Perceived Barriers of Clinical Roles Towards Intensive Care Unit Mobility.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5551184
Hassan Y Aljohani, Shahad Alammar, Shoug Alnawmasi, Riham Alfawzan, Nouf Alotaibi, Noora Mumenah, Arwa Alruwaili, Saleh S Algrani, Tareq F Alotaibi, Mobarak K Alqahtani, Mohammed M Alqahtani, Abdullah M Alanazi, Taha Ismaeil, Sarah Almalki, Jassas Alotaibi
{"title":"Perceived Barriers of Clinical Roles Towards Intensive Care Unit Mobility.","authors":"Hassan Y Aljohani, Shahad Alammar, Shoug Alnawmasi, Riham Alfawzan, Nouf Alotaibi, Noora Mumenah, Arwa Alruwaili, Saleh S Algrani, Tareq F Alotaibi, Mobarak K Alqahtani, Mohammed M Alqahtani, Abdullah M Alanazi, Taha Ismaeil, Sarah Almalki, Jassas Alotaibi","doi":"10.1155/2024/5551184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is overwhelming evidence of improved patient outcomes as a result of early mobilization in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, several barriers of ICU mobility remain understated with reference to clinical roles. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perceived barriers of early mobility of critically ill patients among ICU healthcare providers. <b>Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional study, the Mobilization Attitudes and Beliefs Survey (PMABS-ICU) was administered to ICU healthcare providers using an online survey. The study investigated barriers related to knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding ICU mobility practices. These barriers were compared among different ICU clinical roles. <b>Results:</b> The survey yielded a total number of 214 healthcare providers with 41% female and 59% male. Respiratory therapists reported the highest perceived barriers to ICU mobility (M 39, IQR 36, 43) % compared to physical therapists (who reported the lowest barriers), occupational therapists, nurses, and physicians (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). ICU healthcare providers' behavior towards ICU mobility such as perceived benefits and safety is ranked as the primary barrier (M 49, IQR 42, 52) %. Professional experience did not significantly vary among all groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings highlight that ICU healthcare providers' perceptions, including both potential benefits and safety concerns regarding mobility, are significant barriers to implement mobility practices. ICU mobility barriers should be tackled by providing education and training. A focused effort to include RTs and nurses could advance interdisciplinary ICU mobility practice and reduce associated barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5551184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5551184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is overwhelming evidence of improved patient outcomes as a result of early mobilization in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, several barriers of ICU mobility remain understated with reference to clinical roles. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perceived barriers of early mobility of critically ill patients among ICU healthcare providers. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the Mobilization Attitudes and Beliefs Survey (PMABS-ICU) was administered to ICU healthcare providers using an online survey. The study investigated barriers related to knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding ICU mobility practices. These barriers were compared among different ICU clinical roles. Results: The survey yielded a total number of 214 healthcare providers with 41% female and 59% male. Respiratory therapists reported the highest perceived barriers to ICU mobility (M 39, IQR 36, 43) % compared to physical therapists (who reported the lowest barriers), occupational therapists, nurses, and physicians (p ≤ 0.05). ICU healthcare providers' behavior towards ICU mobility such as perceived benefits and safety is ranked as the primary barrier (M 49, IQR 42, 52) %. Professional experience did not significantly vary among all groups. Conclusion: Our findings highlight that ICU healthcare providers' perceptions, including both potential benefits and safety concerns regarding mobility, are significant barriers to implement mobility practices. ICU mobility barriers should be tackled by providing education and training. A focused effort to include RTs and nurses could advance interdisciplinary ICU mobility practice and reduce associated barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床角色对重症监护室流动性的认知障碍。
背景:有大量证据表明,在重症监护病房(ICU)进行早期移动可改善患者的预后。然而,在临床角色方面,重症监护室移动的几个障碍仍被低估。本研究旨在调查重症监护室医护人员对危重病人早期移动障碍的认知。研究方法在这项横断面研究中,采用在线调查的方式对 ICU 医护人员进行了移动态度和信念调查(PMABS-ICU)。研究调查了与 ICU 移动实践相关的知识、态度和行为障碍。这些障碍在不同的 ICU 临床角色之间进行了比较。结果:共有 214 名医疗服务提供者参与了调查,其中女性占 41%,男性占 59%。与物理治疗师(报告的障碍最少)、职业治疗师、护士和医生相比,呼吸治疗师报告的ICU行动障碍感知率最高(M 39, IQR 36, 43)(p ≤ 0.05)。重症监护室医疗服务提供者对重症监护室移动的行为,如感知到的益处和安全性,被列为主要障碍(M 49, IQR 42, 52)%。各组之间的专业经验差异不大。结论我们的研究结果表明,ICU 医疗服务提供者对移动性潜在益处和安全性的认知是实施移动性实践的重要障碍。ICU 移动障碍应通过提供教育和培训来解决。将康复治疗师和护士纳入其中的重点工作可以促进跨学科的 ICU 移动能力实践并减少相关障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Physical Health and Socioeconomic Status in Ambulatory Adults With Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Comparing the Physiological Responses to the 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test. Virtual Reality Technology for Physical and Cognitive Function Rehabilitation in People With Multiple Sclerosis. Categories of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale Activities in Chronic Neck Pain and Their Relationship to the Neck Disability Index. The NewGait Rehabilitative Device Corrects Gait Deviations in Individuals With Foot Drop.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1