IMRA/SRS Delphi consensus on international standards for common core components of robotic surgical training design.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02057-8
Jessica Wynn, Anthony Costello, Kirsten Larkins, Daniel Costello, Ahmed Ghazi, Kieran Ryan, Kevin Barry, Matthew Gray, Anthony Gallagher, Andrew Hung, Alexander Heriot, Satish Warrier, Farleigh Reeves, Justin Collins, Phil Dundee, Justin Peters, David Homewood, Dean Driscoll, Owen Niall, Tayla Fay, Ajit Sachdeva, Henry Woo, Richard Satava, Helen Mohan
{"title":"IMRA/SRS Delphi consensus on international standards for common core components of robotic surgical training design.","authors":"Jessica Wynn, Anthony Costello, Kirsten Larkins, Daniel Costello, Ahmed Ghazi, Kieran Ryan, Kevin Barry, Matthew Gray, Anthony Gallagher, Andrew Hung, Alexander Heriot, Satish Warrier, Farleigh Reeves, Justin Collins, Phil Dundee, Justin Peters, David Homewood, Dean Driscoll, Owen Niall, Tayla Fay, Ajit Sachdeva, Henry Woo, Richard Satava, Helen Mohan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02057-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic surgery has expanded internationally at pace. There are multiple local robotic training pathways but there is inconsistency in standardisation of core common components for curricula internationally. A framework is required to define key objectives that can be implemented across robotic training ecosystems. This Delphi consensus aimed to provide recommendations for core considerations in robotic training design across diverse training environments internationally. A literature search was performed and an international steering committee (AG, KL, JW, HM, TC) proposed key components for contemporary robotic training design and a modified Delphi approach was used to gather stakeholder opinion. The outcomes were then discussed at a face-to-face international expert consensus at the IMRA educational session at the Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS) meeting and final voting was conducted on outstanding items. Stakeholders included robotic surgeons, proctors, trainees and robotic surgical training providers. There was consensus achieved in 139 statements organised into 15 themes. There was 100% agreement that standardised themes in robotic curricula may improve patient safety. Key take-home messages include-training curricula should be multiplatform, non-technical skills are an important component of a robotic curriculum as well as console and bedside skills, clinically relevant performance metrics should be used for assessment where available, the reliance on cadaveric and live animal models should be reduced as high-fidelity synthetic models emerge, and stepwise component training is useful for advanced procedural training. These consensus recommendations are intended to guide design of fit for purpose contemporary robotic surgical curricula. Integration of these components into robotic training pathways internationally is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02057-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic surgery has expanded internationally at pace. There are multiple local robotic training pathways but there is inconsistency in standardisation of core common components for curricula internationally. A framework is required to define key objectives that can be implemented across robotic training ecosystems. This Delphi consensus aimed to provide recommendations for core considerations in robotic training design across diverse training environments internationally. A literature search was performed and an international steering committee (AG, KL, JW, HM, TC) proposed key components for contemporary robotic training design and a modified Delphi approach was used to gather stakeholder opinion. The outcomes were then discussed at a face-to-face international expert consensus at the IMRA educational session at the Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS) meeting and final voting was conducted on outstanding items. Stakeholders included robotic surgeons, proctors, trainees and robotic surgical training providers. There was consensus achieved in 139 statements organised into 15 themes. There was 100% agreement that standardised themes in robotic curricula may improve patient safety. Key take-home messages include-training curricula should be multiplatform, non-technical skills are an important component of a robotic curriculum as well as console and bedside skills, clinically relevant performance metrics should be used for assessment where available, the reliance on cadaveric and live animal models should be reduced as high-fidelity synthetic models emerge, and stepwise component training is useful for advanced procedural training. These consensus recommendations are intended to guide design of fit for purpose contemporary robotic surgical curricula. Integration of these components into robotic training pathways internationally is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IMRA/SRS 就机器人手术培训设计共同核心内容的国际标准达成德尔菲共识。
机器人手术在国际上迅速发展。当地有多种机器人培训途径,但国际课程的核心共同组成部分的标准化并不一致。我们需要一个框架来定义可在机器人培训生态系统中实施的关键目标。本德尔菲共识旨在为国际上不同培训环境中机器人培训设计的核心考虑因素提供建议。我们进行了文献检索,并由一个国际指导委员会(AG、KL、JW、HM、TC)提出了当代机器人训练设计的关键要素,并采用改良德尔菲法收集利益相关者的意见。随后,在机器人外科学会 (SRS) 会议的 IMRA 教育会议上,国际专家面对面讨论了讨论结果,并对未决项目进行了最终投票。利益相关者包括机器人外科医生、监查员、学员和机器人手术培训机构。会议就 15 个主题下的 139 项声明达成了共识。100%的与会者一致认为,机器人课程中的标准化主题可提高患者安全。获得的主要信息包括:培训课程应该是多平台的;非技术性技能是机器人课程的重要组成部分,控制台和床边技能也是如此;在有条件的情况下,应该使用与临床相关的性能指标进行评估;随着高保真合成模型的出现,应该减少对尸体和活体动物模型的依赖;分步式组件培训对高级程序培训很有用。这些共识建议旨在指导当代机器人手术课程的设计。建议国际社会将这些内容纳入机器人培训途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
A review of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in perioperative radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Patient reported health related quality of life outcomes after viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue placement directly over spared neurovascular bundles after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Comparative perioperative outcomes of intravenous indocyanine green during robot-assisted cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and bothersome LUTS-a retrospective cohort study. Correction: Body mass index influence on short-term perioperative results in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1