Network meta-analysis: a powerful tool for clinicians, decision-makers, and methodologists

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111537
Ivan D. Florez , Juan E. De La Cruz-Mena , Areti-Angeliki Veroniki
{"title":"Network meta-analysis: a powerful tool for clinicians, decision-makers, and methodologists","authors":"Ivan D. Florez ,&nbsp;Juan E. De La Cruz-Mena ,&nbsp;Areti-Angeliki Veroniki","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Network Meta-analysis (NMA) is an advanced statistical method that combines direct evidence (ie, from head-to-head comparisons) and indirect evidence (ie, estimated from the direct available evidence) to obtain network estimates. NMAs are helpful to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions that have not been directly compared and may provide more precise estimates for those comparisons that have been directly compared. NMA provides hierarchies which can be helpful for decision-making, much more in scenarios when multiple interventions exist for the same indication. In this article we provide a summary of the key concepts that users, namely, clinicians and methodologists need to consider when using an NMA to inform decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 111537"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624002932","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network Meta-analysis (NMA) is an advanced statistical method that combines direct evidence (ie, from head-to-head comparisons) and indirect evidence (ie, estimated from the direct available evidence) to obtain network estimates. NMAs are helpful to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions that have not been directly compared and may provide more precise estimates for those comparisons that have been directly compared. NMA provides hierarchies which can be helpful for decision-making, much more in scenarios when multiple interventions exist for the same indication. In this article we provide a summary of the key concepts that users, namely, clinicians and methodologists need to consider when using an NMA to inform decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络元分析:临床医生、决策者和方法论专家的有力工具。
网络荟萃分析(NMA)是一种先进的统计方法,它将直接证据(即来自正面比较的证据)和间接证据(即从现有直接证据中估算出的证据)结合起来,以获得网络估算值。NMA 有助于确定未进行直接比较的干预措施的比较效果,并可为那些已进行直接比较的干预措施提供更精确的估计值。NMA 提供的层次结构有助于决策,尤其是在针对同一适应症存在多种干预措施的情况下。在本文中,我们总结了用户(即临床医生和方法学家)在使用 NMA 为决策提供信息时需要考虑的关键概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
期刊最新文献
Research culture influences in health and biomedical research: Rapid scoping review and content analysis. Corrigendum to 'Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of cochrane review searches' [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 149 (2022) 83-88]. A methodological review identified several options for utilizing registries for randomized controlled trials. Real-time Adaptive Randomization of Clinical Trials. Some superiority trials with non-significant results published in high impact factor journals correspond to non-inferiority situations: a research-on-research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1