{"title":"Validation of regression-based change formulae for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Kevin Duff, Deborah Sevigny-Resetco","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identification of cognitive decline is critical in older adults at risk for dementia. In a 2020 study reported in <i>Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</i>, Kiselica and colleagues developed standardized regression-based (SRB) change formulae for the Uniform Data Set 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery in cognitively unimpaired older adults. However, validation of their applicability in impaired individuals is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using longitudinal data on 5974 participants (cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, dementia) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, SRB change scores were calculated for each individual and compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 6 to 24 months, minimal cognitive change was observed in cognitively unimpaired participants. Modest declines were seen in those with mild cognitive impairment and substantial declines in those with dementia. Change scores were negatively correlated with the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. In impaired individuals, SRB scores indicated more decline in those with positive amyloid scans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Validation of SRB scores affords greater confidence in employing them in clinical and research settings.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Validation of regression-based cognitive change scores in impaired samples.Clear differences on change scores across three groups (intact, MCI, dementia).Largely stable scores in intact participants, but notable decline in MCI and dementia.Moderate to strong relationship between change scores and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"16 3","pages":"e70008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Identification of cognitive decline is critical in older adults at risk for dementia. In a 2020 study reported in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Kiselica and colleagues developed standardized regression-based (SRB) change formulae for the Uniform Data Set 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery in cognitively unimpaired older adults. However, validation of their applicability in impaired individuals is needed.
Methods: Using longitudinal data on 5974 participants (cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, dementia) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, SRB change scores were calculated for each individual and compared across groups.
Results: Across 6 to 24 months, minimal cognitive change was observed in cognitively unimpaired participants. Modest declines were seen in those with mild cognitive impairment and substantial declines in those with dementia. Change scores were negatively correlated with the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. In impaired individuals, SRB scores indicated more decline in those with positive amyloid scans.
Discussion: Validation of SRB scores affords greater confidence in employing them in clinical and research settings.
Highlights: Validation of regression-based cognitive change scores in impaired samples.Clear differences on change scores across three groups (intact, MCI, dementia).Largely stable scores in intact participants, but notable decline in MCI and dementia.Moderate to strong relationship between change scores and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.