Trustworthiness of voting advice applications in Europe.

IF 3.4 2区哲学 Q1 ETHICS Ethics and Information Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s10676-024-09790-6

Elisabeth Stockinger, Jonne Maas, Christofer Talvitie, Virginia Dignum

{"title":"Trustworthiness of voting advice applications in Europe.","authors":"Elisabeth Stockinger, Jonne Maas, Christofer Talvitie, Virginia Dignum","doi":"10.1007/s10676-024-09790-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) are interactive tools used to assist in one's choice of a party or candidate to vote for in an upcoming election. They have the potential to increase citizens' trust and participation in democratic structures. However, there is no established ground truth for one's electoral choice, and VAA recommendations depend strongly on architectural and design choices. We assessed several representative European VAAs according to the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI provided by the European Commission using publicly available information. We found scores to be comparable across VAAs and low in most requirements, with differences reflecting the kind of developing institution. Across VAAs, we identify the need for improvement in (i) transparency regarding the subjectivity of recommendations, (ii) diversity of stakeholder participation, (iii) user-centric documentation of algorithm, and (iv) disclosure of the underlying values and assumptions.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10676-024-09790-6.","PeriodicalId":51495,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Information Technology","volume":"26 3","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09790-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) are interactive tools used to assist in one's choice of a party or candidate to vote for in an upcoming election. They have the potential to increase citizens' trust and participation in democratic structures. However, there is no established ground truth for one's electoral choice, and VAA recommendations depend strongly on architectural and design choices. We assessed several representative European VAAs according to the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI provided by the European Commission using publicly available information. We found scores to be comparable across VAAs and low in most requirements, with differences reflecting the kind of developing institution. Across VAAs, we identify the need for improvement in (i) transparency regarding the subjectivity of recommendations, (ii) diversity of stakeholder participation, (iii) user-centric documentation of algorithm, and (iv) disclosure of the underlying values and assumptions.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10676-024-09790-6.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

欧洲投票建议应用程序的可信度。

投票咨询应用程序（VAAs）是一种互动工具，用于帮助人们在即将举行的选举中选择党派或候选人。它们有可能增加公民对民主结构的信任和参与。然而，一个人的选举选择并没有既定的基本事实，VAA 的建议在很大程度上取决于架构和设计选择。我们根据欧盟委员会提供的《可信人工智能道德准则》，利用公开信息评估了几个具有代表性的欧洲 VAA。我们发现各 VAA 的得分不相上下，大多数要求的得分较低，差异反映了发展中机构的类型。在所有 VAA 中，我们发现在以下方面需要改进：(i) 建议主观性的透明度；(ii) 利益相关者参与的多样性；(iii) 以用户为中心的算法文档；(iv) 基本价值观和假设的披露：在线版本包含补充材料，可查阅 10.1007/s10676-024-09790-6。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Ethics and Information Technology Multiple-

CiteScore

8.20

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Ethics and Information Technology is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the dialogue between moral philosophy and the field of information and communication technology (ICT). The journal aims to foster and promote reflection and analysis which is intended to make a constructive contribution to answering the ethical, social and political questions associated with the adoption, use, and development of ICT. Within the scope of the journal are also conceptual analysis and discussion of ethical ICT issues which arise in the context of technology assessment, cultural studies, public policy analysis and public administration, cognitive science, social and anthropological studies in technology, mass-communication, and legal studies.

期刊最新文献

Engineers on responsibility: feminist approaches to who’s responsible for ethical AI AI and the need for justification (to the patient). Trustworthiness of voting advice applications in Europe. Large language models and their big bullshit potential. How to teach responsible AI in Higher Education: challenges and opportunities