Artificial Intelligence (AI) Assessment of Pediatric Dental Panoramic Radiographs (DPRs): A Clinical Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Reports Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.3390/pediatric16030067
Natalia Turosz, Kamila Chęcińska, Maciej Chęciński, Karolina Lubecka, Filip Bliźniak, Maciej Sikora
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) Assessment of Pediatric Dental Panoramic Radiographs (DPRs): A Clinical Study.","authors":"Natalia Turosz, Kamila Chęcińska, Maciej Chęciński, Karolina Lubecka, Filip Bliźniak, Maciej Sikora","doi":"10.3390/pediatric16030067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This clinical study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision of artificial intelligence (AI) in assessing permanent teeth in pediatric patients. Over one thousand consecutive DPRs taken in Kielce, Poland, with the Carestream CS9600 device were screened. In the study material, 35 dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) of patients of developmental age were identified and included. They were automatically evaluated with an AI algorithm. The DPRs were then analyzed by researchers. The status of the following dichotomous variables was assessed: (1) decay, (2) missing tooth, (3) filled tooth, (4) root canal filling, and (5) endodontic lesion. The results showed high specificity and accuracy (all above 85%) in detecting caries, dental fillings, and missing teeth but low precision. This study provided a detailed assessment of AI performance in a previously neglected age group. In conclusion, the overall accuracy of AI algorithms for evaluating permanent dentition in dental panoramic radiographs is lower for pediatric patients than adults or the entire population. Hence, identifying primary teeth should be implemented in AI-driven software, at least so as to ignore them when assessing mixed dentition (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT06258798).</p>","PeriodicalId":45251,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric16030067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This clinical study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision of artificial intelligence (AI) in assessing permanent teeth in pediatric patients. Over one thousand consecutive DPRs taken in Kielce, Poland, with the Carestream CS9600 device were screened. In the study material, 35 dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) of patients of developmental age were identified and included. They were automatically evaluated with an AI algorithm. The DPRs were then analyzed by researchers. The status of the following dichotomous variables was assessed: (1) decay, (2) missing tooth, (3) filled tooth, (4) root canal filling, and (5) endodontic lesion. The results showed high specificity and accuracy (all above 85%) in detecting caries, dental fillings, and missing teeth but low precision. This study provided a detailed assessment of AI performance in a previously neglected age group. In conclusion, the overall accuracy of AI algorithms for evaluating permanent dentition in dental panoramic radiographs is lower for pediatric patients than adults or the entire population. Hence, identifying primary teeth should be implemented in AI-driven software, at least so as to ignore them when assessing mixed dentition (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT06258798).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能(AI)评估儿童牙科全景X光片(DPR):临床研究。
这项临床研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)在评估儿童患者恒牙时的灵敏度、特异性、准确性和精确性。研究人员在波兰凯尔采使用 Carestream CS9600 设备连续拍摄了一千多张 DPR 照片。在研究材料中,确定并纳入了 35 张发育年龄患者的牙科全景照片 (DPR)。这些照片通过人工智能算法进行了自动评估。随后,研究人员对 DPR 进行了分析。对以下二分变量的状态进行了评估:(1) 龋齿;(2) 缺牙;(3) 充填牙;(4) 根管充填;(5) 根管病变。结果显示,在检测龋齿、补牙和缺失牙方面,特异性和准确性都很高(均高于 85%),但精确度较低。这项研究详细评估了人工智能在以往被忽视的年龄组中的表现。总之,人工智能算法评估牙科全景X光片中恒牙的总体准确性在儿科患者中低于成人或整个人群。因此,人工智能驱动的软件应该识别基牙,至少在评估混合牙列时忽略基牙(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT06258798)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Reports
Pediatric Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parents' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Pediatric Ophthalmic Disorders in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Pregnancy: An Obstetrics View. Growth Parameters and Prevalence of Obesity in PKU Patients and Peers: Is This the Right Comparison? Trends in Marijuana Use among Adolescents in the United States. Beyond Reading: Psychological and Mental Health Needs in Adolescents with Dyslexia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1