Preoperative quality of life of patients with cleft lip and palate in Nigeria: a multicentre cross-sectional pilot study.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2024.48.50.42111
Afieharo Igbibia Michael, Adeola Adenike Olusanya, Chinedu Michael Okoli, Bardi Martins, Akintunde Joseph Akintayo, Ijeoma Onwuagha
{"title":"Preoperative quality of life of patients with cleft lip and palate in Nigeria: a multicentre cross-sectional pilot study.","authors":"Afieharo Igbibia Michael, Adeola Adenike Olusanya, Chinedu Michael Okoli, Bardi Martins, Akintunde Joseph Akintayo, Ijeoma Onwuagha","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2024.48.50.42111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>the objective of this study was to determine the quality of life (QoL) of the patient with a cleft lip or palate scheduled for surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>this analytic multicenter cross-sectional study involved six participating Smile Train Partner Hospitals from five geopolitical zones of the country and three major ethnic groups. Patients with cleft lip or cleft palate aged between 8 to 29 years scheduled for repair were recruited. The main outcome measure was quality of life scores as measured by cleft Q.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>thirty-four (females 18, males 16) patients were scheduled for surgery of either cleft lip n=7 (20.6%) or cleft palate n=27 (79.4). Patients scheduled for primary surgeries were more than those for secondary surgeries, 23 (68.7%) vs 10 (30.3%). Of the QoL scales, the speech distress score was the least (56.0 ± 22.6) and the psychological score highest (73.9 ± 15.8). All QoL mean scores except the psychological score fell below normative cleft Q scores. The psychological scores in males (80.9 ± 16.2) were significantly higher than in females (67.7 ± 12.9, p=0.01). Patients for lip repair had lower psychological scores than those for palatal repair (median=59 vs 73, p=0.01). Patients for palate repair demonstrated significantly lower speech function and distress scores than those for lip repair (p=0.01, p<0.01 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>most of the QoL measures in patients with cleft lip and palate in this study fell below normative values. Gender and cleft type affect the quality of life. A larger study is recommended to establish national normative data.</p>","PeriodicalId":48190,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2024.48.50.42111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the objective of this study was to determine the quality of life (QoL) of the patient with a cleft lip or palate scheduled for surgery.

Methods: this analytic multicenter cross-sectional study involved six participating Smile Train Partner Hospitals from five geopolitical zones of the country and three major ethnic groups. Patients with cleft lip or cleft palate aged between 8 to 29 years scheduled for repair were recruited. The main outcome measure was quality of life scores as measured by cleft Q.

Results: thirty-four (females 18, males 16) patients were scheduled for surgery of either cleft lip n=7 (20.6%) or cleft palate n=27 (79.4). Patients scheduled for primary surgeries were more than those for secondary surgeries, 23 (68.7%) vs 10 (30.3%). Of the QoL scales, the speech distress score was the least (56.0 ± 22.6) and the psychological score highest (73.9 ± 15.8). All QoL mean scores except the psychological score fell below normative cleft Q scores. The psychological scores in males (80.9 ± 16.2) were significantly higher than in females (67.7 ± 12.9, p=0.01). Patients for lip repair had lower psychological scores than those for palatal repair (median=59 vs 73, p=0.01). Patients for palate repair demonstrated significantly lower speech function and distress scores than those for lip repair (p=0.01, p<0.01 respectively).

Conclusion: most of the QoL measures in patients with cleft lip and palate in this study fell below normative values. Gender and cleft type affect the quality of life. A larger study is recommended to establish national normative data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚唇腭裂患者术前的生活质量:一项多中心横断面试点研究。
导言:这项研究的目的是确定唇裂或腭裂患者的生活质量(QoL)。方法:这项多中心横断面分析研究涉及全国五个地缘政治区和三个主要民族的六家微笑列车合作医院。研究招募了 8 至 29 岁的唇裂或腭裂修复患者。结果:34 名患者(女性 18 名,男性 16 名)计划接受唇裂手术,其中唇裂患者 7 名(20.6%),腭裂患者 27 名(79.4%)。计划进行初次手术的患者多于二次手术的患者,分别为 23 人(68.7%)和 10 人(30.3%)。在 QoL 量表中,言语困扰得分最低(56.0 ± 22.6),心理得分最高(73.9 ± 15.8)。除心理分数外,所有 QoL 平均分数均低于正常 Q 裂缝分数。男性的心理得分(80.9 ± 16.2)明显高于女性(67.7 ± 12.9,P=0.01)。唇修复患者的心理评分低于腭修复患者(中位数=59 vs 73,P=0.01)。腭修复患者的言语功能和痛苦评分明显低于唇修复患者(P=0.01,P=0.01)。性别和唇裂类型会影响生活质量。建议进行更大规模的研究,以建立全国常模数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pan African Medical Journal
Pan African Medical Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
691
期刊最新文献
[Livedo reticularis following administration of COVID-19 vaccine: a case report]. A rare case of aggressive uterine leiomyosarcoma: a case report. Pure yolk sac tumor of the testis on histopathology: a clinical image. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus surface antigen, associated risk factors, and liver enzyme abnormalities among individuals with diabetes in Aksum town public hospitals, Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Thyroid dysfunction among patients assessed by thyroid function tests at a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1