Comparison of full-arch mandibular reconstruction with dental implants using completely splinted or segmentally splinted prostheses with two different occlusal schemes: A finite-element analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1111/jopr.13954
Sarah Abrishamkar, Amirhossein Fathi, Mahsa Ghorbani, Ramin Mosharraf
{"title":"Comparison of full-arch mandibular reconstruction with dental implants using completely splinted or segmentally splinted prostheses with two different occlusal schemes: A finite-element analysis.","authors":"Sarah Abrishamkar, Amirhossein Fathi, Mahsa Ghorbani, Ramin Mosharraf","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to comparatively analyze full-arch mandibular reconstruction using dental implants. It focused on two distinct prosthesis configurations: completely splinted and segmentally splinted. These configurations were evaluated under two different occlusal schemes-group function and canine guidance-utilizing finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The methodology involved developing three-dimensional finite element models from computed tomography data acquired from an edentulous patient. Six dental implants were utilized to complete the mandibular reconstruction. Prosthetic reconstruction was conducted with completely and segmentally splinted prostheses, each employing group function and canine guidance occlusal schemes. Consequently, four distinct models were analyzed. Following meshing, a 200 N load was applied at a 30-degree angle. Subsequent evaluation encompassed stress, strain distribution, and the overall deformation of the implants, crowns, and underlying bone structure assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group function occlusal scheme generally exhibited lower stress values than the canine guidance occlusal scheme, with three-piece prostheses demonstrating even lower stress levels than one-piece prostheses. Conversely, the canine guidance occlusal scheme exhibited higher stress values overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study may assist clinicians in selecting the most effective occlusal scheme and prosthetic configuration for implant-supported mandibular restorations, potentially enhancing treatment outcomes and reducing the risk of mechanical complications. In summary, results indicated that group function loading, irrespective of prosthesis type, offers more uniform load distribution and lower stress values, making it a preferable choice over canine guidance. Within the group function occlusal scheme, three-piece prostheses demonstrated lower stress values than one-piece prostheses, but the clinical significance of this difference appears to be minimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to comparatively analyze full-arch mandibular reconstruction using dental implants. It focused on two distinct prosthesis configurations: completely splinted and segmentally splinted. These configurations were evaluated under two different occlusal schemes-group function and canine guidance-utilizing finite element analysis (FEA).

Materials and methods: The methodology involved developing three-dimensional finite element models from computed tomography data acquired from an edentulous patient. Six dental implants were utilized to complete the mandibular reconstruction. Prosthetic reconstruction was conducted with completely and segmentally splinted prostheses, each employing group function and canine guidance occlusal schemes. Consequently, four distinct models were analyzed. Following meshing, a 200 N load was applied at a 30-degree angle. Subsequent evaluation encompassed stress, strain distribution, and the overall deformation of the implants, crowns, and underlying bone structure assessment.

Results: The group function occlusal scheme generally exhibited lower stress values than the canine guidance occlusal scheme, with three-piece prostheses demonstrating even lower stress levels than one-piece prostheses. Conversely, the canine guidance occlusal scheme exhibited higher stress values overall.

Conclusion: The findings of this study may assist clinicians in selecting the most effective occlusal scheme and prosthetic configuration for implant-supported mandibular restorations, potentially enhancing treatment outcomes and reducing the risk of mechanical complications. In summary, results indicated that group function loading, irrespective of prosthesis type, offers more uniform load distribution and lower stress values, making it a preferable choice over canine guidance. Within the group function occlusal scheme, three-piece prostheses demonstrated lower stress values than one-piece prostheses, but the clinical significance of this difference appears to be minimal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用两种不同咬合方案的完全夹板式或分段夹板式义齿进行下颌全拱重建的比较:有限元分析。
目的:本研究旨在比较分析使用牙科种植体进行全拱下颌重建的情况。研究重点是两种不同的修复体配置:完全夹板式和分段夹板式。利用有限元分析(FEA),在两种不同的咬合方案下对这些配置进行了评估--组功能和犬齿引导:研究方法包括根据从无牙颌患者身上获取的计算机断层扫描数据建立三维有限元模型。利用六颗种植体完成下颌重建。修复重建采用完全和分段夹板修复体,每种修复体都采用组功能和犬引导咬合方案。因此,对四个不同的模型进行了分析。啮合后,以 30 度角施加 200 N 的负荷。随后的评估包括应力、应变分布以及种植体、牙冠和底层骨结构的整体变形评估:结果:组功能咬合方案的应力值普遍低于犬引导咬合方案,三件式修复体的应力水平甚至低于一件式修复体。相反,犬引导咬合方案的应力值总体较高:本研究的结果可以帮助临床医生为种植体支持的下颌修复体选择最有效的咬合方案和修复体配置,从而提高治疗效果并降低机械并发症的风险。总之,研究结果表明,无论修复体类型如何,群功能加载都能提供更均匀的负荷分布和更低的应力值,因此与犬齿引导相比,群功能加载是更可取的选择。在组功能咬合方案中,三件式修复体的应力值低于一件式修复体,但这种差异的临床意义似乎微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
期刊最新文献
Effect of magnetic resonance imaging protocol on decision-making for positioning of dental implants in edentulous cases. Utilization of digitally milled verification jigs for recording jaw relations in complete-arch implant rehabilitation: A digital clinical report. Influence of the post-processing protocol on a biocompatible 3D-printed resin. Intraoral scanning for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses (ISCFDPs): Four clinical reports. Accuracy of intraoral versus desktop scanners used in digitizing polyvinyl siloxane impression for fabricating a CAD-CAM customized post and core.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1