Supporting Stewardship: Funding, Utilization, and Sustainability as Ethical Concerns in Networked Biobanking.

Q1 Arts and Humanities AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2024.2399533
R Jean Cadigan, Roselle Ponsaran, Carla Rich, Josie Timmons, Kyle B Brothers, Aaron J Goldenberg
{"title":"Supporting Stewardship: Funding, Utilization, and Sustainability as Ethical Concerns in Networked Biobanking.","authors":"R Jean Cadigan, Roselle Ponsaran, Carla Rich, Josie Timmons, Kyle B Brothers, Aaron J Goldenberg","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2024.2399533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The literature on the ethics of biobanking often overlooks the practical operations of biobanks. The ethics of stewardship requires that biobank resources are used to conduct beneficial science. Networked biobanks have emerged to increase the scientific benefit of biobank resources, but little is known about whether and how operations of networking may accomplish this goal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a larger study on the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of networked biobanking, we conducted 38 interviews with representatives of 31 networked biobanks. Interviews explored operations of the networks. We used thematic analysis to examine how respondents describe three topics associated with stewarding biobank resources-funding, utilization, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results highlight that funding, utilization, and sustainability are critical not only to the operation of biobanks, but also to the ethical obligations that biobankers owe to stakeholders to steward the resources. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that respondents would describe networking as beneficial to increasing funding, utilization, and sustainability of the network. Respondents generally found value in networked biobanking, but networking did not necessarily increase funding, utilization, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results presented here support inclusion of funding, utilization, and sustainability as topics of ethical concern in the practice of biobanking and networked biobanking. These issues are rooted in the stewardship obligations that biobankers feel to their partners, client investigators, and participants. The goal of promoting stewardship through networking requires significant time and effort to build governance models that honor the obligations of each individual biobank to their donors and advance the collective goals of the network. We conclude with suggestions offered by respondents to address improving these aspects of stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2024.2399533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The literature on the ethics of biobanking often overlooks the practical operations of biobanks. The ethics of stewardship requires that biobank resources are used to conduct beneficial science. Networked biobanks have emerged to increase the scientific benefit of biobank resources, but little is known about whether and how operations of networking may accomplish this goal.

Methods: As part of a larger study on the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of networked biobanking, we conducted 38 interviews with representatives of 31 networked biobanks. Interviews explored operations of the networks. We used thematic analysis to examine how respondents describe three topics associated with stewarding biobank resources-funding, utilization, and sustainability.

Results: Our results highlight that funding, utilization, and sustainability are critical not only to the operation of biobanks, but also to the ethical obligations that biobankers owe to stakeholders to steward the resources. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that respondents would describe networking as beneficial to increasing funding, utilization, and sustainability of the network. Respondents generally found value in networked biobanking, but networking did not necessarily increase funding, utilization, and sustainability.

Conclusion: The results presented here support inclusion of funding, utilization, and sustainability as topics of ethical concern in the practice of biobanking and networked biobanking. These issues are rooted in the stewardship obligations that biobankers feel to their partners, client investigators, and participants. The goal of promoting stewardship through networking requires significant time and effort to build governance models that honor the obligations of each individual biobank to their donors and advance the collective goals of the network. We conclude with suggestions offered by respondents to address improving these aspects of stewardship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持管理:资助、利用和可持续性是网络生物库的伦理问题。
背景:有关生物库伦理的文献往往忽视了生物库的实际运作。管理伦理要求将生物库资源用于开展有益的科学研究。网络化生物库的出现是为了提高生物库资源的科学效益,但人们对网络化运作是否以及如何实现这一目标知之甚少:作为网络化生物库的伦理、法律和社会影响 (ELSI) 大型研究的一部分,我们对 31 家网络化生物库的代表进行了 38 次访谈。访谈探讨了网络的运作。我们使用主题分析法研究了受访者如何描述与管理生物银行资源相关的三个主题--资金、利用和可持续性:结果:我们的研究结果强调,资金、利用和可持续性不仅对生物库的运营至关重要,而且对生物库管理者对利益相关者承担的管理资源的道德义务也至关重要。根据之前的研究,我们假设受访者会认为联网有利于增加资金、利用率和网络的可持续性。受访者普遍认为生物银行网络化具有价值,但网络化并不一定会增加资金、利用率和可持续性:本文的研究结果支持将资金、利用率和可持续性作为生物银行和网络化生物银行实践中的伦理问题。这些问题的根源在于生物库管理者对其合作伙伴、客户研究者和参与者的管理义务。要实现通过网络促进管理的目标,需要花费大量的时间和精力来建立管理模式,以履行每个生物库对捐献者的义务,并推进网络的集体目标。最后,我们将根据受访者提出的建议来改进这些方面的管理工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Animals is "Still Genetics": Perspectives of Genome Scientists and Policymakers on Animal and Human Enhancement. Associations Between the Legalization and Implementation of Medical Aid in Dying and Suicide Rates in the United States. Ethics Consultation in U.S. Pediatric Hospitals: Adherence to National Practice Standards. Monitored and Cared for at Home? Privacy Concerns When Using Smart Home Health Technologies to Care for Older Persons. Advance Medical Decision-Making Differs Across First- and Third-Person Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1