Design and Psychometric Evaluation of Nurses' Mobile Health Device Acceptance Scale (NMHDA-Scale): Application of the Expectation-Confirmation Theory.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.2196/55324
Narjes Mirabootalebi, Zahra Meidani, Hossein Akbari, Fatemeh Rangraz Jeddi, Zahra Tagharrobi, Walter Swoboda, Felix Holl
{"title":"Design and Psychometric Evaluation of Nurses' Mobile Health Device Acceptance Scale (NMHDA-Scale): Application of the Expectation-Confirmation Theory.","authors":"Narjes Mirabootalebi, Zahra Meidani, Hossein Akbari, Fatemeh Rangraz Jeddi, Zahra Tagharrobi, Walter Swoboda, Felix Holl","doi":"10.2196/55324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of mobile tools in nursing care is indispensable. Given the importance of nurses' acceptance of these tools in delivering effective care, this issue requires greater attention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to design the Mobile Health Tool Acceptance Scale for Nurses based on the Expectation-Confirmation Theory and to evaluate it psychometrically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a Waltz-based approach grounded in existing tools and the constructs of the Expectation-Confirmation Theory, the initial version of the scale was designed and evaluated for face and content validity. Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis, concurrent validity, and known-group comparison. Reliability was assessed using measures of internal consistency and stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial version of the scale consisted of 33 items. During the qualitative and quantitative content validity stage, 1 item was added and 1 item was removed. Exploratory factor analysis, retaining 33 items, identified 5 factors that explained 70.53% of the variance. A significant positive correlation was found between the scores of the designed tool and nurses' attitudes toward using mobile-based apps in nursing care (r=0.655, P<.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach α, and ω coefficient were 0.938, 0.953, and 0.907, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 33-item scale developed is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring nurses' acceptance of mobile health tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of mobile tools in nursing care is indispensable. Given the importance of nurses' acceptance of these tools in delivering effective care, this issue requires greater attention.

Objective: This study aims to design the Mobile Health Tool Acceptance Scale for Nurses based on the Expectation-Confirmation Theory and to evaluate it psychometrically.

Methods: Using a Waltz-based approach grounded in existing tools and the constructs of the Expectation-Confirmation Theory, the initial version of the scale was designed and evaluated for face and content validity. Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis, concurrent validity, and known-group comparison. Reliability was assessed using measures of internal consistency and stability.

Results: The initial version of the scale consisted of 33 items. During the qualitative and quantitative content validity stage, 1 item was added and 1 item was removed. Exploratory factor analysis, retaining 33 items, identified 5 factors that explained 70.53% of the variance. A significant positive correlation was found between the scores of the designed tool and nurses' attitudes toward using mobile-based apps in nursing care (r=0.655, P<.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach α, and ω coefficient were 0.938, 0.953, and 0.907, respectively.

Conclusions: The 33-item scale developed is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring nurses' acceptance of mobile health tools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士移动医疗设备接受量表(NMHDA-Scale)的设计与心理测量学评估:期望-确认理论的应用。
背景介绍在护理工作中使用移动工具是不可或缺的。鉴于护士接受这些工具对提供有效护理的重要性,这一问题需要得到更多关注:本研究旨在根据期望-确认理论设计护士移动医疗工具接受量表,并对其进行心理评估:方法:采用基于现有工具和期望-确认理论的华尔兹方法,设计了量表的初始版本,并对其表面效度和内容效度进行了评估。通过探索性因素分析、并行有效性和已知组比较对结构有效性进行了检验。采用内部一致性和稳定性测量方法对信度进行了评估:量表的初始版本包括 33 个项目。在定性和定量内容效度阶段,增加了 1 个项目,删除了 1 个项目。在保留 33 个项目的基础上,进行了探索性因子分析,确定了 5 个因子,解释了 70.53% 的方差。设计工具的得分与护士对在护理工作中使用移动应用程序的态度之间存在明显的正相关(r=0.655,PConclusions:所开发的 33 项量表是衡量护士对移动医疗工具接受程度的有效而可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Shaping Adoption and Sustained Use Across the Maternal Journey: Qualitative Study on Perceived Usability and Credibility in Digital Health Tools. Inefficient Processes and Associated Factors in Primary Care Nursing: System Configuration Analysis. Italian Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (Ita-MAUQ): Translation and Validation Study in People With Multiple Sclerosis. A chat-bot based version of the WHO-validated intervention Self-Help+ for stress management: Co-Design and Usability Testing. User Requirements for an Electronic Patient Recruitment System: Semistructured Interview Analysis After First Implementation in 3 German University Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1