Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese.

IF 2.5 Q2 NURSING SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241278611
Ivo Cristiano Soares Paiva, Teresa Margarida Almeida Neves, Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos Ventura, António Carlos Lopes Vilela, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges Moreira
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese.","authors":"Ivo Cristiano Soares Paiva, Teresa Margarida Almeida Neves, Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos Ventura, António Carlos Lopes Vilela, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges Moreira","doi":"10.1177/23779608241278611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses are continually faced with multiple demands to make decisions in their clinical practice. The Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI) assesses nurses' decision-making styles during the several stages of this process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To adapt the NDMI into European Portuguese and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version in a population of Portuguese nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive study design was used to examine psychometric properties of NDMI. Nonprobability convenience sample of 339 Portuguese direct-care nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising sociodemographic and professional data and the NDMI-Portuguese version (NDMI-PT). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA; <i>n </i>= 125) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; <i>n </i>= 214) were carried out using IBM SPSS (v. 24) and AMOS (v. 22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA revealed a structure of four latent factors, which represent the reorganized stages of the decision-making process. The CFA found a good overall fit of the model (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.13; comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.91; goodness of fit index [GFI] = 0.82; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.90; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07; maximum-likelihood expected cross-validation index [MECVI] = 3.13). The psychometric analysis of the theoretical structure revealed that the four factors reflect the decision-making stages and have a better overall fit than the empirical structure (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.82; CFI = 0.94; GFI = 0.86; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.06; MECVI = 2.55). The analysis of the construct reliability of the NDMI-PT revealed that the overall internal consistency was excellent (<i>α</i>=0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the empirical and theoretical structures were appropriate and valid for the sample under analysis. The NDMI-PT is a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses' decision-making styles. Studies should be conducted to gain further insight into the robustness of this validated tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"10 ","pages":"23779608241278611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241278611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nurses are continually faced with multiple demands to make decisions in their clinical practice. The Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI) assesses nurses' decision-making styles during the several stages of this process.

Objectives: To adapt the NDMI into European Portuguese and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version in a population of Portuguese nurses.

Methods: Descriptive study design was used to examine psychometric properties of NDMI. Nonprobability convenience sample of 339 Portuguese direct-care nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising sociodemographic and professional data and the NDMI-Portuguese version (NDMI-PT). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 125) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 214) were carried out using IBM SPSS (v. 24) and AMOS (v. 22).

Results: The EFA revealed a structure of four latent factors, which represent the reorganized stages of the decision-making process. The CFA found a good overall fit of the model (χ2/df = 2.13; comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.91; goodness of fit index [GFI] = 0.82; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.90; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07; maximum-likelihood expected cross-validation index [MECVI] = 3.13). The psychometric analysis of the theoretical structure revealed that the four factors reflect the decision-making stages and have a better overall fit than the empirical structure (χ2/df = 1.82; CFI = 0.94; GFI = 0.86; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.06; MECVI = 2.55). The analysis of the construct reliability of the NDMI-PT revealed that the overall internal consistency was excellent (α=0.96).

Conclusions: This study revealed that the empirical and theoretical structures were appropriate and valid for the sample under analysis. The NDMI-PT is a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses' decision-making styles. Studies should be conducted to gain further insight into the robustness of this validated tool.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将护理决策工具的文化适应性和心理测量学评估纳入欧洲葡萄牙语。
导言:护士在临床实践中不断面临多种决策要求。护理决策工具(NDMI)可评估护士在这一过程的多个阶段的决策风格:将 NDMI 调整为欧洲葡萄牙语,并在葡萄牙护士群体中评估葡萄牙语版本的心理测量特性:方法:采用描述性研究设计来检验 NDMI 的心理测量特性。对 339 名葡萄牙直接护理护士进行了非概率抽样调查。通过一份包含社会人口学和专业数据的问卷以及 NDMI 葡萄牙语版本(NDMI-PT)收集数据。使用 IBM SPSS (v. 24) 和 AMOS (v. 22) 进行了探索性因子分析(EFA;n = 125)和确证性因子分析(CFA;n = 214):EFA 揭示了由四个潜在因子组成的结构,它们代表了决策过程的重组阶段。CFA发现模型总体拟合良好(χ2/df = 2.13;比较拟合指数[CFI] = 0.91;拟合优度指数[GFI] = 0.82;塔克-刘易斯指数[TLI] = 0.90;近似均方根误差[RMSEA] = 0.07;最大似然期望交叉验证指数[MECVI] = 3.13)。对理论结构的心理测量分析表明,四个因子反映了决策阶段,其整体拟合优于经验结构(χ2/df = 1.82;CFI = 0.94;GFI = 0.86;TLI = 0.93;RMSEA = 0.06;MECVI = 2.55)。对 NDMI-PT 构建信度的分析表明,其总体内部一致性非常好(α=0.96):本研究表明,对于所分析的样本而言,经验和理论结构是适当和有效的。NDMI-PT是评估护士决策风格的可靠有效的工具。应继续开展研究,以进一步了解这一有效工具的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post-CABG Care at Home: A Qualitative Study of Family Caregiver Challenges in a Resource Limited Context. Empowering Nurses for Climate Resilience: Opportunities and Challenges in Philippine Nursing Education. Management and Nursing Care of a Pseudoaneurysm Caused by Inadvertent Arterial Puncture: A Case Report. Understanding Migration Intentions of Albanian Physicians and Nurses. Current State of PhD Nursing Education in Four Countries: A Comparative Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1