Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding? Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
Victor Augusto Alves Bento, Pedro Antônio de Souza Rolim, José Roberto Vergínio de Matos, Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo Lemos, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Aimée Maria Guiotti
{"title":"Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding? Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.","authors":"Victor Augusto Alves Bento, Pedro Antônio de Souza Rolim, José Roberto Vergínio de Matos, Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo Lemos, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Aimée Maria Guiotti","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate, through in vitro studies, the bond strength of vitreous and hybrid ceramics with self-etching surface treatment compared to conventional treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered on the open science framework (OSF) platform for in vitro studies. A population, intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) question was formulated: \"Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding?\". A literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases until September 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal guidelines for quasi-experimental studies were used for risk assessment of bias. The meta-analysis was based on the inverse variance (IV) method (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 in vitro studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in this systematic review, totaling 1889 ceramic samples. The meta-analysis indicated a significant decrease in the bond strength of HF 4%-5% with silane compared to self-etching (p < 0.05; MD: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13-0.35; I<sup>2</sup> = 3%, p = 0.42), while it indicated that there was no significant difference between self-etching compared to 9%-10% HF with silane (p = 0.92; MD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.36; I<sup>2</sup> = 14%, p = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-etching primer presents bond strength that is superior to or similar to conventional surface treatment on glass and hybrid ceramics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate, through in vitro studies, the bond strength of vitreous and hybrid ceramics with self-etching surface treatment compared to conventional treatment.
Methods: This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered on the open science framework (OSF) platform for in vitro studies. A population, intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) question was formulated: "Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding?". A literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases until September 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal guidelines for quasi-experimental studies were used for risk assessment of bias. The meta-analysis was based on the inverse variance (IV) method (p < 0.05).
Results: A total of 29 in vitro studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in this systematic review, totaling 1889 ceramic samples. The meta-analysis indicated a significant decrease in the bond strength of HF 4%-5% with silane compared to self-etching (p < 0.05; MD: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13-0.35; I2 = 3%, p = 0.42), while it indicated that there was no significant difference between self-etching compared to 9%-10% HF with silane (p = 0.92; MD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.36; I2 = 14%, p = 0.32).
Conclusion: Self-etching primer presents bond strength that is superior to or similar to conventional surface treatment on glass and hybrid ceramics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.