Outcomes for older people with screening detected versus existing chronic kidney disease: Cohort study with data linkage.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0123
Anna K Forbes, José M Ordóñez-Mena, Winnie Mei, Clare J Taylor, Nicholas Jones, Jennifer A Hirst, Fd Richard Hobbs
{"title":"Outcomes for older people with screening detected versus existing chronic kidney disease: Cohort study with data linkage.","authors":"Anna K Forbes, José M Ordóñez-Mena, Winnie Mei, Clare J Taylor, Nicholas Jones, Jennifer A Hirst, Fd Richard Hobbs","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a common health problem, associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), end stage kidney disease (ESKD), and premature death. A third of people aged≥70 years have CKD, many of whom are undiagnosed, but little is known about the value of screening.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the risk of adverse health outcomes between people with an existing diagnosis of CKD and those identified on screening. To identify factors associated with mortality in CKD.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Prospective cohort study of 892 primary care patients aged≥60 years with CKD (existing and screening detected) in Oxfordshire, with data linkage to civil death registry and secondary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional-hazard models to compare the risk of all-cause mortality, hospitalisation, CVD, ESKD separately, and as a composite between CKD groups, as well as to identify factors associated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 3-5 years, 49 people died, 493 were hospitalised, 57 had an incident CVD event, and 0 had an ESKD event. There was no difference in the composite outcome between those existing CKD and those identified on screening (HR 0.94, CI 0.67-1.33). Older age (HR 1.10, CI 1.06-1.15), male sex (HR 2.31, CI 1.26-4.24), and heart failure (HR 5.18, CI 2.45-10.97) were associated with increased risk of death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening older people for CKD may be of value, as their risk of short-term mortality, hospitalisation, and CVD is comparable to people routinely diagnosed. Larger studies with longer follow-up in more diverse and representative populations of older adults are needed to corroborate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a common health problem, associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), end stage kidney disease (ESKD), and premature death. A third of people aged≥70 years have CKD, many of whom are undiagnosed, but little is known about the value of screening.

Aim: To compare the risk of adverse health outcomes between people with an existing diagnosis of CKD and those identified on screening. To identify factors associated with mortality in CKD.

Design & setting: Prospective cohort study of 892 primary care patients aged≥60 years with CKD (existing and screening detected) in Oxfordshire, with data linkage to civil death registry and secondary care.

Method: Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional-hazard models to compare the risk of all-cause mortality, hospitalisation, CVD, ESKD separately, and as a composite between CKD groups, as well as to identify factors associated with mortality.

Results: After a median follow-up of 3-5 years, 49 people died, 493 were hospitalised, 57 had an incident CVD event, and 0 had an ESKD event. There was no difference in the composite outcome between those existing CKD and those identified on screening (HR 0.94, CI 0.67-1.33). Older age (HR 1.10, CI 1.06-1.15), male sex (HR 2.31, CI 1.26-4.24), and heart failure (HR 5.18, CI 2.45-10.97) were associated with increased risk of death.

Conclusion: Screening older people for CKD may be of value, as their risk of short-term mortality, hospitalisation, and CVD is comparable to people routinely diagnosed. Larger studies with longer follow-up in more diverse and representative populations of older adults are needed to corroborate these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛查出患有慢性肾脏病的老年人与患有慢性肾脏病的老年人的治疗效果:带有数据链接的队列研究。
背景:慢性肾病(CKD)是一种常见的健康问题,与心血管疾病(CVD)、终末期肾病(ESKD)和过早死亡的风险增加有关。目的:比较已确诊为慢性肾脏病和筛查发现的慢性肾脏病患者发生不良健康后果的风险。确定与慢性肾脏病死亡率相关的因素:前瞻性队列研究:对牛津郡 892 名年龄≥60 岁的 CKD 初级保健患者(现有患者和筛查发现的患者)进行前瞻性队列研究,并将数据与民事死亡登记和二级保健联系起来:采用 Cox 比例危险模型估算危险比 (HR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI),分别比较全因死亡、住院、心血管疾病、ESKD 的风险,以及 CKD 组别之间的综合风险,并确定与死亡率相关的因素:中位随访 3-5 年后,49 人死亡,493 人住院,57 人发生心血管疾病事件,0 人发生 ESKD 事件。已有慢性肾脏病和筛查发现的慢性肾脏病患者的综合结果没有差异(HR 0.94,CI 0.67-1.33)。高龄(HR 1.10,CI 1.06-1.15)、男性(HR 2.31,CI 1.26-4.24)和心力衰竭(HR 5.18,CI 2.45-10.97)与死亡风险增加有关:结论:对老年人进行慢性肾脏病筛查可能很有价值,因为他们的短期死亡、住院和心血管疾病风险与常规诊断的人群相当。要证实这些发现,还需要在更多样化、更具代表性的老年人群中进行更大规模、更长时间的随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1