Organization of the United Nations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对气候和可持续性挑战的小麦耕作贝叶斯模型。
传统耕作对可持续农业构成了威胁,因为粮食需求不断增长,洪水风险也在增加。本研究引入贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)来解决这些问题。该模型探讨了冬小麦生产中不同有机碳(OC)含量土壤的耕作对洪水管理的适应性。从英国伯克郡庞集水区的 NETMAP 土壤图谱中选取了三种真实土壤,强调其质地和土壤水分特性。这些土壤的 OC 含量分为四个等级(1%、3%、5%、7%),并与相关变量一起在 BBN 中建模。农业技术转让决策支持系统(DSSAT)模拟了 48 个耕种季节的数据集,以确定 BBN 的参数。研究比较了耕作对小麦产量、地表径流和温室气体-二氧化碳排放的影响,并根据统计数据分布对模型参数进行了分类(从低到高)。结果显示,在最高参数类别中,NT 的表现优于 CT,比较概率估计值,温室气体-CO2 排放量从 "7.34% 降至 7.31%",累积径流从 "8.52% 降至 8.50%",而产量从 "7.46% 增至 7.56%"。相反,CT 显示排放量从 "7.34% 增加到 7.36%",累积径流从 "8.52% 增加到 8.55%",产量从 "7.46% 减少到 7.35%"。BBN 模型有效地捕捉了不确定性,提供了反映变量间条件关系的后验概率分布,并提供了有利于冬小麦土壤碳储量(在 "NT.OC-7%PDPG8 "土壤中最高,如 286,634 千克/公顷)而非 CT(在 "CT.OC-3.9%PDPG8 "土壤中最低,如 5,894 千克/公顷)的新界决策选择。平均而言,新界的温室气体二氧化碳排放量最低,为 "3,985 千克二氧化碳当量/公顷",而 CT 的排放量为 "7,415 千克二氧化碳当量/公顷"。相反,NT 的最大排放量为 "8,747 千克 CO2eqv/公顷",而 CT 的排放量为 "15,356 千克 CO2eqv/公顷"。与 CT 相比,NT 在所有土壤中的地表径流量都较低,并限制了径流的自然生成,从而缓解了洪水,并有可能进行定制改进。研究建议使用该模型对各种时空条件进行广泛评估。研究结果符合可持续发展目标,如联合国农业和粮食组织分别为负责任的生产和气候行动制定的 SDG12 和 SDG13。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advancing smart city factories: enhancing industrial mechanical operations via deep learning techniques. Inpainting of damaged temple murals using edge- and line-guided diffusion patch GAN. Catalyzing IVF outcome prediction: exploring advanced machine learning paradigms for enhanced success rate prognostication. Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor. A generative AI-driven interactive listening assessment task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1