Mirtazapine to alleviate severe breathlessness in patients with COPD or interstitial lung diseases (BETTER-B): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 mixed-method trial.

IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Lancet Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00187-5
Irene J Higginson, Sarah T Brown, Adejoke O Oluyase, Peter May, Matthew Maddocks, Massimo Costantini, Sabrina Bajwah, Charles Normand, Claudia Bausewein, Steffen T Simon, Karen Ryan, David C Currow, Miriam J Johnson, Simon P Hart, Hannah Mather, Malgorzata Krajnik, Silvia Tanzi, Luca Ghirotto, Charlotte E Bolton, Piotr Janowiak, Elena Turola, Caroline J Jolley, Geraldine Murden, Andrew Wilcock, Bobbie Farsides, Julia M Brown
{"title":"Mirtazapine to alleviate severe breathlessness in patients with COPD or interstitial lung diseases (BETTER-B): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 mixed-method trial.","authors":"Irene J Higginson, Sarah T Brown, Adejoke O Oluyase, Peter May, Matthew Maddocks, Massimo Costantini, Sabrina Bajwah, Charles Normand, Claudia Bausewein, Steffen T Simon, Karen Ryan, David C Currow, Miriam J Johnson, Simon P Hart, Hannah Mather, Malgorzata Krajnik, Silvia Tanzi, Luca Ghirotto, Charlotte E Bolton, Piotr Janowiak, Elena Turola, Caroline J Jolley, Geraldine Murden, Andrew Wilcock, Bobbie Farsides, Julia M Brown","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00187-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breathlessness frequently becomes severe among people with respiratory disease. Mirtazapine, a widely used antidepressant, has shown promise in the modulation of respiratory sensation and the response to it, as well as reducing feelings of panic, which often accompanies breathlessness. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of mirtazapine to alleviate severe persisting breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, multicentre, phase 3, parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial across 16 centres in seven countries (Australia, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, and the UK), recruited adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung diseases, or both, and grade 3 or 4 of the modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale. Consenting participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral mirtazapine or matching placebo for 56 days. Randomisation was by minimisation. The initial mirtazapine dose was 15 mg, escalating to a maximum of 45 mg per day, tapered at treatment end. Participants, caregivers, assessors, and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was worst breathlessness in the preceding 24 h measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), at 56 days post-treatment start, with follow-up to 180 days. The primary analysis was performed in the modified intention-to-treat population using multivariable multi-level repeated measures model. This trial was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN10487976 and ISRCTN15751764 [Australia and New Zealand]) and EudraCT (2019-002001-21) and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Feb 4, 2021 and March 28, 2023, we enrolled 225 eligible participants (148 men and 77 women, 113 to the mirtazapine group and 112 to the placebo group). The median age was 74 years (IQR 67-78). No evidence of a difference was found in worst breathlessness at day 56 between mirtazapine and placebo (difference in adjusted mean NRS score was 0·105 [95% CI -0·407 to 0·618]; p=0·69). Although the study was underpowered, the primary endpoint effect did not reach the pre-specified treatment effect of 0·55 for worst breathlessness score reduction that the study was powered to detect for the primary analysis. There were 215 adverse reactions in 72 (64%) of 113 participants in the mirtazapine group versus 116 in 44 (40%) of 110 participants in the placebo group; 11 serious adverse events in six (5%) participants in the mirtazapine group versus eight in seven (6%) participants in the placebo group; and one (1%) suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction in the mirtazapine group. At day 56, there were three deaths in the mirtazapine group and two deaths in the placebo group. At day 180, there were seven deaths in the mirtazapine group and 11 deaths in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings suggested that mirtazapine of doses 15 to 45 mg daily over 56 days does not improve severe breathlessness among patients with COPD or interstitial lung diseases and might cause adverse reactions. Based on these findings, we do not recommend mirtazapine as a treatment to alleviate severe breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>EU Horizon 2020 (grant agreement No. 825319); Cicely Saunders International Breathlessness Programme; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration South London; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council-EU (application ID: APP1170731).</p>","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":38.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00187-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breathlessness frequently becomes severe among people with respiratory disease. Mirtazapine, a widely used antidepressant, has shown promise in the modulation of respiratory sensation and the response to it, as well as reducing feelings of panic, which often accompanies breathlessness. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of mirtazapine to alleviate severe persisting breathlessness.

Methods: This international, multicentre, phase 3, parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial across 16 centres in seven countries (Australia, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, and the UK), recruited adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung diseases, or both, and grade 3 or 4 of the modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale. Consenting participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral mirtazapine or matching placebo for 56 days. Randomisation was by minimisation. The initial mirtazapine dose was 15 mg, escalating to a maximum of 45 mg per day, tapered at treatment end. Participants, caregivers, assessors, and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was worst breathlessness in the preceding 24 h measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), at 56 days post-treatment start, with follow-up to 180 days. The primary analysis was performed in the modified intention-to-treat population using multivariable multi-level repeated measures model. This trial was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN10487976 and ISRCTN15751764 [Australia and New Zealand]) and EudraCT (2019-002001-21) and is complete.

Findings: Between Feb 4, 2021 and March 28, 2023, we enrolled 225 eligible participants (148 men and 77 women, 113 to the mirtazapine group and 112 to the placebo group). The median age was 74 years (IQR 67-78). No evidence of a difference was found in worst breathlessness at day 56 between mirtazapine and placebo (difference in adjusted mean NRS score was 0·105 [95% CI -0·407 to 0·618]; p=0·69). Although the study was underpowered, the primary endpoint effect did not reach the pre-specified treatment effect of 0·55 for worst breathlessness score reduction that the study was powered to detect for the primary analysis. There were 215 adverse reactions in 72 (64%) of 113 participants in the mirtazapine group versus 116 in 44 (40%) of 110 participants in the placebo group; 11 serious adverse events in six (5%) participants in the mirtazapine group versus eight in seven (6%) participants in the placebo group; and one (1%) suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction in the mirtazapine group. At day 56, there were three deaths in the mirtazapine group and two deaths in the placebo group. At day 180, there were seven deaths in the mirtazapine group and 11 deaths in the placebo group.

Interpretation: Our findings suggested that mirtazapine of doses 15 to 45 mg daily over 56 days does not improve severe breathlessness among patients with COPD or interstitial lung diseases and might cause adverse reactions. Based on these findings, we do not recommend mirtazapine as a treatment to alleviate severe breathlessness.

Funding: EU Horizon 2020 (grant agreement No. 825319); Cicely Saunders International Breathlessness Programme; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration South London; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council-EU (application ID: APP1170731).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米氮平缓解慢性阻塞性肺疾病或间质性肺疾病患者严重呼吸困难(BETTER-B):一项国际多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、第 3 期混合方法试验。
背景:呼吸困难在呼吸系统疾病患者中经常变得非常严重。米氮平是一种广泛使用的抗抑郁药,在调节呼吸感觉和对呼吸感觉的反应以及减轻经常伴随呼吸困难的恐慌感方面表现出良好的前景。我们旨在确定米氮平对缓解严重持续性呼吸困难的有效性:这项国际性、多中心、第 3 期、平行组、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验在 7 个国家(澳大利亚、德国、爱尔兰、意大利、新西兰、波兰和英国)的 16 个中心进行,招募了患有慢性阻塞性肺病 (COPD)、间质性肺病或同时患有这两种疾病,并在医学研究委员会修订的呼吸困难量表中达到 3 级或 4 级的成年人。征得同意的参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受口服米氮平或相应的安慰剂,为期 56 天。随机化程度为最小化。米氮平的初始剂量为15毫克,每天最大剂量为45毫克,治疗结束后逐渐减少。参与者、护理人员、评估人员和研究人员均被蒙蔽,不知道分组情况。主要研究结果为治疗开始后56天内以0-10数字评分量表(NRS)测量的前24小时内最严重的呼吸困难,随访至180天。主要分析采用多变量多层次重复测量模型,在修正的意向治疗人群中进行。该试验已在 ISRCTN(ISRCTN10487976 和 ISRCTN15751764 [澳大利亚和新西兰])和 EudraCT(2019-002001-21)注册,目前已完成:2021年2月4日至2023年3月28日期间,我们招募了225名符合条件的参与者(男性148人,女性77人,米氮平组113人,安慰剂组112人)。中位年龄为 74 岁(IQR 67-78)。没有证据表明米氮平与安慰剂在第56天的最严重窒息程度上存在差异(调整后的平均NRS评分差异为0-105 [95% CI -0-407 to 0-618];P=0-69)。虽然该研究的研究动力不足,但主要终点效应并未达到预先指定的治疗效果,即最严重呼吸困难评分降低0-55分,而该研究的研究动力是检测主要分析。米氮平组113名参与者中有72人(64%)出现215例不良反应,安慰剂组110名参与者中有44人(40%)出现116例不良反应;米氮平组有6人(5%)出现11例严重不良反应,安慰剂组有7人(6%)出现8例严重不良反应;米氮平组有1人(1%)出现疑似意外严重不良反应。第 56 天,米氮平组有 3 人死亡,安慰剂组有 2 人死亡。第180天时,米氮平组有7人死亡,安慰剂组有11人死亡:我们的研究结果表明,在56天内每天服用15至45毫克剂量的米氮平并不能改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病或间质性肺疾病患者的严重呼吸困难,而且可能会引起不良反应。基于这些研究结果,我们不建议将米氮平作为缓解严重呼吸困难的治疗药物:欧盟地平线2020(赠款协议编号:825319);西塞利-桑德斯国际呼吸困难计划;伦敦南部国家健康与护理研究所应用研究合作;澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究委员会-欧盟(申请编号:APP1170731)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Lancet Respiratory Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
87.10
自引率
0.70%
发文量
572
期刊介绍: The Lancet Respiratory Medicine is a renowned journal specializing in respiratory medicine and critical care. Our publication features original research that aims to advocate for change or shed light on clinical practices in the field. Additionally, we provide informative reviews on various topics related to respiratory medicine and critical care, ensuring a comprehensive coverage of the subject. The journal covers a wide range of topics including but not limited to asthma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tobacco control, intensive care medicine, lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, pneumonia, sarcoidosis, sepsis, mesothelioma, sleep medicine, thoracic and reconstructive surgery, tuberculosis, palliative medicine, influenza, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary vascular disease, and respiratory infections. By encompassing such a broad spectrum of subjects, we strive to address the diverse needs and interests of our readership.
期刊最新文献
European Respiratory Society International Congress 2024 James Chalmers: A maverick making an impact in bronchiectasis. Sedation targets in the ICU: thinking beyond protocols. High-dose hyperfractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy versus standard-dose radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in China: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. New strategies for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1