{"title":"Impact of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Caiping Li, Yongmei Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Perioperative respiratory adverse events continue to pose significant challenges in pediatric anesthesia. Research has hinted at a lower incidence of these complications in children anesthetized with propofol than sevoflurane. This study aimed to assess and compare respiratory complications in children undergoing general anesthesia with either sevoflurane or propofol during surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and manual searches to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 19, 2023. The Cochrane risk assessment tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias in the selected studies. The pooled analysis of relevant data compared respiratory complications, vomiting, agitation, anesthesia duration, extubation time, and recovery time in pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 17 RCTs, containing 1,758 pediatric participants, were included and analyzed. Respiratory adverse events were examined, encompassing laryngospasm, apnea, cough, and SpO2. In comparison to sevoflurane, children subjected to propofol anesthesia demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of laryngospasm (P = .001), vomiting (P < .001), and agitation (P = .029). Especially in patients receiving laryngeal mask airway, propofol anesthesia significantly reduced the incidence of laryngospasm (P = .003) and agitation (P < .001). At the same time, they exhibited an increased risk of apnea (P = .039). Notably, no statistically significant disparities were observed between sevoflurane and propofol concerning cough, SpO2 < 95%, anesthesia time, extubation time, and recovery time. Administration of propofol following sevoflurane anesthesia did not significantly impact the occurrence of vomiting or the recovery time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While propofol presents an elevated risk of apnea, it concurrently yields a significant reduction in laryngospasm, vomiting, and agitation. Consequently, propofol emerges as a favorable anesthetic option for pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.03.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Perioperative respiratory adverse events continue to pose significant challenges in pediatric anesthesia. Research has hinted at a lower incidence of these complications in children anesthetized with propofol than sevoflurane. This study aimed to assess and compare respiratory complications in children undergoing general anesthesia with either sevoflurane or propofol during surgery.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and manual searches to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 19, 2023. The Cochrane risk assessment tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias in the selected studies. The pooled analysis of relevant data compared respiratory complications, vomiting, agitation, anesthesia duration, extubation time, and recovery time in pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol.
Findings: A total of 17 RCTs, containing 1,758 pediatric participants, were included and analyzed. Respiratory adverse events were examined, encompassing laryngospasm, apnea, cough, and SpO2. In comparison to sevoflurane, children subjected to propofol anesthesia demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of laryngospasm (P = .001), vomiting (P < .001), and agitation (P = .029). Especially in patients receiving laryngeal mask airway, propofol anesthesia significantly reduced the incidence of laryngospasm (P = .003) and agitation (P < .001). At the same time, they exhibited an increased risk of apnea (P = .039). Notably, no statistically significant disparities were observed between sevoflurane and propofol concerning cough, SpO2 < 95%, anesthesia time, extubation time, and recovery time. Administration of propofol following sevoflurane anesthesia did not significantly impact the occurrence of vomiting or the recovery time.
Conclusions: While propofol presents an elevated risk of apnea, it concurrently yields a significant reduction in laryngospasm, vomiting, and agitation. Consequently, propofol emerges as a favorable anesthetic option for pediatric patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.