Evaluating the Perceived Value of Holistic Certification Among Nurses: A Descriptive Survey Study.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING Journal of Holistic Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1177/08980101241277050
Cidalia J Vital, Cynthia Peterson, Ellen Benjamin, Deborah A Naglieri-Prescod, Patricia Faron, Brian H Nathanson
{"title":"Evaluating the Perceived Value of Holistic Certification Among Nurses: A Descriptive Survey Study.","authors":"Cidalia J Vital, Cynthia Peterson, Ellen Benjamin, Deborah A Naglieri-Prescod, Patricia Faron, Brian H Nathanson","doi":"10.1177/08980101241277050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Specialty nursing certifications serve as a validation of nursing knowledge in specific areas. Holistic nursing emphasizes comprehensive patient care and incorporates complementary alternative modalities (CAM) into daily care. Despite its significance, limited research has evaluated the perceived value of holistic nursing certification among nurses. <b>Study Design:</b> Descriptive survey design. <b>Methods:</b> The Likert-scale survey Perceived Value of Certification (PVCT)-12 Tool was given to holistic certified and non-certified nurses at a large, academic Magnet hospital in the northeast United States from 10/2022 to 2/2023. Additionally, non-certified nurses were asked to select the top three barriers to certification from a list of nine. The responses between certified and non-certified nurses were compared using the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Student's t-test as appropriate. <b>Findings:</b> A total of 59 nurses (25 certified, 34 non-certified) met inclusion criteria. Ninety-six percent of certified nurses versus 64.7% of non-certified nurses agreed that certification demonstrates a commitment to the nursing profession, <i>p</i> = 0.004, but, otherwise, responses to the PVCT-12 Tool were similar. Both groups felt certification was more strongly associated with intrinsic factors (e.g., sense of accomplishment) than extrinsic factors (e.g., salary). <b>Conclusion:</b> Nurses were consistent in their perceived value of holistic certification, regardless of their certification status.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101241277050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Specialty nursing certifications serve as a validation of nursing knowledge in specific areas. Holistic nursing emphasizes comprehensive patient care and incorporates complementary alternative modalities (CAM) into daily care. Despite its significance, limited research has evaluated the perceived value of holistic nursing certification among nurses. Study Design: Descriptive survey design. Methods: The Likert-scale survey Perceived Value of Certification (PVCT)-12 Tool was given to holistic certified and non-certified nurses at a large, academic Magnet hospital in the northeast United States from 10/2022 to 2/2023. Additionally, non-certified nurses were asked to select the top three barriers to certification from a list of nine. The responses between certified and non-certified nurses were compared using the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Student's t-test as appropriate. Findings: A total of 59 nurses (25 certified, 34 non-certified) met inclusion criteria. Ninety-six percent of certified nurses versus 64.7% of non-certified nurses agreed that certification demonstrates a commitment to the nursing profession, p = 0.004, but, otherwise, responses to the PVCT-12 Tool were similar. Both groups felt certification was more strongly associated with intrinsic factors (e.g., sense of accomplishment) than extrinsic factors (e.g., salary). Conclusion: Nurses were consistent in their perceived value of holistic certification, regardless of their certification status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估护士对整体认证的认知价值:描述性调查研究。
目的:专科护理认证是对特定领域护理知识的验证。整体护理强调对患者进行全面护理,并将补充替代方式 (CAM) 纳入日常护理中。尽管整体护理认证意义重大,但对护士整体护理认证价值的评估研究却十分有限。研究设计:描述性调查设计。调查方法:从 2022 年 10 月 10 日至 2023 年 2 月 2 日,对美国东北部一家大型学术磁性医院的整体护理认证护士和非认证护士进行了李克特量表调查 "认证感知价值(PVCT)-12 工具"。此外,还要求非认证护士从九个障碍中选择前三个障碍。根据情况,使用卡方检验、费雪精确检验或学生 t 检验对认证护士和非认证护士的回答进行比较。调查结果:共有 59 名护士(25 名获得认证,34 名未获得认证)符合纳入标准。96%的认证护士和 64.7%的非认证护士都认为,认证表明了对护理职业的承诺,P = 0.004,但除此之外,对 PVCT-12 工具的反应相似。两组人都认为认证与内在因素(如成就感)的关系比与外在因素(如工资)的关系更密切。结论:无论护士的认证状态如何,他们对整体认证价值的认识是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Forgiveness and Religiosity Among Nurses: A Correlational Descriptive Study". The Effect of Forgiveness and Resilience on Anxiety, Depression and Stress in Nursing Students. Effects of the Vitality Acupunch Exercise Program on Older Adults With Probable Sarcopenia: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study. Integration of Mindfulness Educational Innovation in Nursing Programs. The Lifestyle and Quality of Life Among Nursing Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1