Originalbeiträge (Originals). High Young schema levels predict manualized confrontation therapy outcome in patients with panic disorder / Der Einfluss von Schemata nach Young auf das Therapieergebnis von Patienten mit Panikstörung.

Vanessa Renner, Jana Henker, Peter Joraschky, Andrea Keller, Katja Petrowski
{"title":"Originalbeiträge (Originals). High Young schema levels predict manualized confrontation therapy outcome in patients with panic disorder / Der Einfluss von Schemata nach Young auf das Therapieergebnis von Patienten mit Panikstörung.","authors":"Vanessa Renner, Jana Henker, Peter Joraschky, Andrea Keller, Katja Petrowski","doi":"10.13109/zptm.2024.70.3.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of schemas is well established in personality disorders. Their influence on therapy outcome of patients with Axis I disorders remains unclear. Therefore, patients with a panic disorder (PD) with/without agoraphobia varying in their expression of early maladaptive schemas were examined regarding therapy outcomes after exposure therapy. In this study, a sample of 216 patients with panic disorder with/without agoraphobia were recruited in a day clinic. After the initial diagnosis with the Structured Clinical Interview, the patients filled out the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-S2), Beck Depression Inventory and Revised Symptom Checklist. Afterwards, they participated in a five-week manualized exposure therapy by Lang et al. (2011). Subjects with high schema scores showed lower therapeutic success rates than subjects with a weaker pattern score. In addition, it was found that high schema levels, especially of schemas regarding impaired autonomy and achievement (YSQ-S2: domain 2), influenced therapy outcome by either predicting more/severe or less/milder anxiety-, phobicrelated and general symptoms after therapy. The results of this study emphasize the role of schemas not only for personality disorders but also for disorders on Axis I. For PD with/without agoraphobia, schemas regarding impaired autonomy and achievement seem to play the most important role regarding the influence on therapy outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":51217,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","volume":"70 3","pages":"212-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2024.70.3.212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of schemas is well established in personality disorders. Their influence on therapy outcome of patients with Axis I disorders remains unclear. Therefore, patients with a panic disorder (PD) with/without agoraphobia varying in their expression of early maladaptive schemas were examined regarding therapy outcomes after exposure therapy. In this study, a sample of 216 patients with panic disorder with/without agoraphobia were recruited in a day clinic. After the initial diagnosis with the Structured Clinical Interview, the patients filled out the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-S2), Beck Depression Inventory and Revised Symptom Checklist. Afterwards, they participated in a five-week manualized exposure therapy by Lang et al. (2011). Subjects with high schema scores showed lower therapeutic success rates than subjects with a weaker pattern score. In addition, it was found that high schema levels, especially of schemas regarding impaired autonomy and achievement (YSQ-S2: domain 2), influenced therapy outcome by either predicting more/severe or less/milder anxiety-, phobicrelated and general symptoms after therapy. The results of this study emphasize the role of schemas not only for personality disorders but also for disorders on Axis I. For PD with/without agoraphobia, schemas regarding impaired autonomy and achievement seem to play the most important role regarding the influence on therapy outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原创性稿件(Originals)。杨氏模式的高水平可预测惊恐障碍患者的手动对抗疗法结果/Der Einfluss von Schemata nach Young auf das Therapieergebnis von Patienten mit Panikstörung.
图式在人格障碍中的作用已得到公认。但它们对轴一障碍患者治疗效果的影响仍不明确。因此,我们对伴有/不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍(PD)患者在暴露疗法后的治疗效果进行了研究,这些患者的早期适应不良图式表现各不相同。本研究在一家日间诊所招募了 216 名伴有/不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍患者。通过结构化临床访谈进行初步诊断后,患者填写了青年模式问卷(YSQ-S2)、贝克抑郁量表和修订症状清单。之后,他们参加了由 Lang 等人(2011 年)设计的为期五周的手动暴露疗法。与模式得分较低的受试者相比,模式得分高的受试者治疗成功率较低。此外,研究还发现,高模式水平,尤其是自主性和成就感受损的模式(YSQ-S2:领域 2),会影响治疗结果,预示着治疗后焦虑、恐惧症相关症状和一般症状的加重/减轻。对于伴有/不伴有广场恐惧症的帕金森病患者来说,自主性和成就感受损的图式似乎对治疗结果的影响最为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides a systematic overview of the entire field of psychosomatic medicine. It is also the official organ of the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy (DGPM). It serves as a forum for discussions of the interdisciplinary experiences in the field of psychosomatics, the goal being the furtherance of scientific insights into the interactions between mental and physical factors in the development of disease. It also provides a way to deepen one´s knowledge of psychoanalysis and to explore new therapeutic directions.
期刊最新文献
Fragebogen zur Empirischen Untersuchung von Abwehrmechanismen (FEUA). Schweigen in der videobasierten Psychotherapie Eine Pilotstudie. Die Autorinnen und Autoren dieses Heftes. Editorial. Viele Wege führen zum Ziel – Therapieerfolg im Spiegel individueller Strukturen und systemischer Herausforderungen. Inhalt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1